Skip to main content

pr-writer

Create or refresh reviewer-facing PR titles and descriptions. Use when opening a PR, updating its title or body, or preparing branch changes for review.

Zur Installation springen

Quellinformationen

Repository
lightconsen/extensions
Letzte Quellaktivität
8. September 2026 um 12:34
Erkannte Sprache von SKILL.md
Englisch
Sterne
0
Forks
0

Installationsoptionen

Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.

Quelldateien prüfen

Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.

Datei-Explorer
8 Dateien

SKILL.md wird angezeigt

SKILL.md
Quellanweisungen · Schreibgeschützte Vorschau
name
pr-writer
description
Create or refresh reviewer-facing PR titles and descriptions. Use when opening a PR, updating its title or body, or preparing branch changes for review.
# PR Writer Write the PR body as a cover note for reviewers, not a changelog, template, validation log, or file-by-file summary. ## Inspect the Change Requires authenticated `gh`. Inspect the current branch, working tree, PR, base branch, commits, and full diff: ```bash git branch --show-current git status --porcelain gh pr view --json number,title,body,url,baseRefName,headRefName gh repo view --json defaultBranchRef ``` If `gh pr view` reports that no PR exists, continue with first-time PR creation. For an existing PR, use its `baseRefName`; otherwise use the repository default branch. Set `BASE`, then inspect: ```bash git log "$BASE"..HEAD --oneline git diff "$BASE"...HEAD ``` If on `main` or `master`, create a feature branch first. Ensure intended changes are committed and review the whole branch diff, not only the latest commit or existing PR text. ## Core Rules - Describe concrete changed behavior, affected surfaces, and reviewer impact before implementation detail. - Explain motivation, risk, tradeoffs, migration, or review focus only when useful. - Use the smallest structure that makes the change easier to review. - Replace internal prompt or process terminology with specific behavior. - When refreshing a PR, rewrite around the current full diff without narrating review history. ## Titles Use `<type>(<scope>): <subject>` or `<type>: <subject>`. Allowed types: `feat`, `fix`, `ref`, `perf`, `docs`, `test`, `build`, `ci`, `chore`, `style`, `meta`, `license`, and `revert`. - Describe the dominant full-branch change with the narrowest accurate type and scope. - Use `!` only when the change breaks an external contract, and explain the affected surface in the body. - Avoid vague subjects such as `update`, `cleanup`, `misc`, `fix stuff`, or `address feedback`. Do not add a trailing period. - Keep an existing title only when it still describes the whole diff. ## Body Shape Choose the minimum useful shape: | Change | Include | |--------|---------| | Small or obvious | One concise paragraph without headings. | | Feature, bug fix, or refactor | Changed behavior and effect; add root cause, unchanged behavior, or non-obvious approach when relevant. | | Contract or breaking change | Affected API, schema, payload, config, permission, storage, or CLI surface; include compatibility and migration guidance. | | Operational, visual, or workflow change | User/operator effect, measured impact, failure modes, or flow when useful. | | Broad, generated, or cross-cutting change | Organizing principle, why the breadth is necessary, and where review should start. | Default: ```markdown <What changed and what effect it has.> <Why the approach, risk, migration, or review focus matters, if not obvious.> ``` For review-feedback updates, describe the resulting PR as a whole rather than the sequence of revisions. ## Reviewer Aids Use an aid only when it reduces reviewer reconstruction work: - A compact before/after or interface example for changed contracts. - A small Mermaid diagram for async flows or state transitions. - A screenshot or recording note when visual evidence exists. - A rollout, compatibility, risk, or review-order note when reviewers or adopters need it. Introduce an artifact with one sentence explaining what reviewers should notice. Omit it when prose is clearer. ## Boundaries - Do not add default `Summary`, `Changes`, or `Test Plan` sections. - Omit routine validation unless it changes risk assessment or explains meaningful regression coverage. For docs, skills, copy, or config changes, omit it by default. - Do not paste commands, CI logs, validation dumps, commit logs, placeholders, or exhaustive file lists. - Never include customer or organization names, user emails, support ticket contents, secrets, or PII. - Use issue references only when verified from user input, branch names, commits, PR discussion, or tracker output. `Fixes <issue>` closes; `Refs <issue>` only links. ## Create or Update Create new PRs as drafts. Write the body to a temporary Markdown file, then run: ```bash gh pr create --draft --title '<title>' --body-file /tmp/pr-body.md ``` Update existing PRs with `gh api`: ```bash gh api -X PATCH repos/{owner}/{repo}/pulls/PR_NUMBER \ -f title='<title>' \ -F body=@/tmp/pr-body.md ``` Refresh the title and body when follow-up commits materially change scope, approach, breaking behavior, risk, migration, or review expectations. Skip typo-only, formatting-only, and rename-only follow-ups. ## Examples Small change: ```markdown The AI Customizations section now starts collapsed so it does not consume sidebar space before users need it. Expanding it preserves the existing saved preference behavior. ``` Breaking contract: ````markdown Run logs now emit chunk-level records instead of one skill-level record. Consumers that read top-level `findings` must iterate over `chunk.findings` for each record. Before: ```json {"skill": "security-review", "findings": [...]} ``` After: ```json {"schemaVersion": 1, "chunk": {"index": 1, "findings": [...]}} ``` ````
Auf GitHub ansehen