Master product strategy, market analysis, competitive positioning, and long-term product vision. Define business models and craft go-to-market strategies that drive success.
sasmp_version
1.3.0
bonded_agent
01-strategy-vision
bond_type
PRIMARY_BOND
parameters
[{"name":"market_context","type":"string","required":true,"description":"Market veya ürün hakkında context"},{"name":"analysis_type","type":"string","enum":["tam_sam_som","competitive","positioning","business_model"]}]
Master the art of strategic product thinking. Define winning market positions, identify opportunities, and create compelling visions that guide your entire organization.
Part 1: Market Analysis Framework
Market Definition
TAM (Total Addressable Market)
Total revenue opportunity in your market
Definition: All potential customers who need your solution
Example: B2B SaaS for small business = 5M SMBs × $5K = $25B TAM
SAM (Serviceable Available Market)
Market you can realistically capture
Definition: Segments you can reach with your go-to-market
Usually 5-20% of TAM
More useful for planning
SOM (Serviceable Obtainable Market)
Realistic market share in first 3-5 years
Definition: What you can actually win with realistic execution
Usually 1-5% of SAM
Use for revenue projections
Competitive Landscape
Direct Competitors
Products serving same customer with same use case
Examples: Slack vs Teams, Figma vs Adobe XD
Indirect Competitors
Solutions to same problem, different approach
Examples: Slack vs email, Google Forms vs Typeform
Alternative Solutions
Build in-house, spreadsheets, manual processes
Often biggest competitor for new categories
Analyze Each:
Product capabilities matrix
Pricing and positioning
Target customer segment
Go-to-market approach
Strengths and weaknesses
Market share and growth
Recent funding/momentum
Market Trends & Timing
Questions to Answer:
Is the market growing or shrinking?
What's driving growth?
Are there macroeconomic tailwinds?
What regulatory changes are coming?
Is technology making solutions possible now?
Are buyers ready to adopt?
Market Readiness
Have customers already tried solutions?
Are there early adopters?
Is there pent-up demand?
Are budget allocations available?
Part 2: Positioning Strategy
Value Proposition
Define what you offer that's different and better:
Template:
For [target customer]
Who [customer need/problem]
The [product name]
Is [product category]
That [key benefit]
Unlike [alternative]
Our product [unique differentiator]
Example (Slack):
For teams that need communication
Who struggle with fragmented tools (email, Skype, etc)
Slack is a messaging platform
That brings all communication into one place
Unlike email (which is async and scattered)
Our product is focused on searchable history and integrations
Positioning Pillars
3-5 core pillars that define your position:
Speed - Faster than alternatives
Ease of Use - Simpler than competitors
Integration - Connects to tools they already use
Security - Enterprise-grade security
Cost - Better ROI than alternatives
Rate yourself vs competitors on each pillar.
Target Customer Profile
Ideal Customer (ICP):
Company size (employees, revenue)
Industry vertical
Job titles of decision makers
Annual spend budget
Current tech stack
Growth stage (startup, growth, enterprise)
Why they'll buy:
Main pain point you solve
Secondary pain points
How success is measured
What failure looks like
Part 3: Business Model Design
Revenue Model Options
SaaS (Software as a Service)
Monthly/annual recurring revenue
Per user, per seat, per feature tier
High gross margin (70-80%)
Pros: Predictable, high LTV
Cons: Long sales cycle
Freemium
Free tier with limited features
Paid upgrades for power users
Good for user acquisition
Challenge: Converting free to paid
One-Time Purchase
Perpetual license
Lower LTV than SaaS
Better for enterprise deals
Outdated for most categories
Usage-Based
Pay for what you use (GB, API calls, etc)
Good for variable workloads
Challenge: Revenue unpredictability
Marketplace/Commission
Take percentage of transactions
Examples: Stripe, Uber, Airbnb
High volume, lower margins
Network effects critical
Hybrid Models
Combine multiple (e.g., SaaS base + usage overage)
More complex but often optimal
Pricing Strategy
Value-Based Pricing
Price based on value delivered, not cost
Most profitable approach
Requires understanding ROI for customer
Tiered Pricing
Starter, Professional, Enterprise
Good for catering to different segments
Prevent feature parity issues
Per-Seat Pricing
Charge per user
Easy to understand
Can limit adoption (too expensive for large teams)
"[Product] helps [target customer] [solve problem/achieve goal]. Unlike [alternative], we [unique differentiator], which results in [customer benefit]. We're focused on [market segment] and building [key capability]."
