Skip to main content

pr-writer

Create or refresh reviewer-facing PR titles and descriptions. Use when opening a PR, updating its title or body, or preparing branch changes for review.

インストールへ移動

ソース情報

リポジトリ
lightconsen/extensions
ソースの最終更新活動
2026年9月8日 12:34
検出された SKILL.md の言語
英語
スター
0
フォーク
0

インストール方法

デフォルトでは、最初にソースを確認する Prompt が選択されています。直接コマンドに切り替えるか、ローカルコピーをダウンロードすることもできます。

ソースファイルを確認

インストールを決める前に、SKILL.md と SkillsMP に表示されている付属ファイルをお読みください。

ファイルエクスプローラー
8 ファイル

SKILL.md を表示中

SKILL.md
ソースの指示 · 読み取り専用プレビュー
name
pr-writer
description
Create or refresh reviewer-facing PR titles and descriptions. Use when opening a PR, updating its title or body, or preparing branch changes for review.
# PR Writer Write the PR body as a cover note for reviewers, not a changelog, template, validation log, or file-by-file summary. ## Inspect the Change Requires authenticated `gh`. Inspect the current branch, working tree, PR, base branch, commits, and full diff: ```bash git branch --show-current git status --porcelain gh pr view --json number,title,body,url,baseRefName,headRefName gh repo view --json defaultBranchRef ``` If `gh pr view` reports that no PR exists, continue with first-time PR creation. For an existing PR, use its `baseRefName`; otherwise use the repository default branch. Set `BASE`, then inspect: ```bash git log "$BASE"..HEAD --oneline git diff "$BASE"...HEAD ``` If on `main` or `master`, create a feature branch first. Ensure intended changes are committed and review the whole branch diff, not only the latest commit or existing PR text. ## Core Rules - Describe concrete changed behavior, affected surfaces, and reviewer impact before implementation detail. - Explain motivation, risk, tradeoffs, migration, or review focus only when useful. - Use the smallest structure that makes the change easier to review. - Replace internal prompt or process terminology with specific behavior. - When refreshing a PR, rewrite around the current full diff without narrating review history. ## Titles Use `<type>(<scope>): <subject>` or `<type>: <subject>`. Allowed types: `feat`, `fix`, `ref`, `perf`, `docs`, `test`, `build`, `ci`, `chore`, `style`, `meta`, `license`, and `revert`. - Describe the dominant full-branch change with the narrowest accurate type and scope. - Use `!` only when the change breaks an external contract, and explain the affected surface in the body. - Avoid vague subjects such as `update`, `cleanup`, `misc`, `fix stuff`, or `address feedback`. Do not add a trailing period. - Keep an existing title only when it still describes the whole diff. ## Body Shape Choose the minimum useful shape: | Change | Include | |--------|---------| | Small or obvious | One concise paragraph without headings. | | Feature, bug fix, or refactor | Changed behavior and effect; add root cause, unchanged behavior, or non-obvious approach when relevant. | | Contract or breaking change | Affected API, schema, payload, config, permission, storage, or CLI surface; include compatibility and migration guidance. | | Operational, visual, or workflow change | User/operator effect, measured impact, failure modes, or flow when useful. | | Broad, generated, or cross-cutting change | Organizing principle, why the breadth is necessary, and where review should start. | Default: ```markdown <What changed and what effect it has.> <Why the approach, risk, migration, or review focus matters, if not obvious.> ``` For review-feedback updates, describe the resulting PR as a whole rather than the sequence of revisions. ## Reviewer Aids Use an aid only when it reduces reviewer reconstruction work: - A compact before/after or interface example for changed contracts. - A small Mermaid diagram for async flows or state transitions. - A screenshot or recording note when visual evidence exists. - A rollout, compatibility, risk, or review-order note when reviewers or adopters need it. Introduce an artifact with one sentence explaining what reviewers should notice. Omit it when prose is clearer. ## Boundaries - Do not add default `Summary`, `Changes`, or `Test Plan` sections. - Omit routine validation unless it changes risk assessment or explains meaningful regression coverage. For docs, skills, copy, or config changes, omit it by default. - Do not paste commands, CI logs, validation dumps, commit logs, placeholders, or exhaustive file lists. - Never include customer or organization names, user emails, support ticket contents, secrets, or PII. - Use issue references only when verified from user input, branch names, commits, PR discussion, or tracker output. `Fixes <issue>` closes; `Refs <issue>` only links. ## Create or Update Create new PRs as drafts. Write the body to a temporary Markdown file, then run: ```bash gh pr create --draft --title '<title>' --body-file /tmp/pr-body.md ``` Update existing PRs with `gh api`: ```bash gh api -X PATCH repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/PR_NUMBER \ -f title='<title>' \ -F body=@/tmp/pr-body.md ``` Refresh the title and body when follow-up commits materially change scope, approach, breaking behavior, risk, migration, or review expectations. Skip typo-only, formatting-only, and rename-only follow-ups. ## Examples Small change: ```markdown The AI Customizations section now starts collapsed so it does not consume sidebar space before users need it. Expanding it preserves the existing saved preference behavior. ``` Breaking contract: ````markdown Run logs now emit chunk-level records instead of one skill-level record. Consumers that read top-level `findings` must iterate over `chunk.findings` for each record. Before: ```json {"skill": "security-review", "findings": [...]} ``` After: ```json {"schemaVersion": 1, "chunk": {"index": 1, "findings": [...]}} ``` ````
GitHubで見る