eval-harness
Evaluation harness for testing agent and skill quality through structured benchmarks, regression tests, and quality scoring.
ソース情報
- リポジトリ
- a5c-ai/babysitter
- ソースの最終更新活動
- 2026年6月1日 07:46
- 検出された SKILL.md の言語
- 英語
- スター
- 1,813
- フォーク
- 111
インストール方法
デフォルトでは、最初にソースを確認する Prompt が選択されています。直接コマンドに切り替えるか、ローカルコピーをダウンロードすることもできます。
ソースファイルを確認
インストールを決める前に、SKILL.md と SkillsMP に表示されている付属ファイルをお読みください。
ファイルエクスプローラー
2 ファイルSKILL.md を表示中
SKILL.md
ソースの指示 · 読み取り専用プレビュー- name
- eval-harness
- description
- Evaluation harness for testing agent and skill quality through structured benchmarks, regression tests, and quality scoring.
- allowed-tools
- Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Grep, Glob
- graph
- {"domains":["domain:software-engineering"],"skillAreas":["skill-area:agentic-loops","skill-area:orchestration-loop"],"workflows":["workflow:feature-development"],"topics":["topic:developer-experience"],"roles":["role:tech-lead","role:backend-engineer"]}
- Define test cases with known-correct outputs
- Run agent against each test case
- Score: accuracy, completeness, relevance
- Compare against baseline performance
- Track performance over time
### 2. Skill Quality Testing
- Verify skill instructions produce expected outcomes
- Test edge cases and boundary conditions
- Measure consistency across multiple runs
- Check for harmful or incorrect outputs
- Validate against ground truth
### 3. Regression Suite
- Collection of previously-passing test cases
- Run after any agent/skill modification
- Flag regressions with before/after comparison
- Maintain pass rate threshold (>= 95%)
### 4. Process Verification
- End-to-end process execution with known inputs
- Verify each phase produces expected outputs
- Check task ordering and dependency satisfaction
- Measure total execution time
## Quality Scoring
### Accuracy Score (0-100)
- Correctness of output vs expected
- Partial credit for partially correct outputs
- Penalty for hallucinated or fabricated content
### Completeness Score (0-100)
- Coverage of required output elements
- Missing sections flagged and scored
- Bonus for useful additional context
### Consistency Score (0-100)
- Run same input 3 times
- Compare outputs for semantic similarity
- Flag inconsistencies
### Composite Score
- (accuracy * 0.4 + completeness * 0.3 + consistency * 0.3)
- Threshold: 80 to pass
## When to Use
- After creating new agents or skills
- After modifying existing agents or skills
- Periodic quality audits
- Before promoting skills to production
## Agents Used
- Used by process-level evaluation orchestrators
- No specific agent dependency (evaluates other agents)
GitHubで見る