huifer/AdSense-Readiness-Benchmark

記録された最新のソース活動: 2026年5月5日 02:24

SkillsMP カタログ更新: 2026年10月29日 18:30

収集済み skills: 29

GitHub スター: 13
GitHub フォーク: 3

AI アシスタントでインストール

このプロンプトをコピーして、使用中の AI アシスタントに送ってください。

Follow https://skillsmp.com/skill-install/prompt.md to install Agent Skills from https://github.com/huifer/AdSense-Readiness-Benchmark.

リポジトリの README

README の元ファイル：README.md

README の元ファイルを読む

README 全文を表示

# ARB — Publisher Monetization Readiness Platform [![Policy-First](https://img.shields.io/badge/Policy--First-1f6feb)](#why-arb) [![Documentation-First](https://img.shields.io/badge/Documentation--First-0f766e)](#repository-structure) [![Bilingual](https://img.shields.io/badge/Bilingual-English%20%7C%20%E4%B8%AD%E6%96%87-8b5cf6)](./readme.zh.md) [![Primary-Focus](https://img.shields.io/badge/Primary%20Focus-AdSense%20Readiness-f59e0b)](#what-arb-does) [![Coverage](https://img.shields.io/badge/Coverage-Core%2079%20%7C%20Full%20105-374151)](#scoring-scope) [![skills.sh](https://skills.sh/b/huifer/AdSense-Readiness-Benchmark)](https://skills.sh/huifer/AdSense-Readiness-Benchmark) English | [中文说明](./readme.zh.md) ARB is a documentation-first audit framework for evaluating whether a website is ready for AdSense review and broader publisher monetization. It combines a benchmark model, a fixed scoring contract, and a 26-skill workflow that covers diagnosis, remediation, verification, monitoring, and recovery. The framework is built around 6 pillars, a fixed Core 79 review set for baseline checks, optional extension coverage up to the full 105-item benchmark, and hard veto rules so critical risks are never hidden by an average score. ## What ARB Does - Standardizes publisher-readiness reviews into evidence-backed checks. - Routes users through a full workflow from first audit to resubmission readiness. - Supports both fast triage and full-scope audits. - Produces structured outputs that are easy to reuse in reports, remediation plans, and follow-up reviews. - Extends beyond AdSense into multi-network readiness, benchmark comparison, and revenue-priority analysis when needed. ## Who This Is For - Site owners preparing for an initial AdSense application. - Operators trying to reduce rejection risk before resubmission. - Consultants or agencies auditing multiple publisher sites. - Teams that need a repeatable audit contract instead of ad hoc reviews. ## Why ARB ARB is designed around three constraints: 1. High-risk policy failures must stop the process early. 2. Audit outputs must be reproducible and evidence-based. 3. Different site types need different emphasis without changing the base scoring contract. That is why ARB uses: - 4 review gates. - 6 scoring pillars: CI, PC, TH, UX, TD, SI. - 3 score modes: Core 79, Core 79 + Profile, Full 105. - Veto precedence for critical failures. ## Repository Structure | Path | Purpose | |------|---------| | [ARB-benchmark.md](ARB-benchmark.md) | Source of truth for all item definitions, scoring rules, site-type profiles, and report expectations | | [skills/README.md](skills/README.md) | Full skill map and routing guide | | [skills/arb-full-audit/SKILL.md](skills/arb-full-audit/SKILL.md) | Single best starting point for most users | | [AGENTS.md](AGENTS.md) | Contributor and agent quality rules | | [skills/](skills/) | Individual audit, remediation, monitoring, and recovery skills | ## Core Concepts ### 1. Six Pillars | Code | Pillar | Focus | |------|--------|-------| | CI | Content Integrity | Originality, depth, structure, freshness | | PC | Policy Compliance | Prohibited content, disclosure, data rights | | TH | Technical Health | HTTPS, performance, crawlability, markup | | UX | User Experience | Navigation, readability, accessibility, ad safety | | TD | Trust & Disclosure | Legal pages, identity, business trust, editorial trust | | SI | Search Integrity | Spam prevention, linking hygiene, SEO