Skip to main content

code-review

Perform code reviews following Sentry engineering practices. Use when reviewing pull requests, examining code changes, or providing feedback on code quality. Covers security, performance, testing, and design review.

설치로 이동

소스 정보

저장소
lightconsen/extensions
최근 소스 활동
2026년 9월 8일 12:34
감지된 SKILL.md 언어
영어
스타
0
포크
0

설치 방법

기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.

소스 파일 검토

설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.

파일 탐색기
4 개 파일

SKILL.md 표시 중

SKILL.md
소스 지침 · 읽기 전용 미리보기
name
code-review
description
Perform code reviews following Sentry engineering practices. Use when reviewing pull requests, examining code changes, or providing feedback on code quality. Covers security, performance, testing, and design review.
# Sentry Code Review Follow these guidelines when reviewing code for Sentry projects. ## Review Checklist ### Identifying Problems Look for these issues in code changes: - **Runtime errors**: Potential exceptions, null pointer issues, out-of-bounds access - **Performance**: Unbounded O(n²) operations, N+1 queries, unnecessary allocations - **Side effects**: Unintended behavioral changes affecting other components - **Backwards compatibility**: Breaking API changes without migration path - **ORM queries**: Complex Django ORM with unexpected query performance - **Security vulnerabilities**: Injection, XSS, access control gaps, secrets exposure ### Design Assessment - Do component interactions make logical sense? - Does the change align with existing project architecture? - Are there conflicts with current requirements or goals? ### Test Coverage Every PR should have appropriate test coverage: - Functional tests for business logic - Integration tests for component interactions - End-to-end tests for critical user paths Verify tests cover actual requirements and edge cases. Avoid excessive branching or looping in test code. ### Long-Term Impact Flag for senior engineer review when changes involve: - Database schema modifications - API contract changes - New framework or library adoption - Performance-critical code paths - Security-sensitive functionality ## Feedback Guidelines ### Tone - Be polite and empathetic - Provide actionable suggestions, not vague criticism - Phrase as questions when uncertain: "Have you considered...?" ### Approval - Approve when only minor issues remain - Don't block PRs for stylistic preferences - Remember: the goal is risk reduction, not perfect code ## Common Patterns to Flag ### Python/Django ```python # Bad: N+1 query for user in users: print(user.profile.name) # Separate query per user # Good: Prefetch related users = User.objects.prefetch_related('profile') ``` ### TypeScript/React ```typescript // Bad: Missing dependency in useEffect useEffect(() => { fetchData(userId); }, []); // userId not in deps // Good: Include all dependencies useEffect(() => { fetchData(userId); }, [userId]); ``` ### Security ```python # Bad: SQL injection risk cursor.execute(f"SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = {user_id}") # Good: Parameterized query cursor.execute("SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = %s", [user_id]) ``` ## References - [Sentry Code Review Guidelines](https://develop.sentry.dev/engineering-practices/code-review/)
GitHub에서 보기