Skip to main content

review-fix-loop

Use when user says "review and fix", "review until clean", "run reviewer and fix", "keep reviewing until good", or wants iterative subagent review with automatic fixes applied between rounds. Works on specs, code, docs — any reviewable artifact.

Informations de source

Dépôt
webiny/data-mock
Dernière activité de la source
4 septembre 2026 à 10:12
Langue détectée de SKILL.md
anglais
Étoiles
1
Forks
0

Options d'installation

Le prompt qui vérifie d'abord la source est sélectionné par défaut. Vous pouvez passer à une commande directe ou télécharger une copie locale.

Vérifiez les fichiers source

Lisez SKILL.md et les fichiers associés affichés par SkillsMP avant de décider de l'installer.

Affichage de SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instructions source · Aperçu en lecture seule
name
review-fix-loop
description
Use when user says "review and fix", "review until clean", "run reviewer and fix", "keep reviewing until good", or wants iterative subagent review with automatic fixes applied between rounds. Works on specs, code, docs — any reviewable artifact.
# Review-Fix Loop Spawn a reviewer subagent, fix findings, re-review until clean. Max 5 rounds. ## Process ```dot digraph review_fix_loop { "Spawn reviewer" [shape=box]; "Findings?" [shape=diamond]; "Fix all findings" [shape=box]; "Max rounds?" [shape=diamond]; "Done — clean" [shape=doublecircle]; "Done — cap hit" [shape=doublecircle]; "Spawn reviewer" -> "Findings?"; "Findings?" -> "Done — clean" [label="none"]; "Findings?" -> "Fix all findings" [label="yes"]; "Fix all findings" -> "Max rounds?" ; "Max rounds?" -> "Spawn reviewer" [label="no"]; "Max rounds?" -> "Done — cap hit" [label="5 rounds"]; } ``` ### 1. First review Spawn a reviewer agent with: - Target file(s) and what to check - Instruction to verify against actual codebase (not just the file in isolation) - `run_in_background: false` (need results to proceed) ### 2. Fix Read findings. Apply all fixes to the file(s). No partial fixes — address every finding before re-reviewing. ### 3. Re-review Spawn reviewer again with: - Same target file(s) - List of what was fixed from previous round (so reviewer verifies fixes landed AND checks for new issues) - Same instruction to verify against codebase ### 4. Repeat or exit - **Clean (no findings):** Done. Report to user. - **Findings remain:** Fix and re-review (go to step 2). - **5 rounds reached:** Stop. Report remaining issues to user — something may need human judgment. ## Reviewer prompt template ``` [Review/Re-review] this [file type]: [path] [First round: describe what to check] [Re-review: list previous findings and which were fixed. Ask reviewer to verify fixes AND find new issues.] Check against actual codebase, not just the file text. [If clean, say "Clean — no issues."] ``` ## Key behaviors - **Always run reviewer synchronously** (`run_in_background: false`) — need findings before fixing. - **Fix ALL findings before re-review** — partial fixes waste review rounds. - **Pass previous findings to re-reviewer** — reviewer needs context to verify fixes and avoid re-reporting. - **Report round count** — tell user "Clean after N rounds" or "Stopped at 5 rounds, N issues remain."
Voir sur GitHub