Skip to main content

code-review

Perform code reviews following Sentry engineering practices. Use when reviewing pull requests, examining code changes, or providing feedback on code quality. Covers security, performance, testing, and design review.

ソース情報

リポジトリ
lightconsen/extensions
ソースの最終更新活動
2026年9月8日 12:34
検出された SKILL.md の言語
英語
スター
0
フォーク
0

インストール方法

デフォルトでは、最初にソースを確認する Prompt が選択されています。直接コマンドに切り替えるか、ローカルコピーをダウンロードすることもできます。

ソースファイルを確認

インストールを決める前に、SKILL.md と SkillsMP に表示されている付属ファイルをお読みください。

ファイルエクスプローラー
4 ファイル

SKILL.md を表示中

SKILL.md
ソースの指示 · 読み取り専用プレビュー
name
code-review
description
Perform code reviews following Sentry engineering practices. Use when reviewing pull requests, examining code changes, or providing feedback on code quality. Covers security, performance, testing, and design review.
# Sentry Code Review Follow these guidelines when reviewing code for Sentry projects. ## Review Checklist ### Identifying Problems Look for these issues in code changes: - **Runtime errors**: Potential exceptions, null pointer issues, out-of-bounds access - **Performance**: Unbounded O(n²) operations, N+1 queries, unnecessary allocations - **Side effects**: Unintended behavioral changes affecting other components - **Backwards compatibility**: Breaking API changes without migration path - **ORM queries**: Complex Django ORM with unexpected query performance - **Security vulnerabilities**: Injection, XSS, access control gaps, secrets exposure ### Design Assessment - Do component interactions make logical sense? - Does the change align with existing project architecture? - Are there conflicts with current requirements or goals? ### Test Coverage Every PR should have appropriate test coverage: - Functional tests for business logic - Integration tests for component interactions - End-to-end tests for critical user paths Verify tests cover actual requirements and edge cases. Avoid excessive branching or looping in test code. ### Long-Term Impact Flag for senior engineer review when changes involve: - Database schema modifications - API contract changes - New framework or library adoption - Performance-critical code paths - Security-sensitive functionality ## Feedback Guidelines ### Tone - Be polite and empathetic - Provide actionable suggestions, not vague criticism - Phrase as questions when uncertain: "Have you considered...?" ### Approval - Approve when only minor issues remain - Don't block PRs for stylistic preferences - Remember: the goal is risk reduction, not perfect code ## Common Patterns to Flag ### Python/Django ```python # Bad: N+1 query for user in users: print(user.profile.name) # Separate query per user # Good: Prefetch related users = User.objects.prefetch_related('profile') ``` ### TypeScript/React ```typescript // Bad: Missing dependency in useEffect useEffect(() => { fetchData(userId); }, []); // userId not in deps // Good: Include all dependencies useEffect(() => { fetchData(userId); }, [userId]); ``` ### Security ```python # Bad: SQL injection risk cursor.execute(f"SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = {user_id}") # Good: Parameterized query cursor.execute("SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = %s", [user_id]) ``` ## References - [Sentry Code Review Guidelines](https://develop.sentry.dev/engineering-practices/code-review/)
GitHubで見る