Verifies that every entry in a bibliography ACTUALLY EXISTS by cross-checking it against four keyless public scholarly APIs (Crossref, OpenAlex, Semantic Scholar, arXiv) with a polite mailto identifier, resolving DOI/arXiv IDs, fuzzy-matching title and authors (difflib SequenceMatcher ratio >=0.70), flagging retractions marked in Crossref (update-to) or OpenAlex (is_retracted), and emitting per-entry JSON verdicts mapped to the AlterLab citation-hallucination taxonomy (TF/PAC/IH/PH/SH). Accepts BibTeX, a DOI/arXiv ID list, or free-form references; degrades gracefully offline by emitting 'unverified' verdicts and never silently passing. Use when the request mentions verify citations, check references, fabricated or hallucinated references, fake DOI, retraction check, bibliography audit, or reference existence check. Does NOT write or draft papers — for authoring a manuscript (whose citation-check mode inserts citations) prefer alterlab-paper-writer instead. Part of the AlterLab Academic Skills suite.
Verifies that every entry in a bibliography ACTUALLY EXISTS by cross-checking it against four keyless public scholarly APIs (Crossref, OpenAlex, Semantic Scholar, arXiv) with a polite mailto identifier, resolving DOI/arXiv IDs, fuzzy-matching title and authors (difflib SequenceMatcher ratio >=0.70), flagging retractions marked in Crossref (update-to) or OpenAlex (is_retracted), and emitting per-entry JSON verdicts mapped to the AlterLab citation-hallucination taxonomy (TF/PAC/IH/PH/SH). Accepts BibTeX, a DOI/arXiv ID list, or free-form references; degrades gracefully offline by emitting 'unverified' verdicts and never silently passing. Use when the request mentions verify citations, check references, fabricated or hallucinated references, fake DOI, retraction check, bibliography audit, or reference existence check. Does NOT write or draft papers — for authoring a manuscript (whose citation-check mode inserts citations) prefer alterlab-paper-writer instead. Part of the AlterLab Academic Skills suite.
No API key required — cross-checks four keyless public scholarly APIs (Crossref, OpenAlex, Semantic Scholar, arXiv) via WebFetch and `uv run python`; degrades gracefully offline to 'unverified' verdicts
metadata
{"skill-author":"AlterLab","version":"1.0.0","last_updated":"2026-06-06","depends_on":"alterlab-research-pipeline (shares the integrity taxonomy), alterlab-deep-research"}
Citation Verifier — Existence-Verify a Bibliography Against Public Scholarly APIs
The headline existence-verification skill: given a bibliography in any common
form, it proves entry-by-entry whether each reference actually exists by
querying four keyless public scholarly APIs, then maps each result to the
canonical AlterLab citation-hallucination taxonomy. It is the deterministic,
network-grounded companion to the LLM-driven integrity_verification_agent —
where that agent uses WebSearch + judgment, this skill uses authoritative API
records and a reproducible Python script, so the same input always yields the
same verdicts.
Quick Start
Verify the citations in references.bib
Check whether these DOIs resolve to the papers I cited
Audit my bibliography for fabricated / hallucinated references
Does this reference list contain any fake citations or retractions?
→ Run scripts/verify_citations.py over the bibliography, read the JSON, then
present a verdict table grouped by severity. Always state the offline/degraded
status explicitly if the network was unavailable.
WHAT This Does
For each bibliography entry the script:
Parses the input (auto-detects BibTeX / DOI-list / free-form), extracting
title, authors, year, venue, DOI, and arXiv ID.
Resolves identifiers — looks up the cited DOI/arXiv ID directly when present.
Searches by title as a fallback across all four sources.
Fuzzy-matches the cited title (difflib SequenceMatcher ratio, default
threshold 0.70) and computes author-surname overlap.
Flags retractions marked in Crossref (update-to: retraction) or OpenAlex
(is_retracted).
Emits a verdict per entry mapped to the taxonomy below, plus a repo-level
summary.verdict (PASS / PASS_WITH_CONDITIONS / FAIL / UNVERIFIED).
Whether a claim is supported by its source (SH) → claim_verification_protocol (Phase E)
Reproducible, scriptable, offline-capable existence check
Markdown dead-link audit → alterlab-link-health
This skill answers "does the cited work exist, and does its identifier point
to it?" It does not read the cited paper's full text, so it cannot by
itself confirm Semantic Hallucination (does the source support the claim?) —
that requires claim_verification_protocol. SH is surfaced only as an advisory
flag, never asserted from API metadata alone.
Verdict Taxonomy (mirrors the canonical Five-Type Taxonomy)
Identical codes and definitions to
alterlab-research-pipeline/agents/integrity_verification_agent.md
(GPTZero × NeurIPS 2025; Ansari, 2026). Severity feeds the same
SERIOUS / MEDIUM / MINOR scale used in the Integrity Report schema.
