メニュー
Quantum computing risk assessment framework for cryptocurrency investments - Monte-Carlo forecasting of quantum threat timelines, exposure analysis, and post-quantum migration pathways
デフォルトでは、最初にソースを確認する Prompt が選択されています。直接コマンドに切り替えるか、ローカルコピーをダウンロードすることもできます。
インストールを決める前に、SKILL.md と SkillsMP に表示されている付属ファイルをお読みください。
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
直接コマンドでは確認用 Prompt が省略されます。実行前にソースを確認してください。
npx skills add https://github.com/hiyenwong/ai_collection --skill quantum-crypto-investment-riskコマンドは1行のまま表示されます。コピー前に横へスクロールして全体を確認してください。
ローカルで確認しますか？SkillsMP が現在取得できるファイルをダウンロードできます。
Graph-native Python reimplementation of the Information Dynamics of Music (IDyOM) model that represents predictive memories as explicit graph objects for musical expectation modeling and network analysis.
Physics-aware end-to-end deep reinforcement learning methodology for quadcopter control with actuator dynamics modeling.
Reinforced Dreamer methodology for asymmetric reinforcement learning using latent guidance to improve world model representations and behaviors in model-based RL.
SOC 職業分類に基づく
SKILL.md を表示中
| name | quantum-crypto-investment-risk |
| category | finance |
| description | Quantum computing risk assessment framework for cryptocurrency investments - Monte-Carlo forecasting of quantum threat timelines, exposure analysis, and post-quantum migration pathways |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| created | 2026-06-27 |
| source_paper | arXiv:2606.14484 |
Framework for assessing quantum computing threats to cryptocurrency investments using the "Quantum Horizon" methodology from arXiv:2606.14484 (Gershteyn & Alber, 2026). Separates Shor's algorithm threats (signature breaking) from Grover's algorithm threats (mining), provides probabilistic timelines, and maps exposure/migration pathways.
Combine four factors into bimodal arrival distribution for cryptographically relevant quantum computer (CRQC):
Probabilities:
Bitcoin exposure:
Ethereum exposure:
| Threat Type | Probability | Impact | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Signature breakage (Shor) | High (60% by 2050) | Catastrophic | Post-quantum signature migration |
| Mining disruption (Grover) | Low (quadratic only) | Moderate | Already accounted for |
| Governance failure | Medium | Catastrophic | Protocol upgrade coordination |
For each crypto asset:
1. Identify signature algorithm (ECDSA, EdDSA, BLS, etc.)
2. Calculate % of coins at reusable/derived addresses
3. Estimate migration friction (protocol complexity, governance readiness)
4. Score: 0 (fully quantum-safe) to 100 (fully exposed, no migration path)
Risk discount factor = Σ P(CRQC at year t) × Impact(t)
Where:
- P(CRQC) = probability from Monte-Carlo forecast
- Impact(t) = function of migration readiness at time t
- Discount to present value
The binding constraint is governance, not technology. A timely post-quantum migration beats even an optimistic 2035 CRQC timeline. Assets with strong governance mechanisms for protocol upgrades are significantly more quantum-resilient.
Trigger words: quantum threat bitcoin, quantum ethereum, crypto quantum risk, post-quantum crypto, Shor algorithm crypto, quantum timeline, quantum-resistant blockchain, cryptocurrency quantum vulnerability
Use cases: