Skip to main content

review-agent-setup

Configure human-in-the-loop gating for AI agent review actions in Claude Code. Use when setting up a project where an agent may post PR reviews, comments, merges, or edit CI configuration, and you want a cryptographically auditable approval trail with Cedar-enforced gates.

インストールへ移動

ソース情報

リポジトリ
wshobson/agents
ソースの最終更新活動
2026年9月13日 13:40
検出された SKILL.md の言語
英語
スター
39,856
フォーク
4,249

インストール方法

デフォルトでは、最初にソースを確認する Prompt が選択されています。直接コマンドに切り替えるか、ローカルコピーをダウンロードすることもできます。

ソースファイルを確認

インストールを決める前に、SKILL.md と SkillsMP に表示されている付属ファイルをお読みください。

SKILL.md を表示中

SKILL.md
ソースの指示 · 読み取り専用プレビュー
name
review-agent-setup
description
Configure human-in-the-loop gating for AI agent review actions in Claude Code. Use when setting up a project where an agent may post PR reviews, comments, merges, or edit CI configuration, and you want a cryptographically auditable approval trail with Cedar-enforced gates.
# review-agent-governance — Setup Gate AI agent review actions (PR reviews, comments, merges, CI edits) behind explicit human approval. Every attempt, approved or denied, produces an Ed25519-signed receipt. ## When to use this plugin Install it in projects where a Claude Code agent: - Reviews, comments on, or merges pull requests (`gh pr review`, `gh pr merge`) - Triages issues (`gh issue comment`, `gh issue close`) - Publishes releases (`gh release create`) - Modifies CI configuration (`.github/workflows/`, `.gitlab-ci.yml`) - Pushes to protected branches (`main`, `master`, `release`, `production`) - Posts to external notification surfaces (Slack webhooks, Discord) If the agent is only doing local file edits and running tests, this plugin is overkill. Use `protect-mcp` for general tool-call policy enforcement and skip this one. ## One-time setup ### 1. Install the plugin ```bash claude plugin install wshobson/agents/review-agent-governance ``` ### 2. Copy the default policy to your project ```bash cp .claude/plugins/review-agent-governance/policies/review-agent-governance.cedar \ ./review-governance.cedar ``` You can edit this file to match your project's specific rules. See `../agents/review-policy-author.md` for guidance on authoring review policies. ### 3. Create a receipts directory and sign key ```bash mkdir -p ./review-receipts echo "./review-receipts/" >> .gitignore echo "./review-governance.key" >> .gitignore echo "./.review-approved" >> .gitignore ``` The first invocation of `protect-mcp sign` will create the key. Commit the public key from the first receipt so auditors can verify later. ## Per-session workflow The Cedar policy denies review-surface actions unconditionally. To approve a specific action, open an approval window before it and close it after. ### Flag file (simplest) ```bash # Before the action you want to approve touch ./.review-approved # Let Claude Code run the review / comment / merge # Immediately after rm ./.review-approved ``` ### Slash command (from within Claude Code) ``` /approve-review "Reviewing PR #123 authored by contributor X" ``` This creates `./.review-approved` with the given reason embedded as a note, and writes a human-approved receipt to the chain. A follow-up `rm` is still needed to close the window. ### Dry-run everything (force full policy evaluation) If you want every tool call to go through Cedar with no approval bypass: ```bash export REVIEW_APPROVAL_FLAG=./.never-approve ``` Any tool call matching a forbid rule will be denied; approved windows have no effect. Useful for CI or for a locked-down audit run. ## Verifying the chain List all receipts: ```bash ls -la ./review-receipts/ ``` Verify the entire chain offline: ```bash npx @veritasacta/verify ./review-receipts/*.json ``` Exit 0 means every receipt is authentic and the chain is intact. Exit 1 means one receipt has been tampered with. Exit 2 means a receipt is malformed. Look at recent denials: ``` /list-pending ``` Within Claude Code this slash command walks the receipt chain and prints any recent `decision: deny` entries with the tool name, command pattern, and timestamp. ## Example: approving a PR review ```bash # 1. Human reviews the agent's proposed comment $ /list-pending Recent denials: - 2026-04-17T14:23:01Z Bash "gh pr review 42 --approve --body 'LGTM'" - 2026-04-17T14:23:02Z Bash "gh pr comment 42 --body 'Looking good'" # 2. Human decides the first one is appropriate, approves it $ /approve-review "Approving LGTM on PR 42 after visual inspection" ./.review-approved created # 3. Agent retries the action; this time it succeeds $ agent: gh pr review 42 --approve --body "LGTM" [receipt: rec_XXX, decision=allow, reason=human_approved] # 4. Human closes the window $ rm ./.review-approved ``` Every step is in the receipt chain. The chain is offline-verifiable for regulators, counterparties, or downstream auditors who want to confirm that no review action bypassed the human gate. ## Composing with protect-mcp If both plugins are installed, each plugin's `hooks/hooks.json` registers its own PreToolUse hook, and Claude Code runs both on every tool call: ```json { "type": "command", "command": "\"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}\"/hooks/evaluate.sh" } ``` Each `evaluate.sh` reads `tool_name` and `tool_input` from the hook payload on stdin (Claude Code sets no `TOOL_NAME` variable) and evaluates its own policy: `./protect.cedar` for protect-mcp and `./review-governance.cedar` here. Both hooks must pass for the tool call to proceed. Cedar deny in either policy blocks it. ## Standards - **Ed25519** — RFC 8032 (digital signatures) - **JCS** — RFC 8785 (deterministic JSON canonicalization) - **Cedar** — AWS's open authorization policy language - **IETF draft** — [draft-farley-acta-signed-receipts](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-farley-acta-signed-receipts/)
GitHubで見る