Skip to main content

prose

Author or edit any prose for the Toasty project — documentation, design docs, READMEs, PR descriptions, issue bodies, commit message bodies, or other human-readable text — following project writing conventions

Aller à l'installation

Informations de source

Dépôt
tokio-rs/toasty
Dernière activité de la source
23 mai 2026 à 07:57
Langue détectée de SKILL.md
anglais
Étoiles
3 177
Forks
142

Options d'installation

Le prompt qui vérifie d'abord la source est sélectionné par défaut. Vous pouvez passer à une commande directe ou télécharger une copie locale.

Vérifiez les fichiers source

Lisez SKILL.md et les fichiers associés affichés par SkillsMP avant de décider de l'installer.

Affichage de SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instructions source · Aperçu en lecture seule
name
prose
description
Author or edit any prose for the Toasty project — documentation, design docs, READMEs, PR descriptions, issue bodies, commit message bodies, or other human-readable text — following project writing conventions
# Writing Toasty Prose Load this skill whenever writing or editing prose for this project: documentation in `docs/`, READMEs, design docs, PR descriptions, issue bodies, commit message bodies, or any other human-readable markdown. ## Writing Style - **Be fact-focused**: State what things are and what they do - **Avoid buzzwords**: No "leverage", "synergy", "paradigm", etc. - **Avoid fluff**: Every sentence should convey information - **Avoid business jargon**: No "stakeholders", "deliverables", "action items" - **Avoid weasel words**: No "very", "really", "quite", "somewhat" - **Avoid dramatic terms**: No "critical", "crucial", "vital", "essential" unless something will actually break - **Avoid figurative metaphors**: Pick the literal word for the thing, not the analogy. "Features light up on PostgreSQL" → "Toasty enables features on PostgreSQL". "Query shape" → "query pattern" or "query form". Other recurring offenders: "under the hood" (just describe what's there), "out of the box" (just say "by default"), "first-class" (say what's actually supported), "magic" (say what the code does). If you can't replace the metaphor with a literal noun or verb without losing meaning, you probably don't know what you mean yet. - **Be direct**: Say what you mean without hedging - **Use concrete examples**: Show, don't tell - **Use active voice**: "The engine executes queries" not "Queries are executed by the engine" - **Use present tense**: Describe how the system works now, not how it was designed or how it will work - **Document current behavior only**: Omit historical decisions, deprecated approaches, and planned future work ### Examples **Bad**: "This component is critical for ensuring optimal query performance." **Good**: "This component optimizes queries by combining multiple database round-trips into one." **Bad**: "The simplification phase leverages various transformations to enhance query efficiency." **Good**: "The simplification phase rewrites association traversals into explicit subqueries." **Bad**: "Native arrays light up on PostgreSQL for `Vec<scalar>` fields." **Good**: "On PostgreSQL, `Vec<scalar>` fields use native array columns (`text[]`, `int8[]`, …)." **Bad**: "## Query shapes that work" **Good**: "## Supported queries" ## Document Structure - Start with what the thing is - Explain why it exists (what problem it solves) - Explain what it does - Show how to use it (if applicable) - Provide examples
Voir sur GitHub