| name | rebuttal-review |
| description | Review and improve a formal academic rebuttal letter draft for peer review responses. |
Rebuttal Review
Use this skill to check an existing rebuttal draft against the original reviews, merged questions, paper evidence, and author strategy.
Workflow
- Read the draft rebuttal, raw reviews, merged questions, and strategy notes.
- Check coverage: every reviewer concern must be answered, intentionally deferred, or marked as needing user input.
- Check grounding: every number, citation, experiment, theorem claim, or promised change must come from supplied evidence.
- Check tone: responses should be respectful, precise, and not argumentative.
- Revise only the rebuttal text needed to fix coverage, grounding, clarity, or tone problems.
- Preserve unresolved evidence gaps as
[TBD] rather than inventing results.
Output Rules
- Return the improved rebuttal text plus a short change log when the user asks for review feedback.
- Do not add experiments, numbers, citations, or commitments that are not supported by the supplied materials.
- Keep reviewer-specific answers traceable to the corresponding reviewer concern.
