用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt,粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里,让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
直接命令不会经过审查 Prompt;运行前请先检查来源。
npx skills add https://github.com/claude-office-skills/skills --skill applicant-screening命令会保持在同一行。复制前请横向滚动并检查完整内容。
想先保存到本地?可下载 SkillsMP 当前能够提供的文件。
Analyze contracts for risks, check completeness, and provide actionable recommendations. Supports employment contracts, NDAs, service agreements, and more.
MCP server with 39 tools for Word, Excel, PowerPoint, PDF, OCR operations
Search and analyze academic literature. Find papers, understand research methodologies, and synthesize academic findings for research projects.
基于 SOC 职业分类
正在显示 SKILL.md
| name | Applicant Screening |
| description | Screen job applications against requirements and score candidates |
| version | 1.0 |
| author | claude-office-skills |
| license | MIT |
| category | hr |
| tags | ["screening","hiring","recruitment","evaluation"] |
| department | HR |
| models | {"recommended":["claude-sonnet-4","claude-opus-4"],"compatible":["claude-3-5-sonnet","gpt-4","gpt-4o"]} |
| mcp | {"server":"office-mcp","tools":["extract_text_from_pdf","extract_text_from_docx","analyze_document_structure"]} |
| capabilities | ["candidate_evaluation","requirement_matching","scoring"] |
| languages | ["en","zh"] |
Screen job applications against role requirements to identify top candidates efficiently.
This skill helps you:
"Screen this resume against our [Job Title] requirements"
"Evaluate this application for the [Position] role"
"Screen these 10 applications for the Senior Developer position"
"Rank these candidates based on our requirements"
"Screen for: 5+ years Python, AWS experience required, ML nice-to-have"
## Job Requirements: [Position]
### Must-Have (Required)
| Requirement | Weight | Criteria |
|-------------|--------|----------|
| [Skill 1] | 20% | [X] years experience |
| [Skill 2] | 15% | [Certification/level] |
| [Education] | 10% | [Degree type] |
| [Experience] | 25% | [Industry/role type] |
### Nice-to-Have (Preferred)
| Requirement | Bonus | Criteria |
|-------------|-------|----------|
| [Skill 3] | +5pts | [Description] |
| [Skill 4] | +5pts | [Description] |
| [Trait] | +3pts | [Indicator] |
### Disqualifiers
- [ ] No work authorization
- [ ] Below minimum experience
- [ ] Missing required certification
- [ ] Salary expectation mismatch
# Candidate Screening: [Name]
## Quick Summary
| Attribute | Value |
|-----------|-------|
| **Position** | [Job Title] |
| **Score** | [X]/100 |
| **Recommendation** | 🟢 Interview / 🟡 Maybe / 🔴 Pass |
## Candidate Profile
- **Name**: [Full Name]
- **Location**: [City, State]
: [Title] at [Company]
: [X] years
: [Degree, School]
| Requirement | Met? | Evidence | Score |
|-------------|------|----------|-------|
| [5+ years Python] | ✅ | 7 years at 2 companies | 20/20 |
| [AWS experience] | ✅ | AWS Certified, 3 years | 15/15 |
| [Bachelor's CS] | ✅ | BS Computer Science, MIT | 10/10 |
| [Team lead exp] | ⚠️ | Led 2-person team | 5/10 |
: [X]/[Total]
| Requirement | Met? | Evidence | Bonus |
|-------------|------|----------|-------|
| [ML experience] | ✅ | Built recommendation system | +5 |
| [Startup exp] | ✅ | 2 early-stage startups | +5 |
| [Open source] | ❌ | Not mentioned | 0 |
: +[X] points
[Strength 1 with evidence]
[Strength 2 with evidence]
[Strength 3 with evidence]
[Concern 1 - question to ask in interview]
[Concern 2 - what to verify]
[If any - employment gaps, inconsistencies, etc.]
Based on this candidate's profile, consider asking:
[Question about specific experience]
[Question about concern area]
[Question about growth potential]
[2-3 sentence summary of fit]
: [X]/100
: [Interview / Phone Screen / Pass]
: [High / Medium / Low]
# Applicant Ranking: [Position]
**Date**: [Date]
**Total Applications**: [X]
**Reviewed**: [X]
## Summary
| Category | Count | % |
|----------|-------|---|
| 🟢 Strong Interview | [X] | [%] |
| 🟡 Phone Screen | [X] | [%] |
| 🔵 Maybe/Hold | [X] | [%] |
| 🔴 Not a Fit | [X] | [%] |
## Top Candidates
### 🥇 Tier 1: Strong Interview (Score 80+)
| Rank | Name | Score | Key Strengths | Concerns |
|------|------|-------|---------------|----------|
| 1 | [Name] | 92 | [Strengths] | [Concerns] |
| 2 | [Name] | 88 | [Strengths] | [Concerns] |
| 3 | [Name] | 85 | [Strengths] | [Concerns] |
### 🥈 Tier 2: Phone Screen (Score 65-79)
| Rank | Name | Score | Key Strengths | Gap to Address |
|------|------|-------|---------------|----------------|
| 4 | [Name] | 75 | [Strengths] | [Gap] |
| 5 | [Name] | 72 | [Strengths] | [Gap] |
### 🥉 Tier 3: Maybe/Hold (Score 50-64)
| Name | Score | Reason for Hold |
|------|-------|-----------------|
| [Name] | 58 | [Reason] |
### ❌ Not Proceeding (Score <50)
| Name | Score | Primary Reason |
|------|-------|----------------|
| [Name] | 45 | Missing required [X] |
| [Name] | 38 | Below minimum experience |
## Insights
### Applicant Pool Quality
[Assessment of overall pool quality]
### Common Strengths
- [Frequently seen strength]
- [Frequently seen strength]
### Common Gaps
- [What most candidates lack]
- [Skill shortage in pool]
### Recommendations
1. [Action for top candidates]
2. [Suggestion for sourcing if pool weak]
| Years | Entry | Mid | Senior | Lead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0-1 | 10/10 | 3/10 | 0/10 | 0/10 |
| 2-3 | 8/10 | 7/10 | 3/10 | 0/10 |
| 4-5 | 5/10 | 10/10 | 7/10 | 3/10 |
| 6-8 | 3/10 | 8/10 | 10/10 | 7/10 |
| 9+ | 0/10 | 5/10 | 10/10 | 10/10 |
| Level | Technical Role | Non-Technical |
|---|---|---|
| PhD | 10/10 | 8/10 |
| Master's | 9/10 | 9/10 |
| Bachelor's | 8/10 | 10/10 |
| Associate's | 5/10 | 7/10 |
| Bootcamp | 6/10 | N/A |
| Self-taught | 4/10 | N/A |