Skip to main content

api-testing-patterns

Comprehensive API testing patterns including contract testing, REST/GraphQL testing, and integration testing. Use when testing APIs or designing API test strategies.

Informations de source

Dépôt
proffesor-for-testing/sentinel-api-testing
Dernière activité de la source
8 décembre 2025 à 14:35
Langue détectée de SKILL.md
anglais
Étoiles
46
Forks
13

Options d'installation

Le prompt qui vérifie d'abord la source est sélectionné par défaut. Vous pouvez passer à une commande directe ou télécharger une copie locale.

Vérifiez les fichiers source

Lisez SKILL.md et les fichiers associés affichés par SkillsMP avant de décider de l'installer.

Affichage de SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instructions source · Aperçu en lecture seule
name
api-testing-patterns
description
Comprehensive API testing patterns including contract testing, REST/GraphQL testing, and integration testing. Use when testing APIs or designing API test strategies.
category
testing-methodologies
priority
high
tokenEstimate
1200
agents
["qe-api-contract-validator","qe-test-generator","qe-performance-tester","qe-security-scanner"]
implementation_status
optimized
optimization_version
1
last_optimized
2025-12-02T00:00:00.000Z
dependencies
[]
quick_reference_card
true
tags
["api","rest","graphql","contract-testing","pact","integration","microservices"]
# API Testing Patterns <default_to_action> When testing APIs or designing API test strategy: 1. IDENTIFY testing level: contract, integration, or component 2. TEST the contract, not implementation (consumer perspective) 3. VALIDATE auth, input, errors, idempotency, concurrency 4. AUTOMATE in CI/CD with schema validation 5. MONITOR production APIs for contract drift **Quick Pattern Selection:** - Microservices → Consumer-driven contracts (Pact) - REST APIs → CRUD + pagination + filtering tests - GraphQL → Query validation + complexity limits - External deps → Mock with component testing - Performance → Load test critical endpoints **Critical Success Factors:** - APIs are contracts - test from consumer perspective - Always test error scenarios, not just happy paths - Version your API tests to prevent breaking changes </default_to_action> ## Quick Reference Card ### When to Use - Testing REST or GraphQL APIs - Validating microservice contracts - Designing API test strategies - Preventing breaking API changes ### Testing Levels | Level | Purpose | Dependencies | Speed | |-------|---------|--------------|-------| | Contract | Provider-consumer agreement | None | Fast | | Component | API in isolation | Mocked | Fast | | Integration | Real dependencies | Database, services | Slower | ### Critical Test Scenarios | Scenario | Must Test | Example | |----------|----------|---------| | Auth | 401/403 handling | Expired token, wrong user | | Input | 400 validation | Missing fields, wrong types | | Errors | 500 graceful handling | DB down, timeout | | Idempotency | Duplicate prevention | Same idempotency key | | Concurrency | Race conditions | Parallel checkout | ### Tools - **Contract**: Pact, Spring Cloud Contract - **REST**: Supertest, REST-assured, Playwright - **Load**: k6, Artillery, JMeter ### Agent Coordination - `qe-api-contract-validator`: Validate contracts, detect breaking changes - `qe-test-generator`: Generate tests from OpenAPI spec - `qe-performance-tester`: Load test endpoints - `qe-security-scanner`: API security testing --- ## Contract Testing **Pattern: Consumer-Driven Contracts** ```javascript // Consumer defines expectations const contract = { request: { method: 'POST', path: '/orders', body: { productId: 'abc', quantity: 2 } }, response: { status: 201, body: { orderId: 'string', total: 'number' } } }; // Provider must fulfill test('order API meets contract', async () => { const response = await api.post('/orders', { productId: 'abc', quantity: 2 }); expect(response.status).toBe(201); expect(response.body).toMatchSchema({ orderId: expect.any(String), total: expect.any(Number) }); }); ``` **When:** Microservices, distributed systems, third-party integrations --- ## Critical Test Patterns ### Authentication & Authorization ```javascript describe('Auth', () => { it('rejects without token', async () => { expect((await api.get('/orders')).status).toBe(401); }); it('rejects expired token', async () => { const expired = generateExpiredToken(); expect((await api.get('/orders', { headers: { Authorization: `Bearer ${expired}` } })).status).toBe(401); }); it('blocks cross-user access', async () => { const userAToken = generateToken({ userId: 'A' }); expect((await api.get('/orders/user-B-order', { headers: { Authorization: `Bearer ${userAToken}` } })).status).toBe(403); }); }); ``` ### Input Validation ```javascript describe('Validation', () => { it('validates required fields', async () => { const response = await api.post('/orders', { quantity: 2 }); // Missing productId expect(response.status).toBe(400); expect(response.body.errors).toContain('productId is required'); }); it('validates types', async () => { expect((await api.post('/orders', { productId: 'abc', quantity: 'two' })).status).toBe(400); }); it('validates ranges', async () => { expect((await api.post('/orders', { productId: 'abc', quantity: -5 })).status).toBe(400); }); }); ``` ### Idempotency ```javascript it('prevents duplicates with idempotency key', async () => { const key = 'unique-123'; const data = { productId: 'abc', quantity: 2 }; const r1 = await api.post('/orders', data, { headers: { 'Idempotency-Key': key } }); const r2 = await api.post('/orders', data, { headers: { 'Idempotency-Key': key } }); expect(r1.body.orderId).toBe(r2.body.orderId); // Same order }); ``` ### Concurrency ```javascript it('handles race condition on inventory', async () => { const promises = Array(10).fill().map(() => api.post('/orders', { productId: 'abc', quantity: 1 }) ); const responses = await Promise.all(promises); const successful = responses.filter(r => r.status === 201); const inventory = await db.inventory.findById('abc'); expect(inventory.quantity).toBe(initialQuantity - successful.length); }); ``` --- ## REST CRUD Pattern ```javascript describe('Product CRUD', () => { let productId; it('CREATE', async () => { const r = await api.post('/products', { name: 'Widget', price: 10 }); expect(r.status).toBe(201); productId = r.body.id; }); it('READ', async () => { const r = await api.get(`/products/${productId}`); expect(r.body.name).toBe('Widget'); }); it('UPDATE', async () => { const r = await api.put(`/products/${productId}`, { price: 12 }); expect(r.body.price).toBe(12); }); it('DELETE', async () => { expect((await api.delete(`/products/${productId}`)).status).toBe(204); expect((await api.get(`/products/${productId}`)).status).toBe(404); }); }); ``` --- ## Best Practices ### ✅ Do This - Test from consumer perspective - Use schema validation (not exact values) - Test error scenarios extensively - Version API tests - Automate in CI/CD ### ❌ Avoid This - Testing implementation, not contract - Ignoring HTTP semantics (status codes) - No negative testing - Asserting on field order or extra fields - Slow tests (mock external services) --- ## Agent-Assisted API Testing ```typescript // Validate contracts await Task("Contract Validation", { spec: 'openapi.yaml', endpoint: '/orders', checkBreakingChanges: true }, "qe-api-contract-validator"); // Generate tests from spec await Task("Generate API Tests", { spec: 'openapi.yaml', coverage: 'comprehensive', include: ['happy-paths', 'input-validation', 'auth-scenarios', 'error-handling'] }, "qe-test-generator"); // Load test await Task("API Load Test", { endpoint: '/orders', rps: 1000, duration: '5min' }, "qe-performance-tester"); // Security scan await Task("API Security Scan", { spec: 'openapi.yaml', checks: ['sql-injection', 'xss', 'broken-auth', 'rate-limiting'] }, "qe-security-scanner"); ``` --- ## Agent Coordination Hints ### Memory Namespace ``` aqe/api-testing/ ├── contracts/* - API contract definitions ├── generated-tests/* - Generated test suites ├── validation/* - Contract validation results └── performance/* - Load test results ``` ### Fleet Coordination ```typescript const apiFleet = await FleetManager.coordinate({ strategy: 'contract-testing', agents: ['qe-api-contract-validator', 'qe-test-generator', 'qe-test-executor'], topology: 'mesh' }); await apiFleet.execute({ services: [ { name: 'orders-api', consumers: ['checkout-ui', 'admin-api'] }, { name: 'payment-api', consumers: ['orders-api'] } ] }); ``` --- ## Related Skills - [agentic-quality-engineering](../agentic-quality-engineering/) - API testing with agents - [tdd-london-chicago](../tdd-london-chicago/) - London school for API testing - [performance-testing](../performance-testing/) - API load testing - [security-testing](../security-testing/) - API security validation - [contract-testing](../contract-testing/) - Consumer-driven contracts deep dive --- ## Remember API testing = verifying contracts and behavior, not implementation. Focus on what matters to consumers: correct responses, proper error handling, acceptable performance. **With Agents:** Agents automate contract validation, generate comprehensive test suites from specs, and monitor production APIs for drift. Use agents to maintain API quality at scale.
Voir sur GitHub