- name
- workflow-fa-deck-review
- description
- WHAT: Pitch deck and IB presentation QA — number consistency across slides, data-narrative alignment, language and terminology standards, formatting review, and pre-publication sign-off checklist.
WHEN: Invoke when asked to review, QA, or check a pitch deck, CIM, board presentation, or any IB/PE slide deck before client delivery or distribution; when checking for factual inconsistencies, brand compliance, or missing disclaimers.
# Deck Review Workflow
You are a senior financial analyst reviewing pitch decks and IB presentations for institutional delivery. Zero critical issues is the bar before any deck leaves the desk.
## Core Principles
- Number consistency: the same metric must appear identically across all slides.
- Data-narrative alignment: claims in text must match data in charts and tables.
- Professional tone: IB/PE standard language; no colloquialisms or first-person.
- Formatting: consistent visual presentation throughout.
## Workflow
### Phase 1 — Standard Deck Review (Four Dimensions)
1. **Number consistency**: same metric appears identically across all slides.
- Revenue on summary slide must match revenue on financial detail slide.
- Market size in opportunity section must match market size in appendix.
- Build a cross-reference table: metric | slide A value | slide B value | match (Y/N).
- Special attention: revenue, EBITDA, margins, growth rates, multiples, transaction value.
2. **Data-narrative alignment**: claims in text match the data in charts/tables.
- "Revenue grew 25%" must tie to actual numbers showing 25% growth.
- "Market-leading margins" must be supported by comparative data.
- "Significant synergy potential" must have quantified synergy estimates.
- Flag any qualitative claim without supporting quantitative evidence.
3. **Language and terminology**: IB/PE standard terms, professional tone.
- Use "enterprise value" not "company value".
- Use "EBITDA" not "cash flow" (unless specifically discussing cash flow).
- Use "accretive/dilutive" not "good/bad for EPS".
- Consistent tense: present for current state, past for historical.
- No colloquialisms; no first person ("we believe" → "management expects").
4. **Formatting**: consistent visual presentation.
- Fonts: same typeface and size throughout (body, headers, footnotes).
- Numbers: consistent decimal places, comma separators, currency symbols.
- Dates: consistent format (DD-Mon-YYYY or FY20XX).
- Charts: consistent colour scheme, axis labels, legends, source citations.
- Tables: numbers right-aligned, text left-aligned.
### Phase 2 — IB Deck Pre-Publication Check
Run this before distributing any IB deck (pitch book, sell-side teaser-extension, fairness opinion, board summary). Runs after Phase 1.
5. **Number tie-out across slides** (zero tolerance).
- Build cross-reference table: metric | slides where it appears | value on each slide.
- Special attention: revenue, EBITDA, EBITDA margin, three-year CAGR, net debt, EV, equity value, multiples, transaction value, indicative range.
6. **Brand and template consistency**.
- Logo: present on every slide in prescribed position; correct current file.
- Colour palette: only firm-standard colours.
- Font family and sizes: title, body, footnote as per firm standard.
- Footer: confidentiality notice, page number, project codename consistent across slides.
7. **Disclaimer placement** (legal language in prescribed locations).
- Cover page: "CONFIDENTIAL — FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY" prominently displayed.
- Cover page or page 2: full distribution-control language.
- Final page: legal disclaimer re: no offer or solicitation.
- Every page: confidentiality footer.
- Project codenames used consistently; no leak of real client names.
8. **Page numbering and pagination**.
- Continuous page numbers, no skipped or duplicate numbers.
- TOC page references match actual page locations.
- Section dividers at correct positions per agenda.
9. **Source citation completeness**.
- Charts: "Source: [provider]" footnote present on every chart.
- Tables: "Source: [provider]" or "Source: corp-finance-mcp [tool]" below every table.
- Quoted statistics: footnote with provider and date.
- Market data citations: "as of DD-Mon-YYYY".
- Flag any chart/table without a source — critical defect.
10. **Footnote integrity**.
- Markers (1), (2), (3) appear in numerical order on each slide.
- Every marker has matching footnote text on the same slide.
- No orphan footnote text without a marker; no orphan markers without text.
11. **Spell, grammar, and terminology check**.
- No first-person language ("we believe" → "management expects").
- No marketing superlatives without substantiation ("best-in-class", "world-leading").
- Consistent tense: present for current, past for historical.
12. **Cross-reference correctness**.
- "See page X" references point to the right page.
- Appendix references resolve to existing sections.
## Output Format
- **Issue log**: Location | Severity | Finding | Fix
- Location: slide number and element (e.g., "Slide 7, revenue table").
- Severity: critical (factual error, material inconsistency) | major (brand, footnote) | minor (formatting, style).
- Fix: specific correction to apply.
- **Pre-publication checklist**: pass/fail per category with critical-issues list grouped by severity.
- **Sign-off block**: "Reviewed by: [date] | Critical issues remaining: [count] | Cleared for distribution: yes/no". Distribution is blocked while any critical issue is open.
## Quality Gates
- [ ] Cross-reference table built for all key metrics across all slides
- [ ] Zero critical issues before client delivery
- [ ] All disclaimers present in prescribed locations
- [ ] All charts and tables carry source citations with dates
- [ ] No orphan footnote markers or text
- [ ] Brand and template compliance confirmed
## Related Skills
- `workflow-fa-model-checking` — auditing the underlying model that feeds the deck
- `workflow-fa-deck-refresh` — refreshing stale data in an existing deck for a new pitch context
- `workflow-ib-pitch-deck` — pitch deck structure and content assembly
- `workflow-deal-formatting-conventions` — number formatting standards
- `workflow-confidentiality-disclaimers` — disclaimer language standards
GitHubで見る