ワンクリックでManusで任意のスキルを実行

food-function

スター17

フォーク1

更新日2026年7月11日 11:01

Shared author-guideline skill for Royal Society of Chemistry food journals: Food & Function and Sustainable Food Technology. Use to format or check a manuscript for an RSC food journal — article types, structure, RSC superscript-numbered references, and figure specs. Triggers: submit to Food & Function, Sustainable Food Technology guidelines, RSC food formatting. Also fires when the user wants to publish on/in this journal, format a manuscript for it, or match its reference/citation style.

インストール

Codex または Claude でインストールこの Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。

Manusで実行

ソース

PangenomeAI

PangenomeAI/academic-skills-food-nutrition

GitHub リポジトリを開く Creator のリポジトリを見る

ダウンロード

Manusで実行

RSC Food Journals — Shared Author Guideline Skill

Publisher: Royal Society of Chemistry · Verified: 2026-07 · Sources: Food & Function, Sustainable Food Technology. Use the RSC article template.

Applies to

Journal	Abbrev	Scope
Food & Function	FOOD FUNCT	Physical/biological function of food, nutrition, health effects
Sustainable Food Technology	SUSTAIN FOOD TECHNOL	Sustainable food processing/technology (open access)

Article types

Full papers (Research Articles), Communications (urgent, high-impact, short), Reviews, and Perspectives. Food & Function expects a clear link to biological/physiological function, not composition alone.

Manuscript structure

Title → Author list & affiliations → Abstract → Introduction → Results and discussion → Experimental (methods placed after results, RSC convention) → Conclusions → Conflicts of interest → Acknowledgements → References. A table-of-contents (TOC) graphic + one-sentence TOC entry is required.

Abstract: concise, unstructured (~150–200 words).
Experimental section: after Results & Discussion (RSC style).
Conflicts of interest statement: mandatory (state "There are no conflicts to declare" if none).

Reference style

RSC style: superscript numbers in order of citation; numbered reference list. Journal names abbreviated, year bold, volume italic, first page only.

Example:

1 A. B. Author and C. D. Author, Food Funct., 2023, 14, 1234.

Figures & tables

Figures ≥300 dpi (≥600 for line art); fit single (~8.3 cm) or double (~17.1 cm) column; RGB online; editable tables; cite in order. TOC graphic ~8 × 4 cm.

Submission checklist

TOC graphic + one-sentence TOC text · [ ] Abstract ~150–200 words
Experimental after Results & Discussion · [ ] RSC superscript-numbered references
Conflicts of interest statement · [ ] Data availability (RSC requirement)
Figures ≥300 dpi · [ ] Cover letter (significance / function link)

Formatting constraints

publisher: RSC
reference_style: rsc-superscript-numbered
abstract_words: 200
toc_graphic: required
methods_section: after-results   # "Experimental"
conflicts_statement: required
figure_dpi: {halftone: 300, line_art: 600}
column_widths_cm: [8.3, 17.1]

このリポジトリの他の Skills

同じリポジトリ

food-deep-research

PangenomeAI/academic-skills-food-nutrition

General-purpose deep research that produces a fully written, source-validated literature review on any question: scope it, design the method, discover and screen sources by journal ranking, validate every source, extract and verify evidence, synthesize, stress-test, then write and format the review (APA 7.0 by default, or a target journal's style) and polish it through an editorial + integrity review loop. Use standalone for a deep dive or literature review, or as the deep-dive engine called by food-research. Runs a 12-subagent team with iterate-to-saturation and compile↔review loops. Triggers: deep research, research this in depth, write a literature review, investigate thoroughly, comprehensive review, state of the evidence, briefing on, dig into, deep dive.

2026-07-2317

food-paper

PangenomeAI/academic-skills-food-nutrition

Multi-subagent manuscript system for food & nutrition science covering the whole research process: understand the field, frame research questions, curate and analyze data, run statistics, build figures and tables, construct the discussion, draft, polish, and self-review — journal-aware throughout. Includes a format-convert mode that reformats an already-finished manuscript to another journal's structure and reference style without touching the science. Use to write, outline, revise, polish, or reformat a food-science paper or any section. Triggers: write my paper, draft a manuscript, food science paper, outline my paper, revise my manuscript, analyze my data and write it up, statistics for my paper, polish my manuscript, format for a journal, reformat my manuscript for a different journal, change the journal format, convert to another journal style, my paper is finished I just need the formatting.

2026-07-2317

food-research

PangenomeAI/academic-skills-food-nutrition

Run a comprehensive, multi-source literature and evidence-synthesis workflow for food & nutrition science. Use when the user wants to research a food/nutrition topic in depth, do a literature review, build an evidence brief, screen and synthesize many sources, verify citations, or scope a systematic review. Coordinates food-science databases, preprints, semantic search, and food-safety/regulatory sources; runs a four-layer search, two-phase screening, and cross-source synthesis via subagents; grades evidence and maps gaps. Triggers: research this topic, deep literature review, comprehensive review, evidence synthesis, systematic review, scope a review, find all the literature, what does the evidence say, food science research, nutrition evidence, survey the field.

