rebuttal-review

name	rebuttal-review
description	Review and improve a formal academic rebuttal letter draft for peer review responses.

Rebuttal Review

Use this skill to check an existing rebuttal draft against the original reviews, merged questions, paper evidence, and author strategy.

Workflow

1. Read the draft rebuttal, raw reviews, merged questions, and strategy notes.
2. Check coverage: every reviewer concern must be answered, intentionally deferred, or marked as needing user input.
3. Check grounding: every number, citation, experiment, theorem claim, or promised change must come from supplied evidence.
4. Check tone: responses should be respectful, precise, and not argumentative.
5. Revise only the rebuttal text needed to fix coverage, grounding, clarity, or tone problems.
6. Preserve unresolved evidence gaps as [TBD] rather than inventing results.

Output Rules

• Return the improved rebuttal text plus a short change log when the user asks for review feedback.
• Do not add experiments, numbers, citations, or commitments that are not supported by the supplied materials.
• Keep reviewer-specific answers traceable to the corresponding reviewer concern.