| name | skill-architect |
| description | Design, create, audit, and improve Claude Agent Skills with expert-level progressive disclosure. Use when building new skills, reviewing existing skills, debugging activation failures, encoding domain expertise, designing skills for subagent consumption, or understanding platform constraints and distribution surfaces. NOT for general Claude Code features, runtime debugging, non-skill coding, or MCP server implementation. |
| allowed-tools | Read,Write,Edit,Bash,Grep,Glob |
| argument-hint | [skill-path-or-name] [action: create|audit|improve|debug] |
| metadata | {"category":"Productivity & Meta","tags":["architect","create-skill","improve-skill","skill-audit"],"pairs-with":[{"skill":"skill-creator","reason":"The architect designs skill structure; the creator guides implementation following those patterns"},{"skill":"skill-grader","reason":"Grading feedback identifies architectural weaknesses that the architect addresses"},{"skill":"skill-documentarian","reason":"Documentation standards complement architectural design for complete skill delivery"}]} |
Skill Architect: The Authoritative Meta-Skill
The unified authority for creating expert-level Agent Skills. Encodes the knowledge that separates a skill that merely exists from one that activates precisely, teaches efficiently, and makes users productive immediately.
Philosophy
Great skills are progressive disclosure machines. They encode real domain expertise (shibboleths), not surface instructions. They follow a three-layer architecture: lightweight metadata for discovery, lean SKILL.md for core process, and reference files for deep dives loaded only on demand.
When to Use This Skill
- Creating new skills from scratch or from existing expertise
- Auditing/reviewing skills for quality, activation, and progressive disclosure
- Improving activation rates and reducing false positives
- Encoding domain expertise (shibboleths, anti-patterns, temporal knowledge)
- Designing skills that subagents consume effectively
- Building self-contained tools (scripts, MCPs, subagents)
- Debugging why skills don't activate or activate incorrectly
NOT for: General Claude Code features (slash commands, MCP server implementation), non-skill coding advice or code review, debugging runtime errors (use domain-specific skills), template generation without real domain expertise to encode.
Quick Wins (Immediate Improvements)
For existing skills, apply in priority order:
- Tighten description -- Follow
[What] [When to use]. NOT for [Exclusions] formula
- Check line count -- SKILL.md must be <500 lines; move depth to
/references
- Add NOT clause -- Prevent false activation with explicit exclusions
- Add 1-2 anti-patterns -- Use shibboleth template (Novice/Expert/Timeline)
- Remove dead files -- Delete unreferenced files in
scripts/ and references/ (no phantoms)
- Test activation -- Write 5 queries that should trigger and 5 that shouldn't
Progressive Disclosure Architecture
Skills use three-layer loading. The runtime scans metadata at startup, loads SKILL.md on activation, and pulls reference files only when the agent decides it needs them.
| Layer | Content | Size | Loading |
|---|
| 1. Metadata | name + description in frontmatter | ~100 tokens | Always in context (catalog scan) |
| 2. SKILL.md | Core process, decision trees, brief anti-patterns | <5k tokens | On skill activation |
| 3. References | Deep dives, examples, templates, specs | Unlimited | On-demand, per-file, only when relevant |
Critical rules:
- Keep SKILL.md under 500 lines. Move depth to
/references.
- Reference files are NOT auto-loaded. Only SKILL.md enters context on activation.
- In SKILL.md, list each reference file with a 1-line description of when to consult it.
- Never instruct "read all reference files before starting." Instead: "Read only the files relevant to the current step."
Frontmatter Rules
Required Fields
| Key | Purpose | Constraints |
|---|
name | Lowercase-hyphenated identifier | Max 64 chars, a-z/0-9/hyphens only, no "anthropic" or "claude", no XML tags |
description | Activation trigger: [What] [When to use]. NOT for [Exclusions] | Max 1024 chars, no XML tags. See Description Formula |
Optional Fields
| Key | Purpose | Example |
|---|
allowed-tools | Comma-separated tool names (least privilege) | Read,Write,Grep |
argument-hint | Hint shown in autocomplete for expected arguments | "[path] [format]" |
license | License identifier | MIT |
disable-model-invocation | If true, only user-triggered via /skill-name | true |
user-invocable | Controls whether skill appears in UI menus | true |
context | Execution context; fork runs skill in isolated subagent | fork |
agent | Which subagent type when context: fork | code-reviewer |
model | Override model when skill is active | sonnet |
hooks | Hooks scoped to this skill's lifecycle | See hooks reference |
metadata | Arbitrary key-value map for tooling/dashboards | author: your-org |
Custom Keys (Safe to Use)
Custom keys like category, tags, version are ignored by Claude Code but safe to include for your own tooling (gallery websites, documentation generators, dashboards). Place them inside the metadata: block to keep them organized and avoid confusion with real runtime keys.
Invalid Keys (Confusingly Similar to Valid Ones)
tools: Read,Write
integrates_with: [...]
outputs: [...]
dependencies: [...]
bundled-resources: [...]
