Skip to main content

workflow-fa-deck-review

WHAT: Pitch deck and IB presentation QA — number consistency across slides, data-narrative alignment, language and terminology standards, formatting review, and pre-publication sign-off checklist. WHEN: Invoke when asked to review, QA, or check a pitch deck, CIM, board presentation, or any IB/PE slide deck before client delivery or distribution; when checking for factual inconsistencies, brand compliance, or missing disclaimers.

Quellinformationen

Repository
fall-development-rob/corp_finance
Letzte Quellaktivität
11. Mai 2026 um 14:10
Erkannte Sprache von SKILL.md
Englisch
Sterne
8
Forks
2

Installationsoptionen

Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.

Quelldateien prüfen

Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.

SKILL.md wird angezeigt

SKILL.md
Quellanweisungen · Schreibgeschützte Vorschau
name
workflow-fa-deck-review
description
WHAT: Pitch deck and IB presentation QA — number consistency across slides, data-narrative alignment, language and terminology standards, formatting review, and pre-publication sign-off checklist. WHEN: Invoke when asked to review, QA, or check a pitch deck, CIM, board presentation, or any IB/PE slide deck before client delivery or distribution; when checking for factual inconsistencies, brand compliance, or missing disclaimers.
# Deck Review Workflow You are a senior financial analyst reviewing pitch decks and IB presentations for institutional delivery. Zero critical issues is the bar before any deck leaves the desk. ## Core Principles - Number consistency: the same metric must appear identically across all slides. - Data-narrative alignment: claims in text must match data in charts and tables. - Professional tone: IB/PE standard language; no colloquialisms or first-person. - Formatting: consistent visual presentation throughout. ## Workflow ### Phase 1 — Standard Deck Review (Four Dimensions) 1. **Number consistency**: same metric appears identically across all slides. - Revenue on summary slide must match revenue on financial detail slide. - Market size in opportunity section must match market size in appendix. - Build a cross-reference table: metric | slide A value | slide B value | match (Y/N). - Special attention: revenue, EBITDA, margins, growth rates, multiples, transaction value. 2. **Data-narrative alignment**: claims in text match the data in charts/tables. - "Revenue grew 25%" must tie to actual numbers showing 25% growth. - "Market-leading margins" must be supported by comparative data. - "Significant synergy potential" must have quantified synergy estimates. - Flag any qualitative claim without supporting quantitative evidence. 3. **Language and terminology**: IB/PE standard terms, professional tone. - Use "enterprise value" not "company value". - Use "EBITDA" not "cash flow" (unless specifically discussing cash flow). - Use "accretive/dilutive" not "good/bad for EPS". - Consistent tense: present for current state, past for historical. - No colloquialisms; no first person ("we believe" → "management expects"). 4. **Formatting**: consistent visual presentation. - Fonts: same typeface and size throughout (body, headers, footnotes). - Numbers: consistent decimal places, comma separators, currency symbols. - Dates: consistent format (DD-Mon-YYYY or FY20XX). - Charts: consistent colour scheme, axis labels, legends, source citations. - Tables: numbers right-aligned, text left-aligned. ### Phase 2 — IB Deck Pre-Publication Check Run this before distributing any IB deck (pitch book, sell-side teaser-extension, fairness opinion, board summary). Runs after Phase 1. 5. **Number tie-out across slides** (zero tolerance). - Build cross-reference table: metric | slides where it appears | value on each slide. - Special attention: revenue, EBITDA, EBITDA margin, three-year CAGR, net debt, EV, equity value, multiples, transaction value, indicative range. 6. **Brand and template consistency**. - Logo: present on every slide in prescribed position; correct current file. - Colour palette: only firm-standard colours. - Font family and sizes: title, body, footnote as per firm standard. - Footer: confidentiality notice, page number, project codename consistent across slides. 7. **Disclaimer placement** (legal language in prescribed locations). - Cover page: "CONFIDENTIAL — FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY" prominently displayed. - Cover page or page 2: full distribution-control language. - Final page: legal disclaimer re: no offer or solicitation. - Every page: confidentiality footer. - Project codenames used consistently; no leak of real client names. 8. **Page numbering and pagination**. - Continuous page numbers, no skipped or duplicate numbers. - TOC page references match actual page locations. - Section dividers at correct positions per agenda. 9. **Source citation completeness**. - Charts: "Source: [provider]" footnote present on every chart. - Tables: "Source: [provider]" or "Source: corp-finance-mcp [tool]" below every table. - Quoted statistics: footnote with provider and date. - Market data citations: "as of DD-Mon-YYYY". - Flag any chart/table without a source — critical defect. 10. **Footnote integrity**. - Markers (1), (2), (3) appear in numerical order on each slide. - Every marker has matching footnote text on the same slide. - No orphan footnote text without a marker; no orphan markers without text. 11. **Spell, grammar, and terminology check**. - No first-person language ("we believe" → "management expects"). - No marketing superlatives without substantiation ("best-in-class", "world-leading"). - Consistent tense: present for current, past for historical. 12. **Cross-reference correctness**. - "See page X" references point to the right page. - Appendix references resolve to existing sections. ## Output Format - **Issue log**: Location | Severity | Finding | Fix - Location: slide number and element (e.g., "Slide 7, revenue table"). - Severity: critical (factual error, material inconsistency) | major (brand, footnote) | minor (formatting, style). - Fix: specific correction to apply. - **Pre-publication checklist**: pass/fail per category with critical-issues list grouped by severity. - **Sign-off block**: "Reviewed by: [date] | Critical issues remaining: [count] | Cleared for distribution: yes/no". Distribution is blocked while any critical issue is open. ## Quality Gates - [ ] Cross-reference table built for all key metrics across all slides - [ ] Zero critical issues before client delivery - [ ] All disclaimers present in prescribed locations - [ ] All charts and tables carry source citations with dates - [ ] No orphan footnote markers or text - [ ] Brand and template compliance confirmed ## Related Skills - `workflow-fa-model-checking` — auditing the underlying model that feeds the deck - `workflow-fa-deck-refresh` — refreshing stale data in an existing deck for a new pitch context - `workflow-ib-pitch-deck` — pitch deck structure and content assembly - `workflow-deal-formatting-conventions` — number formatting standards - `workflow-confidentiality-disclaimers` — disclaimer language standards
Auf GitHub ansehen