メニュー
Six Thinking Hats parallel thinking—explore from six perspectives (facts, feelings, caution, benefits, creativity, process). Use for group decisions or ensuring all angles are considered.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Strunk & White composition review using the 11 principles from "Elements of Style" Chapter II. Use when analyzing structure, improving flow, or tightening prose.
Strunk & White style review using the 21 reminders from "Elements of Style" Chapter V. Use when editing prose, reviewing drafts, or improving writing clarity and tone.
Strunk & White grammar review using the 11 elementary rules from "Elements of Style" Chapter I. Use when checking mechanics, punctuation, and grammatical correctness.
Five Whys root cause analysis. Iteratively asks "why" to drill past symptoms to underlying causes. Use for debugging, investigating failures, or understanding why something went wrong.
After-Action Review—structured debrief asking what was expected, what happened, why the difference, and what next. Use after projects, launches, presentations, or any significant event.
Cynefin sense-making framework categorizing problems as Simple, Complicated, Complex, Chaotic, or Confused to select the right approach. Use when unsure how to tackle a problem.
| name | sixhats |
| description | Six Thinking Hats parallel thinking—explore from six perspectives (facts, feelings, caution, benefits, creativity, process). Use for group decisions or ensuring all angles are considered. |
| user-invocable | true |
Explore a topic from all six perspectives—facts, feelings, caution, benefits, creativity, and process.
Work through each hat sequentially, giving full attention to one perspective before moving to the next. This is parallel thinking, not debate.
Topic: [What we're exploring]
What do we know? What data do we have?
Known Facts
Information Gaps
How do we feel about this? What does gut instinct say?
Emotional Reactions
Intuitions
No justification needed—this hat is about feelings, not reasons.
What could go wrong? What are the risks and problems?
Risks
| Risk | Likelihood | Severity |
|---|---|---|
| [risk] | High/Med/Low | High/Med/Low |
Why It Might Fail
What's good about this? What value does it offer?
Benefits
| Benefit | Who Benefits | Magnitude |
|---|---|---|
| [benefit] | [stakeholder] | High/Med/Low |
Best Case Scenario If everything goes well: [description]
What else is possible? What new ideas emerge?
Alternative Approaches
Wild Ideas (don't filter)
What have we learned? What should we do next?
Summary of Perspectives
| Hat | Key Insight |
|---|---|
| White | [main data point] |
| Red | [main feeling] |
| Black | [main concern] |
| Yellow | [main benefit] |
| Green | [best alternative] |
Recommended Next Steps
Decision/Direction Based on all six perspectives:
[Recommendation or decision]
$ARGUMENTS
