| name | viral-title |
| description | Generate high-potential viral title candidates for content across WeChat public account articles, X/Twitter posts, YouTube videos, Bilibili videos, and similar content platforms. Use when the user needs headline/title ideation, batch title generation, platform-specific title adaptation, title-library reuse, title selection, title scoring, or a reusable title workflow based on universal formulas plus separated platform methods such as 公众号, X, YouTube, and B站. |
Viral Title
Overview
Use this skill to generate and select viral title candidates. The current version implements Phase 1 universal methodology, WeChat public-account title reuse, X/Twitter hook generation, YouTube title-thumbnail packaging, Bilibili title-cover-tag packaging, and a lightweight evolution loop.
Phase 1 must generate 30 titles: 10 universal formulas x 3 variants per formula. Then score the candidates and recommend the single best title.
Workflow
- Clarify only if the content is too vague to title.
- Identify the core material:
- topic or content summary
- target audience
- platform if provided
- strongest value, conflict, novelty, or emotional hook
- hard facts, numbers, names, examples, and constraints that must remain true
- Read
references/phase1-universal-methodology.md.
- If the user names a platform, load the matching platform reference from
references/platforms/.
- Read
references/evolution/promoted-rules.md and references/evolution/anti-patterns.md.
- Generate exactly 3 titles for each of the 10 Phase 1 formulas.
- If a platform reference is implemented, generate platform-tuned candidates after the universal batch when the user asks for platform-specific titles.
- If the user asks to reuse proven titles or says "套用标题库", retrieve relevant examples instead of loading full libraries.
- Score the candidate pool with the Phase 1 scoring rubric plus any platform-specific rules.
- Select one best title and briefly explain why.
- End every substantial title-generation response with the feedback prompt from
Feedback Hook.
- If the user replies with a selected title, edit, rating, or critique, log it with
scripts/log_feedback.py.
Platform Routing
Use one platform file at a time:
| User says | Platform file | Status |
|---|
| 公众号, 微信公众号, WeChat article | references/platforms/wechat-public-account.md | Implemented |
| X, Twitter, 推特 | references/platforms/x.md | Implemented |
| YouTube, 油管 | references/platforms/youtube.md | Implemented |
| B站, Bilibili | references/platforms/bilibili.md | Implemented |
For title-library reuse, load only the current platform's library:
references/title-library/wechat-public-account-hot-titles.md for summary and examples.
references/title-library/wechat-ai-curated-hot-titles.md for user-curated AI/tech viral title patterns and hotspot-dependent examples.
references/title-library/wechat-public-account-hot-titles.json only when many source titles are needed for matching or adaptation.
references/title-library/x-hot-hooks.md for X/Twitter hook skeletons and reusable mechanisms.
references/title-library/youtube-hot-titles.md for YouTube title-thumbnail packaging skeletons.
references/title-library/bilibili-hot-titles.md for B站 title-cover-tag packaging skeletons.
For token-efficient retrieval, prefer:
python3 scripts/retrieve_title_examples.py --platform <wechat|x|youtube|bilibili> --query "<topic words>" --mechanism "<optional mechanism>" --limit 10
Evolution Loop
Use the loop only when logging, feedback, review, or evaluation is useful. Do not load historical logs during ordinary title generation.
| Need | Command |
|---|
| Log a title session | python3 scripts/log_title_session.py --platform <platform> --topic "..." --recommended-title "..." |
| Log user feedback | python3 scripts/log_feedback.py --session-id "..." --platform <platform> --selected-title "..." --user-edit "..." --rating 5 --feedback "..." |
| Retrieve title examples | `python3 scripts/retrieve_title_examples.py --platform <wechat |
| Review recent learning | python3 scripts/analyze_feedback.py --recent 20 |
| Run seed evals | python3 scripts/run_title_evals.py --evals references/evals/bilibili-ai-title-evals.json --case-id agent-speed-step37-bilibili --titles-json titles.json |
Follow meta/RULES.md: append logs automatically, but require user confirmation before modifying core methodology or promoting rules.
Feedback Hook
After every substantial title-generation response, append exactly one short feedback prompt:
**反馈一下**
你最终会用哪个标题?如果你改了标题,把最终版发我;也可以给 1-5 分。我会用这次反馈优化下次标题。
Do not ask for feedback after pure research, implementation, explanation, or tiny one-off edits.
When feedback arrives:
- Treat a chosen title, edited title, rating, or critique as evolution feedback.
- Log feedback with the current platform when known.
- Prefer
user_edit over selected_title when both are provided.
- Store titles, platform, rating, tags, and concise feedback only. Do not store full unpublished drafts by default.
- After every 5-20 feedback records, run
scripts/analyze_feedback.py --recent 20 and summarize learning candidates.
- Do not promote candidate observations into methodology files without user confirmation.
Phase 1 Output Format
Use this structure:
**内容判断**
核心对象:
目标人群:
主要点击理由:
真实约束:
**第一阶段:通用方法论标题池**
1. 结果承诺型
- ...
- ...
- ...
2. 问题解决型
- ...
- ...
- ...
[continue through all 10 formulas]
**最佳标题**
标题:
理由:
**备选 Top 3**
1. ...
2. ...
3. ...
**反馈一下**
你最终会用哪个标题?如果你改了标题,把最终版发我;也可以给 1-5 分。我会用这次反馈优化下次标题。
Quality Rules
- Generate exactly 30 Phase 1 candidates unless the user explicitly asks for fewer.
- Each formula must contribute exactly 3 titles.
- Do not fabricate unsupported facts, names, numbers, or results.
- Prefer concrete nouns, visible stakes, and reader-facing benefits over abstract claims.
- Keep titles platform-neutral in Phase 1. Do not overfit to WeChat, X, YouTube, or Bilibili unless the user asks.
- Use Chinese titles by default when the user writes in Chinese. Use English when the source content or user request is English.
- Avoid empty hype such as "震惊", "必看", "全网最强", unless the user's style explicitly asks for it.
- Make the final recommendation decisive. Do not say "it depends" after scoring.
Future Extension Points
- Add deeper live-sampled libraries for each platform as more user-approved data sources become available.
- Split Bilibili libraries by partition if a single library becomes too broad.
- Load only the platform or library reference needed for the current user request.