Skip to main content

eval-harness

Evaluation harness for testing agent and skill quality through structured benchmarks, regression tests, and quality scoring.

ソース情報

リポジトリ
a5c-ai/babysitter
ソースの最終更新活動
2026年6月1日 07:46
検出された SKILL.md の言語
英語
スター
1,813
フォーク
111

インストール方法

デフォルトでは、最初にソースを確認する Prompt が選択されています。直接コマンドに切り替えるか、ローカルコピーをダウンロードすることもできます。

ソースファイルを確認

インストールを決める前に、SKILL.md と SkillsMP に表示されている付属ファイルをお読みください。

ファイルエクスプローラー
2 ファイル

SKILL.md を表示中

SKILL.md
ソースの指示 · 読み取り専用プレビュー
name
eval-harness
description
Evaluation harness for testing agent and skill quality through structured benchmarks, regression tests, and quality scoring.
allowed-tools
Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Grep, Glob
graph
{"domains":["domain:software-engineering"],"skillAreas":["skill-area:agentic-loops","skill-area:orchestration-loop"],"workflows":["workflow:feature-development"],"topics":["topic:developer-experience"],"roles":["role:tech-lead","role:backend-engineer"]}
- Define test cases with known-correct outputs - Run agent against each test case - Score: accuracy, completeness, relevance - Compare against baseline performance - Track performance over time ### 2. Skill Quality Testing - Verify skill instructions produce expected outcomes - Test edge cases and boundary conditions - Measure consistency across multiple runs - Check for harmful or incorrect outputs - Validate against ground truth ### 3. Regression Suite - Collection of previously-passing test cases - Run after any agent/skill modification - Flag regressions with before/after comparison - Maintain pass rate threshold (>= 95%) ### 4. Process Verification - End-to-end process execution with known inputs - Verify each phase produces expected outputs - Check task ordering and dependency satisfaction - Measure total execution time ## Quality Scoring ### Accuracy Score (0-100) - Correctness of output vs expected - Partial credit for partially correct outputs - Penalty for hallucinated or fabricated content ### Completeness Score (0-100) - Coverage of required output elements - Missing sections flagged and scored - Bonus for useful additional context ### Consistency Score (0-100) - Run same input 3 times - Compare outputs for semantic similarity - Flag inconsistencies ### Composite Score - (accuracy * 0.4 + completeness * 0.3 + consistency * 0.3) - Threshold: 80 to pass ## When to Use - After creating new agents or skills - After modifying existing agents or skills - Periodic quality audits - Before promoting skills to production ## Agents Used - Used by process-level evaluation orchestrators - No specific agent dependency (evaluates other agents)
GitHubで見る