用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt;运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill operationalization命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地?可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
正在显示 SKILL.md
Strategy: Dialectic engine retuned for truth-seeking, not survival. A defender steelmans a claim into its MOST falsifiable form, a critic attacks to refute it, a judge classifies the exchange into BROKEN/CORROBORATED/UNFALSIFIABLE — the judge does NOT pick a winner or score persuasiveness. Methods: Irving debate (repurposed), Toulmin argumentation, Mayo severe testing.
Campaign: Logical extreme and boundary testing via reductio ad absurdum and edge-case analysis. Core question: Does this artifact collapse under logical limits and boundary conditions? Methods: Lakatos 1976, Dutilh Novaes 2016, BVA, Flyvbjerg Critical Case, Popper.
Campaign for mapping argument structures — extract claims, link evidence, assess strength, synthesize positions. Produces argument graphs in the wiki vault.
基于 SOC 职业分类
| name | operationalization |
| description | SOP: operationalize abstract concepts into measurable indicators and methods |
| version | 1.0.0 |
| category | hypothesis-formation |
| type | sop |
| campaign | hypothesis-formulation |
| input | Abstract variable description (from variable-identification output) |
| output | Operational definition + measurement method + validity argument (content/construct/criterion) |
| dependencies | {"skills":["subagent-spawning"]} |
Convert the abstract concepts in a hypothesis into concrete, measurable indicators, and argue for measurement validity.
Not satisfied → stop, return error: variable-identification must be completed first.
[
{
"variable": "Variable name",
"theoretical_definition": "Abstract definition",
"dimensions": ["Dimension 1", "Dimension 2"],
"indicators": [
{
"indicator": "Indicator name",
"measurement_method": "How to collect/measure"