Code
Name
Severity
Script trigger
verified
— (exists, matches)
NONE
Title ratio >= threshold AND author overlap OK AND year consistent in >=1 authoritative source
TF
Total Fabrication
SERIOUS
Found in no source; OR cited DOI/arXiv ID did not resolve anywhere and no close title match exists
PAC
Partial Attribute Corruption
MEDIUM
Entry found but >=1 metadata field disagrees (year mismatch, author overlap < 50%, or title ratio < threshold)
IH
Identifier Hijacking
SERIOUS
Cited DOI/arXiv ID resolved (method=id) but the resolved record's title is unrelated (ratio < threshold)
PH
Placeholder Hallucination
SERIOUS
Unresolved template/placeholder ([CITATION NEEDED], \cite{}, et al., YYYY, TODO, forthcoming) — caught pre-network
SH
Semantic Hallucination
SERIOUS
Entry resolves but does not support its claim — advisory only; requires Phase E to assert
unverified
— (could not check)
MEDIUM
Offline, or all APIs failed for this entry. Never treated as passing.
A RETRACTED flag is attached (and severity bumped to SERIOUS) whenever Crossref
or OpenAlex marks the matched work as retracted, independent of the existence
verdict.
Repo-level verdict
PASS — every entry verified, no SERIOUS/MEDIUM flags.
PASS_WITH_CONDITIONS — only PAC / MEDIUM issues (wrong metadata, fixable).
FAIL — any SERIOUS verdict (TF / IH / PH / retraction).
UNVERIFIED — entries are unverified and no concrete fabrication was found
(e.g. fully offline run). This is not a pass — re-run with network access.
Pipeline (how to run it)
1. Locate or capture the bibliography
Accept any of: a .bib file, a .txt list of DOIs/arXiv IDs, a pasted
reference list, or inline text. The script auto-detects the format; override
with --format bibtex|doi|freeform if detection is wrong.
path/to/references.bib may also be - (stdin) or inline text.
--threshold tunes the fuzzy title-match ratio (0..1; default 0.70).
--offline skips the network and emits unverified verdicts deliberately.
Omit --out to print the JSON report to stdout.
The script auto-selects an HTTP backend: it uses requests if installed, else
falls back to the Python stdlib (urllib) — so it runs with zero extra
dependencies in a bare uv environment.
3. Read the JSON and report
Parse summary.verdict and the per-entry verdict codes. Present:
The headline verdict and counts (verdict_counts, severity_counts).
A table of every non-verified entry with its code, severity, and detail.
For each TF / IH / PH: quote the cited entry and explain the evidence
(e.g. "DOI 10.x resolved to an unrelated paper titled '…'").
Any RETRACTED flags, prominently.
If verdict == UNVERIFIED: state plainly that nothing was confirmed and relay
the per-entry manual_instructions.
4. Route fixes
TF / PH → the reference must be removed or replaced; it does not exist.
IH → the DOI/arXiv ID is wrong; find and substitute the correct identifier.
PAC → correct the specific metadata field(s) named in detail.
RETRACTED → flag to the author; cite the retraction notice or drop the source.
Graceful Degradation (no network)
Network failures are never silently swallowed into a pass:
A DNS/connection failure raises NetworkUnavailable; the entry becomes
unverified with a populated manual_instructions field.
--offline forces every networked entry to unverified up front (placeholders
are still caught locally as PH).
The repo-level verdict becomes UNVERIFIED (distinct from PASS) whenever
unverified entries exist without any concrete fabrication finding.
When degraded, instruct the user to re-run with connectivity, and fall back to
the LLM-driven integrity_verification_agent (WebSearch) for a manual pass.
Output Shape (excerpt)
{"tool":"alterlab-citation-verifier/verify_citations.py","version":"1.0.0","summary":{"total":2,"verdict":"FAIL","verdict_counts":{"verified":1,"TF":1,"PAC":0,"IH":0,"PH":0,"SH":0,"unverified":0},"severity_counts":{"SERIOUS":1,"MEDIUM":0,"MINOR":0},"citation_integrity_score":0.5,"fabrication_risk_score":0.5,"retracted":0},"entries":[{"ref_id":"walters2023","verdict":"verified","severity":"NONE","title_ratio":1.0,"author_overlap":1.0,"matches":[{"source":"crossref"}]},{"ref_id":"ghostpaper2021","verdict":"TF","severity":"SERIOUS","detail":"Cited DOI/arXiv identifier did not resolve in any source..."}]}
citation_integrity_score and fabrication_risk_score (both 0..1) align with
the Integrity Report schema fields of the same name, so the report can feed
alterlab-research-pipeline's integrity gate directly.
Self-Check Before Reporting
Did the run reach the network? If config.http_backend ran but every entry is
unverified, the network was down — say so; do not imply a pass.
Are there any RETRACTED flags? Surface them even on otherwise-verified entries.
Did any entry score IH? Confirm the detail shows an id-resolved mismatch,
not a loose title-search coincidence (the script enforces this distinction).
Is the headline verdict consistent with the per-entry codes (any SERIOUS → FAIL)?
References
alterlab-research-pipeline/agents/integrity_verification_agent.md — canonical
Five-Type Taxonomy, compound-deception patterns, and the Lin et al. (2020)
mashup case study this skill is built to catch.
alterlab-research-pipeline/references/claim_verification_protocol.md — Phase E
claim-vs-source verification (the SH check this skill defers to).
shared/schemas/integrity_report.schema.json — the integrity-report shape whose
citation_integrity_score / fabrication_risk_score this skill mirrors.
Walters, W. H., & Wilder, E. I. (2023). Fabrication and errors in the
bibliographic citations generated by ChatGPT. Scientific Reports, 13, 14045.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41032-5
Ansari, S. (2026). Compound Deception in Elite Peer Review. arXiv:2602.05930.
