Skip to main content

review-fix-loop

Use when user says "review and fix", "review until clean", "run reviewer and fix", "keep reviewing until good", or wants iterative subagent review with automatic fixes applied between rounds. Works on specs, code, docs — any reviewable artifact.

Informações da origem

Repositório
webiny/data-mock
Última atividade na origem
4 de setembro de 2026 às 10:12
Idioma detectado do SKILL.md
inglês
Estrelas
1
Forks
0

Opções de instalação

Por padrão, está selecionado o prompt que primeiro revisa a origem. Você pode mudar para um comando direto ou baixar uma cópia local.

Revise os arquivos de origem

Leia o SKILL.md e os arquivos complementares exibidos pelo SkillsMP antes de decidir se vai instalar.

Exibindo SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instruções da origem · Visualização somente leitura
name
review-fix-loop
description
Use when user says "review and fix", "review until clean", "run reviewer and fix", "keep reviewing until good", or wants iterative subagent review with automatic fixes applied between rounds. Works on specs, code, docs — any reviewable artifact.
# Review-Fix Loop Spawn a reviewer subagent, fix findings, re-review until clean. Max 5 rounds. ## Process ```dot digraph review_fix_loop { "Spawn reviewer" [shape=box]; "Findings?" [shape=diamond]; "Fix all findings" [shape=box]; "Max rounds?" [shape=diamond]; "Done — clean" [shape=doublecircle]; "Done — cap hit" [shape=doublecircle]; "Spawn reviewer" -> "Findings?"; "Findings?" -> "Done — clean" [label="none"]; "Findings?" -> "Fix all findings" [label="yes"]; "Fix all findings" -> "Max rounds?" ; "Max rounds?" -> "Spawn reviewer" [label="no"]; "Max rounds?" -> "Done — cap hit" [label="5 rounds"]; } ``` ### 1. First review Spawn a reviewer agent with: - Target file(s) and what to check - Instruction to verify against actual codebase (not just the file in isolation) - `run_in_background: false` (need results to proceed) ### 2. Fix Read findings. Apply all fixes to the file(s). No partial fixes — address every finding before re-reviewing. ### 3. Re-review Spawn reviewer again with: - Same target file(s) - List of what was fixed from previous round (so reviewer verifies fixes landed AND checks for new issues) - Same instruction to verify against codebase ### 4. Repeat or exit - **Clean (no findings):** Done. Report to user. - **Findings remain:** Fix and re-review (go to step 2). - **5 rounds reached:** Stop. Report remaining issues to user — something may need human judgment. ## Reviewer prompt template ``` [Review/Re-review] this [file type]: [path] [First round: describe what to check] [Re-review: list previous findings and which were fixed. Ask reviewer to verify fixes AND find new issues.] Check against actual codebase, not just the file text. [If clean, say "Clean — no issues."] ``` ## Key behaviors - **Always run reviewer synchronously** (`run_in_background: false`) — need findings before fixing. - **Fix ALL findings before re-review** — partial fixes waste review rounds. - **Pass previous findings to re-reviewer** — reviewer needs context to verify fixes and avoid re-reporting. - **Report round count** — tell user "Clean after N rounds" or "Stopped at 5 rounds, N issues remain."
Ver no GitHub