Skip to main content

prose

Author or edit any prose for the Toasty project — documentation, design docs, READMEs, PR descriptions, issue bodies, commit message bodies, or other human-readable text — following project writing conventions

Ir para a instalação

Informações da origem

Repositório
tokio-rs/toasty
Última atividade na origem
23 de maio de 2026 às 07:57
Idioma detectado do SKILL.md
inglês
Estrelas
3.094
Forks
136

Opções de instalação

Por padrão, está selecionado o prompt que primeiro revisa a origem. Você pode mudar para um comando direto ou baixar uma cópia local.

Revise os arquivos de origem

Leia o SKILL.md e os arquivos complementares exibidos pelo SkillsMP antes de decidir se vai instalar.

Exibindo SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instruções da origem · Visualização somente leitura
name
prose
description
Author or edit any prose for the Toasty project — documentation, design docs, READMEs, PR descriptions, issue bodies, commit message bodies, or other human-readable text — following project writing conventions
# Writing Toasty Prose Load this skill whenever writing or editing prose for this project: documentation in `docs/`, READMEs, design docs, PR descriptions, issue bodies, commit message bodies, or any other human-readable markdown. ## Writing Style - **Be fact-focused**: State what things are and what they do - **Avoid buzzwords**: No "leverage", "synergy", "paradigm", etc. - **Avoid fluff**: Every sentence should convey information - **Avoid business jargon**: No "stakeholders", "deliverables", "action items" - **Avoid weasel words**: No "very", "really", "quite", "somewhat" - **Avoid dramatic terms**: No "critical", "crucial", "vital", "essential" unless something will actually break - **Avoid figurative metaphors**: Pick the literal word for the thing, not the analogy. "Features light up on PostgreSQL" → "Toasty enables features on PostgreSQL". "Query shape" → "query pattern" or "query form". Other recurring offenders: "under the hood" (just describe what's there), "out of the box" (just say "by default"), "first-class" (say what's actually supported), "magic" (say what the code does). If you can't replace the metaphor with a literal noun or verb without losing meaning, you probably don't know what you mean yet. - **Be direct**: Say what you mean without hedging - **Use concrete examples**: Show, don't tell - **Use active voice**: "The engine executes queries" not "Queries are executed by the engine" - **Use present tense**: Describe how the system works now, not how it was designed or how it will work - **Document current behavior only**: Omit historical decisions, deprecated approaches, and planned future work ### Examples **Bad**: "This component is critical for ensuring optimal query performance." **Good**: "This component optimizes queries by combining multiple database round-trips into one." **Bad**: "The simplification phase leverages various transformations to enhance query efficiency." **Good**: "The simplification phase rewrites association traversals into explicit subqueries." **Bad**: "Native arrays light up on PostgreSQL for `Vec<scalar>` fields." **Good**: "On PostgreSQL, `Vec<scalar>` fields use native array columns (`text[]`, `int8[]`, …)." **Bad**: "## Query shapes that work" **Good**: "## Supported queries" ## Document Structure - Start with what the thing is - Explain why it exists (what problem it solves) - Explain what it does - Show how to use it (if applicable) - Provide examples
Ver no GitHub