papercuts

name	papercuts
description	Log genuine, recurring repository friction to .agents/PAPERCUTS.md — confusing setup, a flaky repo command or script, a misleading in-repo error, stale generated files, or a non-obvious gotcha that will cost the next contributor time. Also use to review, deduplicate, and resolve existing entries. Gate hard before logging: only friction the repository itself can fix counts. Never log the agent's own sandbox/permission errors, shell-scripting mistakes, transient flakiness, or third-party tool quirks the repo can't change.
metadata	{"internal":true}

Papercuts

Capture small friction in the moment without derailing the current task. Aggregated entries show where the repository needs sanding down — so the bar is that a different contributor would hit the same thing, and the repository can do something about it.

The two-question test

Log it only if both are true:

1. Reproducible for anyone. A different person, on a fresh checkout, working in this repo would hit the same friction. It is not specific to your sandbox, shell config, machine, network, or a one-time hiccup.
2. Fixable in the repo. A change to the repo's code, config, scripts, or docs would prevent or reduce it.

If either answer is "no," push through it and move on — do not log it.

Do NOT log

• Your environment's failures. Sandbox EPERM / listen / IPC-socket errors, blocked network or fetch failed, permission denials, missing system tools. That is the runner, not the repo.
• Your own shell mistakes. Reserved or special variable names (status, path), unquoted globs, a broken login-shell hook. Fix the command — there is nothing in the repo to sand down.
• Transient flakiness. A command that succeeded on retry with no repo-side cause (a network blip, a hung push, a slow mirror).
• Local state you corrupted. A partial node_modules after branch-switching, a stale dev-server port, a dirty cache. Re-run the install or cleanup.
• Third-party or beta-tool limitations the repo can't change — unless the fix is a repo-side workaround worth writing down (then log that workaround).
• Product or code correctness bugs (fix now or track as real work), and what you accomplished (that belongs in the task summary).
• Secrets, credentials, personal data, raw customer payloads, or sensitive paths.

When something fails, first ask "is this the repo, or is this me/my environment?" Only the former is a papercut.

Log proactively

1. Search .agents/PAPERCUTS.md for an equivalent entry and avoid duplicates.

2. Append one unchecked item under ## Open using this format:

   - [ ] `YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SSZ` — `agent` — <friction, and the smallest useful fix or workaround>.
   

3. Keep it to one or two sentences: what got in the way, and the likely repo-side fix. Lead with the friction, not with what you were doing.

4. Continue the original task. Do not expand a papercut into unrelated work.

Use UTC timestamps and a short agent label (codex, claude, human). Add a PR or task identifier only when it helps future triage.

Review or resolve

Only mine a whole session or do a broad review when the user explicitly asks.

When asked to review the file:

1. Re-run the two-question test on every open entry; delete any that fail it (environment/shell/flake noise that slipped in).
2. Deduplicate and group related entries.
3. Verify each surviving papercut still reproduces.
4. Fix the smallest safe, high-leverage entries first.
5. Move fixed items to ## Resolved, check them, and append the resolving date or commit. Route real bugs to normal issue/fix work; route recurring review-policy gaps through maintain-greptile-rules.

Preserve useful history for genuinely-resolved papercuts; do not delete them merely to make the file shorter. (Noise that never belonged — see step 1 — is different: remove it.)