Skip to main content

review-agent-setup

Configure human-in-the-loop gating for AI agent review actions in Claude Code. Use when setting up a project where an agent may post PR reviews, comments, merges, or edit CI configuration, and you want a cryptographically auditable approval trail with Cedar-enforced gates.

ソース情報

リポジトリ
wshobson/agents
ソースの最終更新活動
2026年9月26日 15:09
検出された SKILL.md の言語
英語
スター
40,077
フォーク
4,274

インストール方法

デフォルトでは、最初にソースを確認する Prompt が選択されています。直接コマンドに切り替えるか、ローカルコピーをダウンロードすることもできます。

ソースファイルを確認

インストールを決める前に、SKILL.md と SkillsMP に表示されている付属ファイルをお読みください。

SKILL.md を表示中

SKILL.md
ソースの指示 · 読み取り専用プレビュー
name
review-agent-setup
description
Configure human-in-the-loop gating for AI agent review actions in Claude Code. Use when setting up a project where an agent may post PR reviews, comments, merges, or edit CI configuration, and you want a cryptographically auditable approval trail with Cedar-enforced gates.
# review-agent-governance — Setup Gate AI agent review actions (PR reviews, comments, merges, CI edits) behind explicit human approval. Every attempt, approved or denied, produces an Ed25519-signed receipt. ## When to use this plugin Install it in projects where a Claude Code agent: - Reviews, comments on, or merges pull requests (`gh pr review`, `gh pr merge`) - Triages issues (`gh issue comment`, `gh issue close`) - Publishes releases (`gh release create`) - Modifies CI configuration (`.github/workflows/`, `.gitlab-ci.yml`) - Pushes to protected branches (`main`, `master`, `release`, `production`) - Posts to external notification surfaces (Slack webhooks, Discord), once you add a rule for the command that posts (the default policy does not gate them) If the agent is only doing local file edits and running tests, this plugin is overkill. Use `protect-mcp` for general tool-call policy enforcement and skip this one. ## One-time setup ### 1. Install the plugin ```bash claude plugin install wshobson/agents/review-agent-governance ``` ### 2. Copy the default policy to your project ```bash cp .claude/plugins/review-agent-governance/policies/review-agent-governance.cedar \ ./review-governance.cedar ``` You can edit this file to match your project's specific rules. See `../agents/review-policy-author.md` for guidance on authoring review policies. ### 3. Create a receipts directory and sign key ```bash mkdir -p ./review-receipts echo "/review-receipts/" >> .gitignore echo "/review-governance.key" >> .gitignore echo "/.review-approved" >> .gitignore if [ ! -e ./review-governance.key ]; then d=$(mktemp -d) && npx protect-mcp@0.7.4 init --dir "$d" && mv "$d/keys/gateway.json" ./review-governance.key fi ``` protect-mcp 0.7.4 `sign` does not create the key, so the last command creates it, and it never replaces an existing key. Without a key, the receipts are unsigned. To rotate the key, archive `./review-governance.key` and `./review-receipts/receipts.jsonl` first, then run the command again. Give auditors the `publicKey` value from `./review-governance.key`. Do not commit the file, because it also holds the private key. ## Per-session workflow The Cedar policy denies review-surface actions unconditionally. To approve a specific action, open an approval window before it and close it after. ### Flag file (simplest) ```bash # Before the action you want to approve touch ./.review-approved # Let Claude Code run the review / comment / merge # Immediately after rm ./.review-approved ``` ### Slash command (from within Claude Code) ``` /approve-review "Reviewing PR #123 authored by contributor X" ``` This creates `./.review-approved` with the given reason embedded as a note, and records the reason in an unsigned approval log under `./review-receipts/approvals/`. A follow-up `rm` is still needed to close the window. ### Dry-run everything (force full policy evaluation) If you want every tool call to go through Cedar with no approval bypass: ```bash export REVIEW_APPROVAL_FLAG=./.never-approve ``` Any tool call matching a forbid rule will be denied; approved windows have no effect. Useful for CI or for a locked-down audit run. ## Verifying the receipts List all receipts: ```bash ls -la ./review-receipts/ ``` Verify every receipt offline with the public key: ```bash PUB=$(node -p 'JSON.parse(require("fs").readFileSync("./review-governance.key")).publicKey') npx @veritasacta/verify@0.9.2 --replay-chain ./review-receipts/receipts.jsonl --key "$PUB" ``` Exit 0 means every receipt verified. Exit 1 means a receipt failed verification, because it was tampered with, the key is wrong, or a line is malformed. Exit 2 means the receipts file could not be read. A denied call never runs, so it has no receipt. To see what the policy blocked, run this inside Claude Code: ``` /list-pending ``` It lists the tool calls that the PreToolUse hook blocked in the current session, with the tool name and the command or path. ## Example: approving a PR review ```bash # 1. Human reviews the agent's proposed comment $ /list-pending Blocked in this session: - Bash "gh pr review 42 --approve --body 'LGTM'" - Bash "gh pr comment 42 --body 'Looking good'" # 2. Human decides the first one is appropriate, approves it $ /approve-review "Approving LGTM on PR 42 after visual inspection" ./.review-approved created # 3. Agent retries the action; this time it succeeds $ agent: gh pr review 42 --approve --body "LGTM" [receipt appended to ./review-receipts/receipts.jsonl, decision=allow] # 4. Human closes the window $ rm ./.review-approved ``` The allowed call has a signed receipt that anyone with the public key can verify offline. The denied attempt has no receipt, and the approval log is not signed, so keep both in mind when you show the trail to an auditor. ## Composing with protect-mcp If both plugins are installed, each plugin's `hooks/hooks.json` registers its own PreToolUse hook, and Claude Code runs both on every tool call: ```json { "type": "command", "command": "\"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}\"/hooks/evaluate.sh" } ``` Each `evaluate.sh` reads `tool_name` and `tool_input` from the hook payload on stdin (Claude Code sets no `TOOL_NAME` variable) and evaluates its own policy: `./protect.cedar` for protect-mcp and `./review-governance.cedar` here. Both hooks must pass for the tool call to proceed. Cedar deny in either policy blocks it. ## Standards - **Ed25519** — RFC 8032 (digital signatures) - **JCS** — RFC 8785 (deterministic JSON canonicalization) - **Cedar** — AWS's open authorization policy language - **IETF draft** — [draft-farley-acta-signed-receipts](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-farley-acta-signed-receipts/)
GitHubで見る