Skip to main content

evaluate-military-opportunity

Use when assessing whether to attack a seemingly weakened adversary. Provides a risk-assessment framework covering hidden enemy strengths, battle-hardened populations, diplomatic consequences, and multi-advisor consultation to avoid costly miscalculations.

Ir para a instalação

Informações da origem

Repositório
baojie/shiji-kb
Última atividade na origem
25 de março de 2026 às 08:27
Idioma detectado do SKILL.md
inglês
Estrelas
3.339
Forks
528

Opções de instalação

Por padrão, está selecionado o prompt que primeiro revisa a origem. Você pode mudar para um comando direto ou baixar uma cópia local.

Revise os arquivos de origem

Leia o SKILL.md e os arquivos complementares exibidos pelo SkillsMP antes de decidir se vai instalar.

Explorador de arquivos
2 arquivos

Exibindo SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instruções da origem · Visualização somente leitura
name
evaluate-military-opportunity
description
Use when assessing whether to attack a seemingly weakened adversary. Provides a risk-assessment framework covering hidden enemy strengths, battle-hardened populations, diplomatic consequences, and multi-advisor consultation to avoid costly miscalculations.
# Evaluate Military Opportunity ## Overview A framework for assessing military risks, particularly when an opponent appears vulnerable but may have hidden strengths. ## Decision Points ### Warning Signs to Investigate 1. **Battle-hardened population**: Has the adversary recently experienced war? Their civilians may be more prepared than expected. 2. **Geographic position**: Is the country positioned where it has had to fight multiple enemies? This breeds military experience. 3. **Recent losses context**: If they lost many soldiers, are the survivors and new generation now motivated and trained? ### Questions to Ask - What is the actual combat experience of their population? - What advantages do they possess despite apparent weakness? - What is the force ratio truly required for success? ## Steps 1. **Gather intelligence on enemy capabilities** - Do not assume apparent weakness equals actual weakness 2. **Consult multiple advisors** - Seek dissenting opinions, not just those who agree 3. **Consider diplomatic consequences** - Have you recently established friendly relations? - Breaking trust damages reputation 4. **Evaluate the "unlucky" signs** - Breaking recent agreements for opportunistic attack often fails ## Expected Outcomes - Avoid costly military defeats from underestimating opponents - Maintain diplomatic credibility - Make decisions based on realistic assessment rather than wishful thinking ## Verification 1. Confirm that intelligence on enemy capabilities has been gathered from multiple independent sources, not just optimistic reports. 2. Validate that dissenting opinions were actively sought and considered before the decision. 3. Check whether recent agreements or treaties would be violated, and assess the reputational cost of breaking them.
Ver no GitHub