verification

name	verification
description	Substantiates a completion or readiness claim with freshly gathered evidence.
when_to_use	Use this implementation mechanic to substantiate a completion or readiness claim only when explicitly invoked by name or called by an active Gambit workflow owner; do not select it implicitly as a peer workflow.

Verification Before Completion

Freedom: LOW — run the command, read the output, then claim. No exceptions.

Overview

Claiming work is complete without verification is dishonesty, not efficiency.

Core principle: Evidence before claims, always. Be adversarial about proof and closed about scope.

Quick Reference

Claim	Verification Required	Not Sufficient
Tests pass	Run the complete command for the declared validation tier, see 0 failures	Previous run, lower-tier evidence
Build succeeds	Run build, see exit 0	Linter passing
Bug fixed	Test original symptom, passes	Code changed
Linter clean	Linter output: 0 errors	Partial check, extrapolation
Regression test works	Red-green cycle verified	Test passes once
Task complete	Check ALL success criteria individually	"Implemented the feature"
Review closure	Open ledger IDs + original criteria/gates	A fresh audit or new criteria

| All tasks done | TaskList shows all completed | "All tasks done" |

| Wave ready for checkpoint | Every worker result and criterion is verified and readiness is reported to the owning workflow | Individual worker reports alone | | All waves done | SessionPlanRead shows every wave step completed | "All work is done" |

| Agent completed | VCS diff shows changes | Agent reports "success" |

The Iron Law

NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE

If you haven't run the verification command in THIS message, you cannot claim it passes.

• Previous runs don't count (you changed code since then)
• Agent reports don't count (verify independently)
• Mental confidence doesn't count (run it)

Verification is non-generative. Freeze the claims before checking them: approved requirements, recorded success criteria, open review-ledger IDs, and named project gates. Try hard to disprove those claims. Do not invent additional requirements, style work, process audits, or review findings while verifying. Report newly noticed observations separately as non-blocking; route any requested scope expansion back to the owning workflow.

Red Flags — STOP

If you catch yourself doing ANY of the following, you are about to claim completion without evidence. STOP and run verification before the next word you say or tool you call.

Language signals:

• Using hedging words: "should", "probably", "seems to", "I think", "ought to"
• Satisfaction expressions BEFORE evidence: "Great!", "Perfect!", "Done!", "All set!", "That does it!", "Ready to commit."
• Any sentence that implies success without naming the verification command you ran

State signals:

• About to commit / push / open a PR / mark a task completed — and you haven't run the command in THIS message
• Trusting a subagent's success report without reading the VCS diff
• Relying on a partial check (ran one file's tests, about to claim "tests pass")
• Previous verification is stale — you changed code since the last run

Emotional / fatigue signals (these are the ones that bypass rational guards):

• "I'm tired" / end-of-day exhaustion — fatigue pushes you toward claiming done so you can stop
• "Just this once" / "just one exception" — no such thing
• "I'm confident it works" — confidence without evidence is the exact failure mode this skill exists to prevent
• Eagerness to wrap up the conversation or move to the next task

All of these mean: STOP. Run the verification command fresh. Read the output. THEN claim the result.

When to Use

ALWAYS before:

• Any success/completion claim
• Any expression of satisfaction ("Great!", "Perfect!", "Done!")
• Committing, PR creation, task completion
• Moving to next task

Don't use for: Deciding what to build (gambit:brainstorming), how to build it (gambit:executing-plans)

The Process

1. Identify What Proves the Claim

Before making any completion claim, ask: "What command proves this?"

Write down the complete claim set first. A failed declared claim blocks completion; an observation outside that set does not silently become a claim.

Take the claim's tier from the approved Validation Strategy:

• A focused worker command proves the worker-owned behavior and its TDD claim.
• A wave/component gate proves the integrated wave at the component boundary.
• release acceptance proves the final fresh system-level claim and consumes the declared acceptance budget.

Never promote a worker or wave claim to release acceptance. Verification runs the complete command for the claim's declared tier; it does not spend a more expensive tier merely because that command is more comprehensive.

Claim Type	Verification
Tests pass	Project's test command (go test ./..., npm test, etc.)
Build succeeds	Project's build command
Linter clean	Project's lint command
Task complete	Each success criterion verified individually

| Epic complete | TaskList + each epic criterion verified |

| Epic complete | Every SessionPlanRead wave step completed + each approved-contract criterion verified |

2. Run the Command (Fresh)

Execute the COMPLETE command for the declared validation tier. Not a partial command within that tier. Not a cached result.

For verbose output: use the contracted test-runner.

Resolve the test-runner role through contracts/models.md to its rung before dispatch. A model rung uses the general-purpose dispatch below with model: set to the rung's alias; an agent rung uses the rung's agent and passes no model: at all. The complete command and the repository/worktree root are the same on either shape.