2026-07-2317

agri-deep-research

PangenomeAI/academic-skills-food-nutrition

Deep research producing a fully written, source-validated literature review on an agricultural question, as a senior agricultural scientist of the relevant discipline: scope, design the method, discover and screen by journal ranking, validate every source, extract and verify evidence, synthesize, stress-test, then write and format the review through an editorial and integrity loop. Same 12-subagent machinery as food-deep-research, grounded in agriculture and multidisciplinary literature (Q1/Q2 preferred, Q4 avoided). Use standalone for an agricultural deep dive, or as the engine called by agri-research. Triggers: deep research agriculture, investigate this agronomy question, agricultural literature review, state of the evidence in soil science, deep dive crop research.

2026-07-2317

agri-paper

PangenomeAI/academic-skills-food-nutrition

Multi-subagent manuscript system for agricultural science, written as a senior agricultural scientist of the relevant discipline: understand the field, frame questions, curate data, run statistics, build figures and tables, construct the discussion, draft, polish, and self-review — journal-aware throughout. Same machinery as food-paper, grounded in agriculture literature (Q1/Q2 preferred, Q4 avoided) and agricultural reporting standards for field trials, animal work and soils. Includes a format-convert mode that reformats a finished manuscript for another journal without touching the science. Triggers: write my agronomy paper, draft an agricultural manuscript, soil science paper, horticulture paper, animal science manuscript, analyze my field trial and write it up, format for an agriculture journal, reformat my manuscript for a different journal, my agricultural paper is finished I just need the formatting.

2026-07-2317

agri-research

PangenomeAI/academic-skills-food-nutrition

Run a comprehensive, multi-source literature and evidence-synthesis workflow for agricultural science, as a senior agricultural scientist of the relevant discipline (agronomy, soil science, horticulture, dairy and animal science, agricultural engineering, or agricultural economics). Same machinery as food-research, but the evidence base is agriculture and multidisciplinary literature ranked by journal quartile: Q1/Q2 agriculture journals plus the Nature, Science, Cell and PNAS families first, Q3 only for gaps, Q4 avoided. Use to research an agricultural topic in depth, do a literature review, build an evidence brief, or scope a systematic review. Triggers: research this agricultural topic, agronomy literature review, soil science evidence synthesis, horticulture review, animal science evidence, crop research, farming systems review, what does the agricultural evidence say.

2026-07-2317

name	food-function
description	Shared author-guideline skill for Royal Society of Chemistry food journals: Food & Function and Sustainable Food Technology. Use to format or check a manuscript for an RSC food journal — article types, structure, RSC superscript-numbered references, and figure specs. Triggers: submit to Food & Function, Sustainable Food Technology guidelines, RSC food formatting. Also fires when the user wants to publish on/in this journal, format a manuscript for it, or match its reference/citation style.
metadata	{"publisher":"Royal Society of Chemistry","verified":"2026-07","source":"https://www.rsc.org/journals-books-databases/author-and-reviewer-hub/authors-information/"}

RSC Food Journals — Shared Author Guideline Skill

Publisher: Royal Society of Chemistry · Verified: 2026-07 · Sources: Food & Function, Sustainable Food Technology. Use the RSC article template.

Applies to

Journal	Abbrev	Scope
Food & Function	FOOD FUNCT	Physical/biological function of food, nutrition, health effects
Sustainable Food Technology	SUSTAIN FOOD TECHNOL	Sustainable food processing/technology (open access)

Article types

Manuscript structure

Abstract: concise, unstructured (~150–200 words).
Experimental section: after Results & Discussion (RSC style).
Conflicts of interest statement: mandatory (state "There are no conflicts to declare" if none).

Reference style

RSC style: superscript numbers in order of citation; numbered reference list. Journal names abbreviated, year bold, volume italic, first page only.

Example:

1 A. B. Author and C. D. Author, Food Funct., 2023, 14, 1234.

Figures & tables

Figures ≥300 dpi (≥600 for line art); fit single (~8.3 cm) or double (~17.1 cm) column; RGB online; editable tables; cite in order. TOC graphic ~8 × 4 cm.

Submission checklist

TOC graphic + one-sentence TOC text · [ ] Abstract ~150–200 words
Experimental after Results & Discussion · [ ] RSC superscript-numbered references
Conflicts of interest statement · [ ] Data availability (RSC requirement)
Figures ≥300 dpi · [ ] Cover letter (significance / function link)

Formatting constraints

publisher: RSC
reference_style: rsc-superscript-numbered
abstract_words: 200
toc_graphic: required
methods_section: after-results   # "Experimental"
conflicts_statement: required
figure_dpi: {halftone: 300, line_art: 600}
column_widths_cm: [8.3, 17.1]