소스 정보
- 저장소
- benjam3n/reasoningtool
- 최근 소스 활동
- 2026년 3월 12일 17:48
- 감지된 SKILL.md 언어
- 영어
- 스타
- 9
- 포크
- 0
설치 방법
기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.
소스 파일 검토
설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.
메뉴
기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.
설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
직접 명령은 검토 Prompt를 거치지 않습니다. 실행하기 전에 소스를 확인하세요.
npx skills add https://github.com/benjam3n/reasoningtool --skill pvg명령은 한 줄로 유지됩니다. 복사하기 전에 가로로 스크롤해 전체 내용을 확인하세요.
로컬 사본을 원하시나요? SkillsMP에서 현재 제공할 수 있는 파일을 다운로드하세요.
Route any input through a branching question tree to narrow down the optimal response strategy before writing. Two stages — PERCEIVE (classify input) then ACT (select response). Covers all prompt types.
Generate exhaustive guesses about user input using ALL search methods with coverage tracking. Guessing is SEARCH through possibility space. Tracks space created vs space covered to ensure comprehensive exploration.
Systematically evaluate and select from a set of guesses, options, or possibilities. Combines ARAW analysis with prioritization to determine which guesses are strong, weak, actionable, or eliminable.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
SKILL.md 표시 중
| name | pvg |
| description | Handler for goals focused on PREVENTING bad outcomes rather than achieving good ones. |
| output | {"format":"prose"} |
Input: $ARGUMENTS
Handler for goals focused on PREVENTING bad outcomes rather than achieving good ones. These are uniquely challenging because: success is invisible (nothing bad happened), hard to know if prevention worked or threat never materialized, easy to underinvest because ROI is hard to measure, motivation decreases when threat seems distant.
THREAT PROFILE:
Threat: [specific bad outcome]
Likelihood (no intervention): [1-5]
Severity: [1-5]
Detectability: [easy / moderate / hard / impossible until too late]
Reversibility: [easy / hard / irreversible]
Risk score: Likelihood × Severity = [score]
| Type | Description | Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Elimination | Remove the threat entirely | Change circumstances so threat can't occur |
| Reduction | Lower probability | Reduce exposure, add safeguards |
| Mitigation | Lower impact if it occurs | Insurance, buffers, backup plans |
| Detection | Catch it early | Monitoring, check-ups, alerts |
| Recovery | Bounce back faster | Resilience, redundancy, reserves |
Most prevention plans need ALL five layers (defense in depth).
Layer 1 — Elimination: Can the threat be completely removed?
Layer 2 — Reduction: If not eliminated, reduce probability:
Layer 3 — Mitigation: If it happens anyway, limit damage:
Layer 4 — Detection: Catch it approaching:
Layer 5 — Recovery: If worst case happens:
Prevention fails because people lose motivation when threats seem distant.
Strategies to maintain prevention behavior:
Since "nothing happened" is hard to measure:
| Metric Type | What to Measure | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Leading indicators | Prevention activities performed | "Exercised 4x this week" |
| Risk indicators | Threat level changes | "Blood pressure reading normal" |
| Near-miss tracking | Times threat was close but prevented | "Caught issue before it became problem" |
| Capacity indicators | Buffer levels | "Emergency fund at 6 months" |
| System health | Prevention system functioning | "All backups running, checks completed" |
PREVENTIVE GOAL ANALYSIS:
Threat: [what you're preventing]
Risk score: [likelihood × severity]
Prevention layers:
1. Elimination: [can threat be removed? how?]
2. Reduction: [how to lower probability]
3. Mitigation: [how to limit damage]
4. Detection: [early warning system]
5. Recovery: [bounce-back plan]
Motivation system:
- Habit: [tied to what routine]
- Automation: [what's automatic]
- Review schedule: [how often to reassess]
Success metrics:
1. [metric] — current: [value] — target: [value]
Investment required: [ongoing cost of prevention]
Cost of failure to prevent: [what happens without prevention]
ROI: [cost of prevention vs expected cost of failure × probability]