Skip to main content

debug-failing-test

Debug a failing test using an iterative logging approach, then clean up and document the learning.

Aller à l'installation

Informations de source

Dépôt
mahmoud20138/Tradecraft
Dernière activité de la source
23 avril 2026 à 08:40
Langue détectée de SKILL.md
anglais
Étoiles
15
Forks
4

Options d'installation

Le prompt qui vérifie d'abord la source est sélectionné par défaut. Vous pouvez passer à une commande directe ou télécharger une copie locale.

Vérifiez les fichiers source

Lisez SKILL.md et les fichiers associés affichés par SkillsMP avant de décider de l'installer.

Affichage de SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instructions source · Aperçu en lecture seule
name
debug-failing-test
description
Debug a failing test using an iterative logging approach, then clean up and document the learning.
kind
workflow
category
dev/testing
status
active
tags
["debug","dev","failing","test","testing"]
related_skills
["run-e2e-tests","run-integration-tests","run-pre-commit-checks","run-smoke-tests"]
Debug a failing unit test by iteratively adding verbose logging, running the test, and analyzing the output until the root cause is found and fixed. ## Workflow ### Phase 1: Initial Assessment 1. **Run the failing test** to capture the current error message and stack trace 2. **Read the test file** to understand what is being tested 3. **Read the source file** being tested to understand the expected behavior 4. **Identify the assertion that fails** and what values are involved ### Phase 2: Iterative Debugging Loop Repeat until the root cause is understood: 1. **Add verbose logging** around the suspicious code: - Use `console.log('[DEBUG]', ...)` with descriptive labels - Log input values, intermediate states, and return values - Log before/after key operations - Add timestamps if timing might be relevant 2. **Run the test** and capture output 3. **Assess the logging output:** - What values are unexpected? - Where does the behavior diverge from expectations? - What additional logging would help narrow down the issue? 4. **Decide next action:** - If root cause is clear → proceed to fix - If more information needed → add more targeted logging and repeat ### Phase 3: Fix and Verify 1. **Implement the fix** based on findings 2. **Run the test** to verify it passes 3. **Run related tests** to ensure no regressions ### Phase 4: Clean Up 1. **Remove ALL debugging artifacts:** - Delete all `console.log('[DEBUG]', ...)` statements added - Remove any temporary variables or code added for debugging - Ensure the code is in a clean, production-ready state 2. **Verify the test still passes** after cleanup ### Phase 5: Document and Learn 1. **Provide a summary** to the user (1-3 sentences): - What was the bug? - What was the fix? 2. **Record the learning** by following the learning instructions (if you have them): - Extract a single, clear learning from this debugging session - Add it to the "Learnings" section of the most relevant instruction file - If a similar learning already exists, increment its counter instead ## Logging Conventions When adding debug logging, use this format for easy identification and removal: ```typescript console.log('[DEBUG] <location>:', <value>); console.log('[DEBUG] before <operation>:', { input, state }); console.log('[DEBUG] after <operation>:', { result, state }); ``` ## Example Debug Session ```typescript // Added logging example: console.log('[DEBUG] getEnvironments input:', { workspaceFolder }); const envs = await manager.getEnvironments(workspaceFolder); console.log('[DEBUG] getEnvironments result:', { count: envs.length, envs }); ``` ## Notes - Prefer targeted logging over flooding the output - Start with the failing assertion and work backwards - Consider async timing issues, race conditions, and mock setup problems - Check that mocks are returning expected values - Verify test setup/teardown is correct
Voir sur GitHub