Common mistakes that prevent loading: tools: instead of allowed-tools: (silently ignored), YAML list syntax [Read, Write] in allowed-tools (use comma-separated string), name with spaces/uppercase (use lowercase-hyphenated), name not matching directory name (causes activation mismatch). Run python scripts/validate_skill.py <path> to catch all of these.
Platform constraints (name: 64 chars, description: 1024 chars, upload: 8MB, 8 skills/request max, no XML tags): See references/claude-extension-taxonomy.md for full details. Skills do NOT sync across Claude.ai, Claude API, and Claude Code -- maintain Git as single source of truth.
Description Formula
Pattern: [What it does] [When to use -- be slightly pushy]. NOT for [Exclusions].
The description is the most important line for activation. Claude's runtime scans descriptions to decide which skill to load. Claude evaluates descriptions semantically, not via keyword matching. It reasons about whether your description covers the user's intent. Claude also tends to undertrigger -- make descriptions slightly pushy to combat this.
| Problem | Bad | Good |
|---|
| Too vague | "Helps with images" | "CLIP semantic search for image-text matching and zero-shot classification. NOT for counting, spatial reasoning, or generation." |
| No exclusions | "Reviews code changes" | "Reviews TypeScript/React diffs and PRs for correctness. NOT for writing new features." |
| Catch-all | "Helps with product management" | "Writes and refines product requirement documents (PRDs). NOT for strategy decks." |
Full guide with more examples: See references/description-guide.md
SKILL.md Template
---
name: your-skill-name
description: [What it does] [When to use -- be slightly pushy]. NOT for [Exclusions].
allowed-tools: Read,Write
---
# Skill Name
[One sentence purpose]
## When to Use
Use for: [A, B, C with specific trigger keywords]
NOT for: [D, E, F -- explicit boundaries]
## Core Process
[Mermaid diagrams for decisions/flows. See visual-artifacts.md for catalog]
## Anti-Patterns
### [Pattern Name]
**Novice**: [Wrong assumption]
**Expert**: [Why it's wrong + correct approach]
**Timeline**: [When this changed, if temporal]
## References
- `references/guide.md` -- Consult when [specific situation]
- `references/examples.md` -- Consult for [worked examples of X]
The 6-Step Skill Creation Process
flowchart LR
S1[1. Gather Examples] --> S2[2. Plan Contents]
S2 --> S3[3. Initialize]
S3 --> S4[4. Write Skill]
S4 --> S5[5. Validate]
S5 --> S6{Errors?}
S6 -->|Yes| S4
S6 -->|No| S7[6. Ship & Iterate]
Step 1: Gather Concrete Examples
Collect 3-5 real queries that should trigger this skill, and 3-5 that should NOT.
Step 2: Plan Reusable Contents
Identify scripts, references, assets that prevent re-work. Also identify shibboleths: domain algorithms, temporal knowledge, framework evolution, common pitfalls.
Step 3: Initialize
scripts/init_skill.py <skill-name> --path <output-directory>
Step 4: Write the Skill
Order: Scripts first (working code) -> References next (domain knowledge) -> SKILL.md last (core process, reference index).
Write in imperative form: "To accomplish X, do Y" not "You should do X."
Step 5: Validate
python scripts/validate_skill.py <path>
python scripts/check_self_contained.py <path>
Fix ERRORS then WARNINGS then SUGGESTIONS.
Step 6: Iterate
After real-world use: notice struggles, improve SKILL.md and resources, update CHANGELOG.md.
Designing Skills for Subagent Consumption
Three Skill-Loading Layers
- Preloaded (2-5 core skills): Injected into the subagent's system context.
- Dynamically selected: Subagent receives a catalog (name + 1-line description) and picks 1-3 matching skills.
- Execution-time: Subagent reads each skill's "When to use" section, follows numbered steps, respects output contracts, runs QA checks.
Subagent Prompt Structure
Four sections: Identity (narrow role), Skill usage rules (skills as standard operating procedures), Task loop (restate, select skills, plan, execute, validate, return), Constraints (quality bar, safety, tie-breaking).
Full templates and orchestration patterns: See references/subagent-design.md
Visual Artifacts: Mermaid Diagrams
For humans, diagrams render as visual flowcharts, state machines, and timelines. For agents, Mermaid is a text-based graph DSL -- A -->|Yes| B is an explicit, unambiguous edge. Both audiences benefit.
Rule: If a skill describes a process, decision tree, architecture, state machine, or data relationship, include a Mermaid diagram.
| Skill Content | Diagram Type | Syntax |
|---|
| Decision trees / troubleshooting | Flowchart | flowchart TD |
| API/agent communication protocols | Sequence | sequenceDiagram |
| Lifecycle / status transitions | State | stateDiagram-v2 |
| Temporal knowledge / evolution | Timeline | timeline |
| Data models / schemas | ER | erDiagram |
| Domain taxonomy / concept maps | Mindmap | mindmap |
| Priority matrices (2-axis) | Quadrant | quadrantChart |
| Infrastructure / cloud topology | Architecture | architecture-beta |
Full catalog (all 23 types) with syntax, examples, and YAML config: See references/visual-artifacts.md
Encoding Shibboleths
Expert knowledge that separates novices from experts. Things LLMs get wrong due to outdated training data or cargo-culted patterns.
