Skip to main content

cxc-dev-debugging

Use for debugging and system comprehension. Triggers: debug this, root cause, how does X work, reverse engineer, 왜 안 돼, 디버깅, 원인 분석, 로직 파악, 뜯어봐.

Informations de source

Dépôt
lidge-jun/codexclaw
Dernière activité de la source
9 octobre 2026 à 04:32
Langue détectée de SKILL.md
anglais
Étoiles
48
Forks
10

Options d'installation

Le prompt qui vérifie d'abord la source est sélectionné par défaut. Vous pouvez passer à une commande directe ou télécharger une copie locale.

Vérifiez les fichiers source

Lisez SKILL.md et les fichiers associés affichés par SkillsMP avant de décider de l'installer.

Explorateur de fichiers
26 fichiers

Affichage de SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instructions source · Aperçu en lecture seule
name
cxc-dev-debugging
description
Use for debugging and system comprehension. Triggers: debug this, root cause, how does X work, reverse engineer, 왜 안 돼, 디버깅, 원인 분석, 로직 파악, 뜯어봐.
metadata
{"last-verified":"2026-07-02","short-description":"Phases 0-4 systematic root-cause debugging method (any language).","keywords":["debug","error","stack trace","root cause","flaky","regression","crash","bisect","logic analysis","comprehension","unknown system","reverse engineering"]}
# dev-debugging — Systematic Root Cause Analysis **Boundary**: This skill covers how to reason about bugs. For test harness, reproduction frameworks, and verification tooling, see `dev-testing`. For domain-specific context (API errors, hydration issues, query performance), consult `dev-backend` or `dev-frontend`. Comprehension without a defect — understanding how an unknown app, API, AI tool, or codebase works — routes to `references/logic-analysis.md`. Class, fast path, rule authority, proof, and safety: [dev](../dev/SKILL.md). Current/public evidence: [dev routing](../dev/SKILL.md#conditional-routes). ## Core Principle Check if the problem is structural before debugging code. Before a permanent fix, investigate and explain the cause. During an active incident, an already-authorized, reversible mitigation may precede full RCA; follow `dev-devops` incident policy and preserve evidence. Diagnosis alone never authorizes a code fix, rollback, production access, or an upstream issue submission. ## RCA Entry Gates **STRICT (DEBUG-RCA-EVIDENCE-01):** Before investigating any single root-cause hypothesis or making a root-cause claim, write at least three orthogonal hypotheses (`H1/H2/H3`) and one falsifier for each. Collapse duplicates, test against disconfirming evidence, and do not claim root cause until competing hypotheses have been ruled out by evidence. If fewer than three are plausible, state why. **STRICT (DEBUG-TOGGLE-PROOF-01):** Enter implementation only after the captured value matches the hypothesis prediction, the repro repeats, and toggling the suspected cause off/on removes then restores the bug. Write one paragraph explaining the causal mechanism before patching. ## Logic Analysis (comprehension without a defect) When the request is to understand how a system works — closed app, AI tool, undocumented API, unfamiliar codebase — rather than to fix a defect, read [Logic analysis](references/logic-analysis.md). Core rules: "I can't" is a skipped analysis loop, not a limit; missing source/docs is a starting condition; hypothesize from names/strings/errors, observe static AND dynamic, mutate one variable at a time, keep an incremental model with UNKNOWN fields, and prove the model by writing a client that uses it. Honest lab-boundary routing (IDA/Procmon/Cuckoo class) beats both refusal and fabrication. ## Security-Sensitive Bugs For security-sensitive bugs (auth bypass, data leak, injection), use `dev-security` for controls and `dev-devops` for incident response. Preserve the same authorization boundary. ## Modular References | Condition | Reference | |---|---| | Defect diagnosis before permanent repair: phases 0–4 and implementation entry gates | [root-cause-phases.md](references/root-cause-phases.md) | | Guessing, repeated failures, or suppressive fixes | [debugging-pitfalls.md](references/debugging-pitfalls.md) | | API 500, hydration mismatch, N+1 query, or flaky-test diagnosis examples | [debugging-scenarios.md](references/debugging-scenarios.md) | | Investigation stalls, needs escalation, or meets postmortem criteria | [escalation-and-postmortems.md](references/escalation-and-postmortems.md) | | Choosing the boundary between debugging and companion skills | [skill-boundaries.md](references/skill-boundaries.md) | | Choosing a debug approach | [methodologies.md](references/methodologies.md) | | Understanding how an unknown system works (no defect) | [logic-analysis.md](references/logic-analysis.md) | | Concurrency issues | [async-debugging.md](references/async-debugging.md) | | Quick cheatsheet | [tool-guides.md](references/tool-guides.md) | | After resolving a significant incident | [postmortem-template.md](references/postmortem-template.md) | | Node.js / tsx / Bun / Deno | [runtimes/node.md](references/runtimes/node.md) | | Next.js 16 / React 19 | [runtimes/js/nextjs-react.md](references/runtimes/js/nextjs-react.md) | | Vite 8 / Vitest 4 | [runtimes/js/vite-vitest.md](references/runtimes/js/vite-vitest.md) | | Express 5 / Fastify 5 / NestJS 11 | [runtimes/js/node-backend.md](references/runtimes/js/node-backend.md) | | Python (CPython 3.9+) | [runtimes/python.md](references/runtimes/python.md) | | Rust | [runtimes/rust.md](references/runtimes/rust.md) | | Go | [runtimes/go.md](references/runtimes/go.md) | | C/C++ | [runtimes/c-cpp.md](references/runtimes/c-cpp.md) | | Java/Kotlin (JVM) | [runtimes/jvm.md](references/runtimes/jvm.md) | | Swift / iOS / macOS AppKit | [runtimes/swift.md](references/runtimes/swift.md) | | Ruby (3.2+) | [runtimes/ruby.md](references/runtimes/ruby.md) | | Elixir/Erlang (BEAM) | [runtimes/beam.md](references/runtimes/beam.md) | | Browser/web-surface bugs | [tools/playwright.md](references/tools/playwright.md) |
Voir sur GitHub