Agent
  subagent_type: "general-purpose"          # model rung; an agent rung uses the rung's agent
  model: "<test-runner rung alias — contracts/models.md>"   # omit entirely on an agent rung
  description: "Run verification"
  prompt: "Run: [command]. Report pass/fail counts, exit code, and any failures. Make no edits."

Dispatch the native test-runner class:

Agent
  subagent_type: "general-purpose"
  model: "<test-runner tier — see contracts/models.md>"
  description: "Run verification"
  prompt: "Run: [command]. Report pass/fail counts, exit code, and any failures. Make no edits."

For quick commands: Run directly with Bash.

Critical: If you changed code since the last run, previous results are STALE. Run again.

3. Read the Output Completely

Don't:

• Skim for "PASS"
• Assume success from partial output
• Trust cached results

Do:

• Read complete output
• Count actual pass/fail numbers
• Check exit code

4. State Claim WITH Evidence

If verification FAILS: State actual status with evidence.

Tests: 33 passed, 1 failed.
Failure: test_login_with_expired_token still fails.
The fix didn't handle expired tokens.
Investigating...

If verification PASSES: State claim WITH evidence.

Tests pass. [Ran: go test ./..., Output: 34/34 passed, exit 0]
Ready to commit.

5. Task Completion: Verify Each Criterion

Before marking any task complete:

1. TaskGet — re-read success criteria
2. Verify EACH criterion with its own command/check
3. Report status of each individually
4. ONLY THEN mark complete

TaskGet taskId: "current-task-id"

→ Success criteria from task:
  1. POST /auth/login returns valid JWT
  2. Invalid password returns 401
  3. All tests pass

→ Verification:
  1. Ran: curl -X POST localhost:8080/auth/login -d '...'
     Output: {"token": "eyJ..."} — VERIFIED
  2. Ran: curl with wrong password
     Output: 401 {"error": "Invalid credentials"} — VERIFIED
  3. Ran: go test ./...
     Output: 34/34 passed, exit 0 — VERIFIED

→ All criteria verified.

TaskUpdate taskId: "current-task-id" status: "completed"

For epic completion: Run TaskList first, confirm ALL subtasks show completed, then verify epic-level criteria the same way.

5. Wave Completion: Verify Every Worker Criterion

Before reporting the current wave ready for its durable checkpoint:

1. Use SessionContextRead to reread the complete worker briefs for the current wave and the approved epic contract
2. Verify EACH worker criterion with its own command/check
3. Confirm individual worker completion from native subagent results and the root checkpoint, not plan records
4. Report every criterion's status
5. Report that the wave is ready for its durable checkpoint

The owning execution workflow performs the completion mutation only after it commits the verified wave and retains the full checkpoint plus any next-wave briefs in the root transcript. Verification never marks native wave state completed itself.

SessionContextRead → complete current-wave worker briefs

→ Success criteria from a worker brief:
  1. POST /auth/login returns valid JWT
  2. Invalid password returns 401
  3. All tests pass

→ Verification:
  1. Ran: curl -X POST localhost:8080/auth/login -d '...'
     Output: {"token": "eyJ..."} — VERIFIED
  2. Ran: curl with wrong password
     Output: 401 {"error": "Invalid credentials"} — VERIFIED
  3. Ran: go test ./...
     Output: 34/34 passed, exit 0 — VERIFIED

→ All worker criteria verified. Wave is ready for the owning execution workflow's durable checkpoint.

For epic completion: Run SessionPlanRead first and confirm every wave step is completed. Then use SessionContextRead to reread the approved epic contract and verify every epic-level criterion. Worker completion evidence comes from checkpoints and native subagent results.

---

Examples

See REFERENCE.md for detailed good/bad examples including:

• Claiming success without verification vs. verification before claim
• Closing task without criterion verification vs. verifying each criterion
• Trusting agent reports vs. independent verification
• Stale verification after code changes

---

Integration

This skill is called by:

• gambit:test-driven-development (verify tests pass/fail)
• gambit:executing-plans (verify task success criteria)
• gambit:debugging (confirm the failing test reproduces the bug; verify a fast-path fix is green)
• ALL skills before completion claims

This skill calls:

• the contracted test-runner role (run + report, no source edits — rung resolved through contracts/models.md) for running verbose commands

• the configured or native test-runner executor (run + report, no source edits — contracts/executors.md and contracts/models.md) for running verbose commands

Called by:

• Any skill before marking work complete

Workflow:

About to claim completion
    ↓
Step 1: What command proves this?
    ↓
Step 2: Run it (fresh)
    ↓
Step 3: Read output completely
    ↓
Step 4: State claim WITH evidence
    ↓
Step 5: For tasks, verify EACH criterion
    ↓
Evidence confirms → Make claim