Skip to main content

eval-harness

Evaluation harness for testing agent and skill quality through structured benchmarks, regression tests, and quality scoring.

소스 정보

저장소
a5c-ai/babysitter
최근 소스 활동
2026년 6월 1일 07:46
감지된 SKILL.md 언어
영어
스타
1,813
포크
111

설치 방법

기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.

소스 파일 검토

설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.

파일 탐색기
2 개 파일

SKILL.md 표시 중

SKILL.md
소스 지침 · 읽기 전용 미리보기
name
eval-harness
description
Evaluation harness for testing agent and skill quality through structured benchmarks, regression tests, and quality scoring.
allowed-tools
Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Grep, Glob
graph
{"domains":["domain:software-engineering"],"skillAreas":["skill-area:agentic-loops","skill-area:orchestration-loop"],"workflows":["workflow:feature-development"],"topics":["topic:developer-experience"],"roles":["role:tech-lead","role:backend-engineer"]}
- Define test cases with known-correct outputs - Run agent against each test case - Score: accuracy, completeness, relevance - Compare against baseline performance - Track performance over time ### 2. Skill Quality Testing - Verify skill instructions produce expected outcomes - Test edge cases and boundary conditions - Measure consistency across multiple runs - Check for harmful or incorrect outputs - Validate against ground truth ### 3. Regression Suite - Collection of previously-passing test cases - Run after any agent/skill modification - Flag regressions with before/after comparison - Maintain pass rate threshold (>= 95%) ### 4. Process Verification - End-to-end process execution with known inputs - Verify each phase produces expected outputs - Check task ordering and dependency satisfaction - Measure total execution time ## Quality Scoring ### Accuracy Score (0-100) - Correctness of output vs expected - Partial credit for partially correct outputs - Penalty for hallucinated or fabricated content ### Completeness Score (0-100) - Coverage of required output elements - Missing sections flagged and scored - Bonus for useful additional context ### Consistency Score (0-100) - Run same input 3 times - Compare outputs for semantic similarity - Flag inconsistencies ### Composite Score - (accuracy * 0.4 + completeness * 0.3 + consistency * 0.3) - Threshold: 80 to pass ## When to Use - After creating new agents or skills - After modifying existing agents or skills - Periodic quality audits - Before promoting skills to production ## Agents Used - Used by process-level evaluation orchestrators - No specific agent dependency (evaluates other agents)
GitHub에서 보기