Skip to main content

evaluate-military-opportunity

Use when assessing whether to attack a seemingly weakened adversary. Provides a risk-assessment framework covering hidden enemy strengths, battle-hardened populations, diplomatic consequences, and multi-advisor consultation to avoid costly miscalculations.

インストールへ移動

ソース情報

リポジトリ
baojie/shiji-kb
ソースの最終更新活動
2026年3月25日 08:27
検出された SKILL.md の言語
英語
スター
3,339
フォーク
528

インストール方法

デフォルトでは、最初にソースを確認する Prompt が選択されています。直接コマンドに切り替えるか、ローカルコピーをダウンロードすることもできます。

ソースファイルを確認

インストールを決める前に、SKILL.md と SkillsMP に表示されている付属ファイルをお読みください。

ファイルエクスプローラー
2 ファイル

SKILL.md を表示中

SKILL.md
ソースの指示 · 読み取り専用プレビュー
name
evaluate-military-opportunity
description
Use when assessing whether to attack a seemingly weakened adversary. Provides a risk-assessment framework covering hidden enemy strengths, battle-hardened populations, diplomatic consequences, and multi-advisor consultation to avoid costly miscalculations.
# Evaluate Military Opportunity ## Overview A framework for assessing military risks, particularly when an opponent appears vulnerable but may have hidden strengths. ## Decision Points ### Warning Signs to Investigate 1. **Battle-hardened population**: Has the adversary recently experienced war? Their civilians may be more prepared than expected. 2. **Geographic position**: Is the country positioned where it has had to fight multiple enemies? This breeds military experience. 3. **Recent losses context**: If they lost many soldiers, are the survivors and new generation now motivated and trained? ### Questions to Ask - What is the actual combat experience of their population? - What advantages do they possess despite apparent weakness? - What is the force ratio truly required for success? ## Steps 1. **Gather intelligence on enemy capabilities** - Do not assume apparent weakness equals actual weakness 2. **Consult multiple advisors** - Seek dissenting opinions, not just those who agree 3. **Consider diplomatic consequences** - Have you recently established friendly relations? - Breaking trust damages reputation 4. **Evaluate the "unlucky" signs** - Breaking recent agreements for opportunistic attack often fails ## Expected Outcomes - Avoid costly military defeats from underestimating opponents - Maintain diplomatic credibility - Make decisions based on realistic assessment rather than wishful thinking ## Verification 1. Confirm that intelligence on enemy capabilities has been gathered from multiple independent sources, not just optimistic reports. 2. Validate that dissenting opinions were actively sought and considered before the decision. 3. Check whether recent agreements or treaties would be violated, and assess the reputational cost of breaking them.
GitHubで見る