소스 정보
- 저장소
- claude-office-skills/skills
- 최근 소스 활동
- 2026년 1월 30일 07:06
- 감지된 SKILL.md 언어
- 영어
- 스타
- 412
- 포크
- 81
설치 방법
기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.
소스 파일 검토
설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.
메뉴
기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.
설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
직접 명령은 검토 Prompt를 거치지 않습니다. 실행하기 전에 소스를 확인하세요.
npx skills add https://github.com/claude-office-skills/skills --skill applicant-screening명령은 한 줄로 유지됩니다. 복사하기 전에 가로로 스크롤해 전체 내용을 확인하세요.
로컬 사본을 원하시나요? SkillsMP에서 현재 제공할 수 있는 파일을 다운로드하세요.
Analyze contracts for risks, check completeness, and provide actionable recommendations. Supports employment contracts, NDAs, service agreements, and more.
MCP server with 39 tools for Word, Excel, PowerPoint, PDF, OCR operations
Search and analyze academic literature. Find papers, understand research methodologies, and synthesize academic findings for research projects.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
SKILL.md 표시 중
| name | Applicant Screening |
| description | Screen job applications against requirements and score candidates |
| version | 1.0 |
| author | claude-office-skills |
| license | MIT |
| category | hr |
| tags | ["screening","hiring","recruitment","evaluation"] |
| department | HR |
| models | {"recommended":["claude-sonnet-4","claude-opus-4"],"compatible":["claude-3-5-sonnet","gpt-4","gpt-4o"]} |
| mcp | {"server":"office-mcp","tools":["extract_text_from_pdf","extract_text_from_docx","analyze_document_structure"]} |
| capabilities | ["candidate_evaluation","requirement_matching","scoring"] |
| languages | ["en","zh"] |
Screen job applications against role requirements to identify top candidates efficiently.
This skill helps you:
"Screen this resume against our [Job Title] requirements"
"Evaluate this application for the [Position] role"
"Screen these 10 applications for the Senior Developer position"
"Rank these candidates based on our requirements"
"Screen for: 5+ years Python, AWS experience required, ML nice-to-have"
## Job Requirements: [Position]
### Must-Have (Required)
| Requirement | Weight | Criteria |
|-------------|--------|----------|
| [Skill 1] | 20% | [X] years experience |
| [Skill 2] | 15% | [Certification/level] |
| [Education] | 10% | [Degree type] |
| [Experience] | 25% | [Industry/role type] |
### Nice-to-Have (Preferred)
| Requirement | Bonus | Criteria |
|-------------|-------|----------|
| [Skill 3] | +5pts | [Description] |
| [Skill 4] | +5pts | [Description] |
| [Trait] | +3pts | [Indicator] |
### Disqualifiers
- [ ] No work authorization
- [ ] Below minimum experience
- [ ] Missing required certification
- [ ] Salary expectation mismatch
# Candidate Screening: [Name]
## Quick Summary
| Attribute | Value |
|-----------|-------|
| **Position** | [Job Title] |
| **Score** | [X]/100 |
| **Recommendation** | 🟢 Interview / 🟡 Maybe / 🔴 Pass |
## Candidate Profile
- **Name**: [Full Name]
- **Location**: [City, State]
: [Title] at [Company]
: [X] years
: [Degree, School]
| Requirement | Met? | Evidence | Score |
|-------------|------|----------|-------|
| [5+ years Python] | ✅ | 7 years at 2 companies | 20/20 |
| [AWS experience] | ✅ | AWS Certified, 3 years | 15/15 |
| [Bachelor's CS] | ✅ | BS Computer Science, MIT | 10/10 |
| [Team lead exp] | ⚠️ | Led 2-person team | 5/10 |
: [X]/[Total]
| Requirement | Met? | Evidence | Bonus |
|-------------|------|----------|-------|
| [ML experience] | ✅ | Built recommendation system | +5 |
| [Startup exp] | ✅ | 2 early-stage startups | +5 |
| [Open source] | ❌ | Not mentioned | 0 |
: +[X] points
[Strength 1 with evidence]
[Strength 2 with evidence]
[Strength 3 with evidence]
[Concern 1 - question to ask in interview]
[Concern 2 - what to verify]
[If any - employment gaps, inconsistencies, etc.]
Based on this candidate's profile, consider asking:
[Question about specific experience]
[Question about concern area]
[Question about growth potential]
[2-3 sentence summary of fit]
: [X]/100
: [Interview / Phone Screen / Pass]
: [High / Medium / Low]
# Applicant Ranking: [Position]
**Date**: [Date]
**Total Applications**: [X]
**Reviewed**: [X]
## Summary
| Category | Count | % |
|----------|-------|---|
| 🟢 Strong Interview | [X] | [%] |
| 🟡 Phone Screen | [X] | [%] |
| 🔵 Maybe/Hold | [X] | [%] |
| 🔴 Not a Fit | [X] | [%] |
## Top Candidates
### 🥇 Tier 1: Strong Interview (Score 80+)
| Rank | Name | Score | Key Strengths | Concerns |
|------|------|-------|---------------|----------|
| 1 | [Name] | 92 | [Strengths] | [Concerns] |
| 2 | [Name] | 88 | [Strengths] | [Concerns] |
| 3 | [Name] | 85 | [Strengths] | [Concerns] |
### 🥈 Tier 2: Phone Screen (Score 65-79)
| Rank | Name | Score | Key Strengths | Gap to Address |
|------|------|-------|---------------|----------------|
| 4 | [Name] | 75 | [Strengths] | [Gap] |
| 5 | [Name] | 72 | [Strengths] | [Gap] |
### 🥉 Tier 3: Maybe/Hold (Score 50-64)
| Name | Score | Reason for Hold |
|------|-------|-----------------|
| [Name] | 58 | [Reason] |
### ❌ Not Proceeding (Score <50)
| Name | Score | Primary Reason |
|------|-------|----------------|
| [Name] | 45 | Missing required [X] |
| [Name] | 38 | Below minimum experience |
## Insights
### Applicant Pool Quality
[Assessment of overall pool quality]
### Common Strengths
- [Frequently seen strength]
- [Frequently seen strength]
### Common Gaps
- [What most candidates lack]
- [Skill shortage in pool]
### Recommendations
1. [Action for top candidates]
2. [Suggestion for sourcing if pool weak]
| Years | Entry | Mid | Senior | Lead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0-1 | 10/10 | 3/10 | 0/10 | 0/10 |
| 2-3 | 8/10 | 7/10 | 3/10 | 0/10 |
| 4-5 | 5/10 | 10/10 | 7/10 | 3/10 |
| 6-8 | 3/10 | 8/10 | 10/10 | 7/10 |
| 9+ | 0/10 | 5/10 | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| Level | Technical Role | Non-Technical |
|---|---|---|
| PhD | 10/10 | 8/10 |
| Master's | 9/10 | 9/10 |
| Bachelor's | 8/10 | 10/10 |
| Associate's | 5/10 | 7/10 |
| Bootcamp | 6/10 | N/A |
| Self-taught | 4/10 | N/A |