legitimacy | ### 2. Scoring Scope | Mode | Use When | Coverage | |------|----------|----------| | `Core 79` | Fast baseline triage | Fixed baseline item set only | | `Core 79 + Profile` | Standard single-site audit | Core 79 plus one site-type profile and triggered items | | `Full 105` | Mixed-model or client-facing audit | Full benchmark coverage | ### 3. Veto Rules Readiness cannot pass if critical blockers fail. At minimum, treat the following as hard-stop conditions: - TH01: HTTPS not enabled site-wide - TD01: no privacy policy - Any unresolved fail in PC items - Any conflict on affiliate disclosure that cannot be cleared with evidence See [ARB-benchmark.md](ARB-benchmark.md) for the detailed veto contract. ## Full Usage Guide ### Prerequisites This repository is documentation-first. It does not ship a standalone CLI or bundled checker runtime. You use it by opening and following the benchmark and skill documents inside your editor or agent environment. Recommended setup: - A Markdown-capable editor such as VS Code - Access to the target site URL, source files, or both - A way to capture evidence such as screenshots, page links, crawl notes, or extracted findings ### Fastest Start From the repository root: ```bash open ./skills/arb-full-audit/SKILL.md open ./ARB-benchmark.md open ./skills/README.md ``` If you only want a lightweight triage instead of the full workflow: ```bash open ./skills/ads-readiness-assessment/SKILL.md ``` ### Standard Workflow Use this path for most audits: 1. Define the site URL, site type, and desired score mode. 2. Start with [skills/arb-full-audit/SKILL.md](skills/arb-full-audit/SKILL.md). 3. Run Gate 1 technical checks. 4. Run Gate 2 content, policy, spam, and copyright checks. 5. Run Gate 3 trust, UX, and disclosure checks. 6. Aggregate scores, apply veto logic, and record top fixes. 7. Use the matching remediation skills. 8. Finish with [skills/resubmission-readiness-check/SKILL.md](skills/resubmission-readiness-check/SKILL.md). ### Manual Gate-by-Gate Workflow Use this when you want more control over each phase. | Gate | Goal | Main Skills | |------|------|-------------| | Gate 1 | Technical baseline | `technical-audit` | | Gate 2 | Content, policy, and spam risk | `ads-readiness-assessment`, `content-audit`, `policy-risk-scanner`, `seo-spam-detection`, `copyright-ip-check` | | Gate 3 | Trust, UX, and disclosure | `ux-compliance-audit`, `trust-credibility-strategy`, `affiliate-link-compliance` | | Gate 4 | Remediation and final verification | `content-improvement-blueprint`, `technical-remediation-guide`, `ux-optimization-roadmap`, `policy-remediation-plan`, `resubmission-readiness-check` | ### Choose the Right Entry Point | Situation | Start Here | |-----------|------------| | First full audit | `arb-full-audit` | | Fast initial diagnosis | `ads-readiness-assessment` | | Technical blockers first | `technical-audit` | | Affiliate-heavy site | `affiliate-link-compliance` | | Rejection analysis | `rejection-root-cause-analysis` | | Post-approval monitoring | `active-compliance-monitor` | | Agency portfolio workflow | `agency-batch-auditor` | ### Inputs You Should Prepare For the best result, gather these before you start: | Input | Required | Notes | |------|----------|-------| | Site URL | Usually yes | Full URL including scheme | | Site type | Yes for scoring | blog, tool, affiliate, news, ecommerce, forum | | Score mode | Recommended | `Core 79`, `Core 79 + Profile`, or `Full 105` | | Traffic tier | Optional | Useful for benchmarking and revenue overlays | | Target networks | Optional | Use when evaluating beyond AdSense | | Evidence pack | Strongly recommended | Screenshots, URLs, examples, crawl observations | ### Supported Review Modes Most skills can be used in one of these ways: - URL mode: review the live site. - Source mode: inspect local project files. - Manual mode: follow the checklist and record