Shibboleth Template
### Anti-Pattern: [Name]
**Novice**: "[Wrong assumption]"
**Expert**: [Why it's wrong, with evidence]
**Timeline**: [Date]: [Old way] -> [Date]: [New way]
**LLM mistake**: [Why LLMs suggest the old pattern]
**Detection**: [How to spot this in code/config]
Full catalog with case studies: See references/antipatterns.md
Self-Contained Tools and the Extension Taxonomy
Skills are one of seven Claude extension types. Most skills should include scripts. MCPs are only for auth/state boundaries. Plugins are for sharing skills across teams/community.
| Need | Extension Type | Key Requirement |
|---|
| Domain expertise / process | Skill (SKILL.md) | Decision trees, anti-patterns, output contracts |
| Packaging & distribution | Plugin (plugin.json) | Bundles skills + hooks + MCP + agents |
| External API + auth | MCP Server | Working server + setup README |
| Repeatable local operation | Script | Actually runs (not a template), minimal deps |
| Multi-step orchestration | Subagent | 4-section prompt, skills, workflow |
| User-triggered action | Slash Command | Skill with user-invocable: true |
| Lifecycle automation | Hook | 17+ events: PreToolUse, PostToolUse, Stop, etc. |
| Programmatic access | Agent SDK | npm/pip package, CI/CD pipelines |
Full taxonomy with examples and common mistakes: See references/claude-extension-taxonomy.md
Detailed tool patterns: See references/self-contained-tools.md
Plugin creation and distribution: See references/plugin-architecture.md
Tool Permissions (Least Privilege)
| Access Level | allowed-tools |
|---|
| Read-only | Read,Grep,Glob |
| File modifier | Read,Write,Edit |
| Build integration | Read,Write,Bash(npm:*,git:*) |
| Never for untrusted | Unrestricted Bash |
Anti-Pattern Summary
| # | Anti-Pattern | Fix |
|---|
| 1 | Documentation Dump | Decision trees in SKILL.md, depth in /references |
| 2 | Missing NOT clause | Always include "NOT for X, Y, Z" in description |
| 3 | Phantom Tools | Only reference files that exist and work |
| 4 | Template Soup | Ship working code or nothing |
| 5 | Overly Permissive Tools | Least privilege: specific tool list, scoped Bash |
| 6 | Stale Temporal Knowledge | Date all advice, update quarterly |
| 7 | Catch-All Skill | Split by expertise type, not domain |
| 8 | Vague Description | Use [What] [When to use]. NOT for [Exclusions] |
| 9 | Eager Loading | Never "read all files first"; lazy-load references |
| 10 | Prose-Only Processes | Use Mermaid diagrams for decisions, workflows, architectures |
Full case studies: See references/antipatterns.md
Validation Checklist
[ ] SKILL.md exists and is <500 lines
[ ] Frontmatter has name + description (minimum required)
[ ] Description follows [What][When to use] NOT [Exclusions] formula
[ ] Description is specific and context-rich (semantic activation, not keyword lists)
[ ] Name and description are aligned (not contradictory)
[ ] At least 1 anti-pattern with shibboleth template
[ ] All referenced files actually exist (no phantoms)
[ ] Scripts work (not templates), have clear CLI, handle errors
[ ] Reference files each have a 1-line purpose in SKILL.md
[ ] Processes/decisions/lifecycles use Mermaid diagrams, not prose
[ ] CHANGELOG.md tracks version history
[ ] If subagent-consumed: output contracts are defined
[ ] Skill passes its own validation tools (meta-consistency)
Run automated checks: python scripts/validate_skill.py <path> and python scripts/validate_mermaid.py <path>
Success Metrics
| Metric | Target |
|---|
| Correct activation | >90% |
| False positive rate | <5% |
| Token usage | <5k tokens |
| Time to productive | <5 min |
Reference Files
Consult these for deep dives -- they are NOT loaded by default:
| File | Consult When |
|---|
references/knowledge-engineering.md | KE methods for extracting expert knowledge into skills |
references/description-guide.md | Writing or rewriting a skill description |
references/antipatterns.md | Looking for shibboleths, case studies, or temporal patterns |
references/self-contained-tools.md | Adding scripts, MCP servers, or subagents to a skill |
references/subagent-design.md | Designing skills for subagent consumption or orchestration |
references/claude-extension-taxonomy.md | Skills vs Plugins vs MCPs vs Hooks vs Agent SDK |
references/plugin-architecture.md | Creating, packaging, and distributing plugins |
references/visual-artifacts.md | Adding Mermaid diagrams: all 23 types, YAML config |
references/mcp-template.md | Building an MCP server for a skill |
references/subagent-template.md | Defining subagent prompts and multi-agent pipelines |
references/scoring-rubric.md | Quantitative skill evaluation (0-10 scoring criteria) |
references/skill-composition.md | Cross-skill dependencies and composition patterns |
references/skill-lifecycle.md | Maintenance, versioning, and deprecation guidance |
references/activation-debugging.md | Diagnosing why skills don't activate or false-positive |
agents/cross-evaluator.md | Template for cross-evaluating skills |
