Skip to main content

architecture

Create or evaluate an architecture decision record (ADR). Use when choosing between technologies (e.g., Kafka vs SQS), documenting a design decision with trade-offs and consequences, reviewing a system design proposal, or designing a new component from requirements and constraints.

소스 정보

저장소
anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins
최근 소스 활동
2026년 3월 13일 15:57
감지된 SKILL.md 언어
영어
스타
32,945
포크
3,632

설치 방법

기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.

소스 파일 검토

설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.

SKILL.md 표시 중

SKILL.md
소스 지침 · 읽기 전용 미리보기
name
architecture
description
Create or evaluate an architecture decision record (ADR). Use when choosing between technologies (e.g., Kafka vs SQS), documenting a design decision with trade-offs and consequences, reviewing a system design proposal, or designing a new component from requirements and constraints.
argument-hint
<decision or system to design>
# /architecture > If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see [CONNECTORS.md](../../CONNECTORS.md). Create an Architecture Decision Record (ADR) or evaluate a system design. ## Usage ``` /architecture $ARGUMENTS ``` ## Modes **Create an ADR**: "Should we use Kafka or SQS for our event bus?" **Evaluate a design**: "Review this microservices proposal" **System design**: "Design the notification system for our app" See the **system-design** skill for detailed frameworks on requirements gathering, scalability analysis, and trade-off evaluation. ## Output — ADR Format ```markdown # ADR-[number]: [Title] **Status:** Proposed | Accepted | Deprecated | Superseded **Date:** [Date] **Deciders:** [Who needs to sign off] ## Context [What is the situation? What forces are at play?] ## Decision [What is the change we're proposing?] ## Options Considered ### Option A: [Name] | Dimension | Assessment | |-----------|------------| | Complexity | [Low/Med/High] | | Cost | [Assessment] | | Scalability | [Assessment] | | Team familiarity | [Assessment] | **Pros:** [List] **Cons:** [List] ### Option B: [Name] [Same format] ## Trade-off Analysis [Key trade-offs between options with clear reasoning] ## Consequences - [What becomes easier] - [What becomes harder] - [What we'll need to revisit] ## Action Items 1. [ ] [Implementation step] 2. [ ] [Follow-up] ``` ## If Connectors Available If **~~knowledge base** is connected: - Search for prior ADRs and design docs - Find relevant technical context If **~~project tracker** is connected: - Link to related epics and tickets - Create implementation tasks ## Tips 1. **State constraints upfront** — "We need to ship in 2 weeks" or "Must handle 10K rps" shapes the answer. 2. **Name your options** — Even if you're leaning one way, I'll give a more balanced analysis with explicit alternatives. 3. **Include non-functional requirements** — Latency, cost, team expertise, and maintenance burden matter as much as features.
GitHub에서 보기