findings yourself. See [skills/README.md](skills/README.md) for the skill-by-skill mode matrix. ## Outputs You Should Expect A complete audit should normally produce: - A declared score mode and evaluated scope - Pillar scores for CI, PC, TH, UX, TD, and SI - Veto status and any stop conditions - Evidence-backed findings for non-pass items - A prioritized fix list - Suggested next skills - Optional approval probability and network-gap overlays Recommended artifact set: | Artifact | Why It Matters | |----------|----------------| | Markdown audit report | Easy to review and share | | JSON scorecard | Easier aggregation and comparison | | Evidence notes | Supports reproducibility | | Remediation plan | Turns findings into action | ## Typical User Paths ### Website Owner 1. Start with `arb-full-audit`. 2. Fix the highest-priority blockers. 3. Run `resubmission-readiness-check`. 4. Submit only after all veto-adjacent issues are resolved. ### Consultant or Agency 1. Use `agency-batch-auditor` for multi-site intake. 2. Use `arb-full-audit` for deep reviews on selected sites. 3. Convert findings into client remediation tracks. 4. Re-run targeted checks before delivery or resubmission. ### Rejected Publisher 1. Start with `rejection-root-cause-analysis`. 2. Build the fix sequence with `recovery-action-plan`. 3. Run the remediation skills that match the failing pillars. 4. Finish with `resubmission-readiness-check`. ## Skill Groups ### Orchestration - `arb-full-audit` ### Diagnostics - `ads-readiness-assessment` - `content-audit` - `technical-audit` - `ux-compliance-audit` - `policy-risk-scanner` ### Remediation - `content-improvement-blueprint` - `technical-remediation-guide` - `ux-optimization-roadmap` - `policy-remediation-plan` - `trust-credibility-strategy` ### Cross-Phase Checks - `affiliate-link-compliance` - `copyright-ip-check` - `seo-spam-detection` ### Monitoring and Recovery - `active-compliance-monitor` - `health-check-automation` - `alert-rules-setup` - `rejection-root-cause-analysis` - `recovery-action-plan` - `appeal-strategy-builder` - `resubmission-readiness-check` ### Scale and Monetization Overlays - `ai-content-compliance` - `multi-network-readiness` - `revenue-potential-estimator` - `geo-localization-compliance` - `competitive-benchmark` - `agency-batch-auditor` ## Recommended Reading Order If you are new to the repository, read in this order: 1. [README.md](README.md) 2. [ARB-benchmark.md](ARB-benchmark.md) 3. [skills/README.md](skills/README.md) 4. [skills/arb-full-audit/SKILL.md](skills/arb-full-audit/SKILL.md) 5. The specific skill docs you plan to run ## Working Rules When using or extending ARB, keep these rules intact: - Do not invent evidence. - Do not suppress veto signals. - Do not change score scope without naming it explicitly. - Do not mark a site ready just because the weighted score is high. - Do keep findings reproducible and traceable. The detailed contributor contract lives in [AGENTS.md](AGENTS.md). ## FAQ ### Is this a software product or a documentation framework? It is a documentation-first framework. The repository defines the benchmark, scoring model, skill flow, and output expectations. ### Can I use it without evaluating all 105 items? Yes. Start with `Core 79` or `Core 79 + Profile` when you need a faster or more targeted review. ### Should I always start with `arb-full-audit`? For most users, yes. Use a specialist skill first only when you already know the problem area. ### Does a high score guarantee approval? No. ARB is a risk-reduction framework, not an official approval predictor. ## Related Documents - [ARB-benchmark.md](ARB-benchmark.md) - [skills/README.md](skills/README.md) - [skills/arb-full-audit/SKILL.md](skills/arb-full-audit/SKILL.md) - [readme.zh.md](readme.zh.md)

リポジトリの README を読み込んでいます…

このリポジトリの skills

市場調査アナリスト・マーケティングスペシャリストコンプライアンスオフィサーウェブ開発者プロジェクト管理専門家

12 件の職業カテゴリ · 100% 分類済み