Skip to main content

debug-failing-test

Debug a failing test using an iterative logging approach, then clean up and document the learning.

Quellinformationen

Repository
mahmoud20138/Tradecraft
Letzte Quellaktivität
23. April 2026 um 08:40
Erkannte Sprache von SKILL.md
Englisch
Sterne
15
Forks
4

Installationsoptionen

Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.

Quelldateien prüfen

Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.

SKILL.md wird angezeigt

SKILL.md
Quellanweisungen · Schreibgeschützte Vorschau
name
debug-failing-test
description
Debug a failing test using an iterative logging approach, then clean up and document the learning.
kind
workflow
category
dev/testing
status
active
tags
["debug","dev","failing","test","testing"]
related_skills
["run-e2e-tests","run-integration-tests","run-pre-commit-checks","run-smoke-tests"]
Debug a failing unit test by iteratively adding verbose logging, running the test, and analyzing the output until the root cause is found and fixed. ## Workflow ### Phase 1: Initial Assessment 1. **Run the failing test** to capture the current error message and stack trace 2. **Read the test file** to understand what is being tested 3. **Read the source file** being tested to understand the expected behavior 4. **Identify the assertion that fails** and what values are involved ### Phase 2: Iterative Debugging Loop Repeat until the root cause is understood: 1. **Add verbose logging** around the suspicious code: - Use `console.log('[DEBUG]', ...)` with descriptive labels - Log input values, intermediate states, and return values - Log before/after key operations - Add timestamps if timing might be relevant 2. **Run the test** and capture output 3. **Assess the logging output:** - What values are unexpected? - Where does the behavior diverge from expectations? - What additional logging would help narrow down the issue? 4. **Decide next action:** - If root cause is clear → proceed to fix - If more information needed → add more targeted logging and repeat ### Phase 3: Fix and Verify 1. **Implement the fix** based on findings 2. **Run the test** to verify it passes 3. **Run related tests** to ensure no regressions ### Phase 4: Clean Up 1. **Remove ALL debugging artifacts:** - Delete all `console.log('[DEBUG]', ...)` statements added - Remove any temporary variables or code added for debugging - Ensure the code is in a clean, production-ready state 2. **Verify the test still passes** after cleanup ### Phase 5: Document and Learn 1. **Provide a summary** to the user (1-3 sentences): - What was the bug? - What was the fix? 2. **Record the learning** by following the learning instructions (if you have them): - Extract a single, clear learning from this debugging session - Add it to the "Learnings" section of the most relevant instruction file - If a similar learning already exists, increment its counter instead ## Logging Conventions When adding debug logging, use this format for easy identification and removal: ```typescript console.log('[DEBUG] <location>:', <value>); console.log('[DEBUG] before <operation>:', { input, state }); console.log('[DEBUG] after <operation>:', { result, state }); ``` ## Example Debug Session ```typescript // Added logging example: console.log('[DEBUG] getEnvironments input:', { workspaceFolder }); const envs = await manager.getEnvironments(workspaceFolder); console.log('[DEBUG] getEnvironments result:', { count: envs.length, envs }); ``` ## Notes - Prefer targeted logging over flooding the output - Start with the failing assertion and work backwards - Consider async timing issues, race conditions, and mock setup problems - Check that mocks are returning expected values - Verify test setup/teardown is correct
Auf GitHub ansehen