Skip to main content

review-agent-setup

Configure human-in-the-loop gating for AI agent review actions in Claude Code. Use when setting up a project where an agent may post PR reviews, comments, merges, or edit CI configuration, and you want a cryptographically auditable approval trail with Cedar-enforced gates.

설치로 이동

소스 정보

저장소
wshobson/agents
최근 소스 활동
2026년 9월 13일 13:40
감지된 SKILL.md 언어
영어
스타
39,753
포크
4,236

설치 방법

기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.

소스 파일 검토

설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.

SKILL.md 표시 중

SKILL.md
소스 지침 · 읽기 전용 미리보기
name
review-agent-setup
description
Configure human-in-the-loop gating for AI agent review actions in Claude Code. Use when setting up a project where an agent may post PR reviews, comments, merges, or edit CI configuration, and you want a cryptographically auditable approval trail with Cedar-enforced gates.
# review-agent-governance — Setup Gate AI agent review actions (PR reviews, comments, merges, CI edits) behind explicit human approval. Every attempt, approved or denied, produces an Ed25519-signed receipt. ## When to use this plugin Install it in projects where a Claude Code agent: - Reviews, comments on, or merges pull requests (`gh pr review`, `gh pr merge`) - Triages issues (`gh issue comment`, `gh issue close`) - Publishes releases (`gh release create`) - Modifies CI configuration (`.github/workflows/`, `.gitlab-ci.yml`) - Pushes to protected branches (`main`, `master`, `release`, `production`) - Posts to external notification surfaces (Slack webhooks, Discord) If the agent is only doing local file edits and running tests, this plugin is overkill. Use `protect-mcp` for general tool-call policy enforcement and skip this one. ## One-time setup ### 1. Install the plugin ```bash claude plugin install wshobson/agents/review-agent-governance ``` ### 2. Copy the default policy to your project ```bash cp .claude/plugins/review-agent-governance/policies/review-agent-governance.cedar \ ./review-governance.cedar ``` You can edit this file to match your project's specific rules. See `../agents/review-policy-author.md` for guidance on authoring review policies. ### 3. Create a receipts directory and sign key ```bash mkdir -p ./review-receipts echo "./review-receipts/" >> .gitignore echo "./review-governance.key" >> .gitignore echo "./.review-approved" >> .gitignore ``` The first invocation of `protect-mcp sign` will create the key. Commit the public key from the first receipt so auditors can verify later. ## Per-session workflow The Cedar policy denies review-surface actions unconditionally. To approve a specific action, open an approval window before it and close it after. ### Flag file (simplest) ```bash # Before the action you want to approve touch ./.review-approved # Let Claude Code run the review / comment / merge # Immediately after rm ./.review-approved ``` ### Slash command (from within Claude Code) ``` /approve-review "Reviewing PR #123 authored by contributor X" ``` This creates `./.review-approved` with the given reason embedded as a note, and writes a human-approved receipt to the chain. A follow-up `rm` is still needed to close the window. ### Dry-run everything (force full policy evaluation) If you want every tool call to go through Cedar with no approval bypass: ```bash export REVIEW_APPROVAL_FLAG=./.never-approve ``` Any tool call matching a forbid rule will be denied; approved windows have no effect. Useful for CI or for a locked-down audit run. ## Verifying the chain List all receipts: ```bash ls -la ./review-receipts/ ``` Verify the entire chain offline: ```bash npx @veritasacta/verify ./review-receipts/*.json ``` Exit 0 means every receipt is authentic and the chain is intact. Exit 1 means one receipt has been tampered with. Exit 2 means a receipt is malformed. Look at recent denials: ``` /list-pending ``` Within Claude Code this slash command walks the receipt chain and prints any recent `decision: deny` entries with the tool name, command pattern, and timestamp. ## Example: approving a PR review ```bash # 1. Human reviews the agent's proposed comment $ /list-pending Recent denials: - 2026-04-17T14:23:01Z Bash "gh pr review 42 --approve --body 'LGTM'" - 2026-04-17T14:23:02Z Bash "gh pr comment 42 --body 'Looking good'" # 2. Human decides the first one is appropriate, approves it $ /approve-review "Approving LGTM on PR 42 after visual inspection" ./.review-approved created # 3. Agent retries the action; this time it succeeds $ agent: gh pr review 42 --approve --body "LGTM" [receipt: rec_XXX, decision=allow, reason=human_approved] # 4. Human closes the window $ rm ./.review-approved ``` Every step is in the receipt chain. The chain is offline-verifiable for regulators, counterparties, or downstream auditors who want to confirm that no review action bypassed the human gate. ## Composing with protect-mcp If both plugins are installed, each plugin's `hooks/hooks.json` registers its own PreToolUse hook, and Claude Code runs both on every tool call: ```json { "type": "command", "command": "\"${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}\"/hooks/evaluate.sh" } ``` Each `evaluate.sh` reads `tool_name` and `tool_input` from the hook payload on stdin (Claude Code sets no `TOOL_NAME` variable) and evaluates its own policy: `./protect.cedar` for protect-mcp and `./review-governance.cedar` here. Both hooks must pass for the tool call to proceed. Cedar deny in either policy blocks it. ## Standards - **Ed25519** — RFC 8032 (digital signatures) - **JCS** — RFC 8785 (deterministic JSON canonicalization) - **Cedar** — AWS's open authorization policy language - **IETF draft** — [draft-farley-acta-signed-receipts](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-farley-acta-signed-receipts/)
GitHub에서 보기