| name | operationalization |
| description | SOP: operationalize abstract concepts into measurable indicators and methods |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| category | hypothesis-formation |
| type | sop |
| campaign | hypothesis-formulation |
| input | Abstract variable description (from variable-identification output) |
| output | Operational definition + measurement method + validity argument (content/construct/criterion) |
| dependencies | {"skills":["subagent-spawning"]} |
Operationalization
Convert the abstract concepts in a hypothesis into concrete, measurable indicators, and argue for measurement validity.
HARD-GATE
Preconditions (all must hold before starting):
1. At least 1 variable needs operationalizing (especially when operationalizable ≠ "high")
2. The variable's theoretical definition is provided (from the description field of variable-identification)
Not satisfied → stop, return error: variable-identification must be completed first.
Pipeline
- Precondition check: verify completeness of the variable description
- Concept analysis: decompose the variable's core attributes (conceptual dimensions)
- Indicator selection: select 1-2 measurable indicators for each dimension
- Measurement method determination: specify the data collection method (survey/experiment/observation/archival/computational)
- Validity argument:
- Content validity: do the indicators cover all key dimensions of the concept?
- Construct validity: do the indicators converge with related constructs and diverge from unrelated ones?
- Criterion validity: are the indicators correlated with a validated standard measure?
- Output the operational definition
Output Format
[
{
"variable": "Variable name",
"theoretical_definition": "Abstract definition",
"dimensions": ["Dimension 1", "Dimension 2"],
"indicators": [
{
"indicator": "Indicator name",
"measurement_method": "How to collect/measure"