Skip to main content

harness-reckoning

Run and interpret a read-only retrospective over Harness ledger projections, then prepare evidence-backed mechanism fixes, deletion candidates, or time-bounded rule proposals for human adjudication.

설치로 이동

소스 정보

저장소
FairladyZ625/harness-anything
최근 소스 활동
2026년 9월 19일 13:57
감지된 SKILL.md 언어
영어
스타
224
포크
6

설치 방법

기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.

소스 파일 검토

설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.

파일 탐색기
4 개 파일

SKILL.md 표시 중

SKILL.md
소스 지침 · 읽기 전용 미리보기
name
harness-reckoning
description
Run and interpret a read-only retrospective over Harness ledger projections, then prepare evidence-backed mechanism fixes, deletion candidates, or time-bounded rule proposals for human adjudication.
# Harness Reckoning Use this skill for a periodic, offline review of repeated friction without allowing the reviewer to modify rules, Tasks, Facts, or Decisions. ## Run The system preset starts paused because a new Harness may not have an agent runtime. Choose an agent and runtime instance, then enable it. Its mission invokes: ```sh ha schedule reckon ``` The command reads the attached Harness projection and writes only stdout. The occurrence runtime's final output is the report artifact. A missing projection is an error, never a healthy empty report. Open candidate evidence with the relevant read commands, such as `ha task show`, `ha runtime status`, and `ha fact show`. Do not run commands that record or change entities. Optional sources follow [references/source-contract.md](references/source-contract.md). Add their read command and evidence-merging instructions to the preset mission. ## Adjudicate Read the evidence link or identifier on every candidate. Apply the funnel in order: 1. Fix the mechanism, configuration, or error message that created the friction. 2. If no framework fix applies, propose removal of an obsolete rule. 3. Only then consider a new rule; require a trigger and expiration date. 4. A second occurrence of the same class is a structural problem, not permission for another local patch. The report is advisory. A human decides whether to create a Task, retire a rule, or propose a Decision. Quiet output is a valid health attestation; never manufacture findings. ## Boundaries Occurrence claim ownership (`nodeId` plus `claimFence`) supplies multi-node mutual exclusion. Each result belongs to its occurrence; no shared report path is used. Edge nodes read their local projection, so the report identifies local evidence rather than pretending to be a fleet-wide canonical snapshot. ## Make it yours - Edit the preset mission to change the questions, evidence depth, or report format. - Add a read-only external source and tell the mission how its evidence joins the built-in signals. - Select or replace the agent and runtime instance in the Schedule editor. The preset remains protected from deletion, but its cadence, timezone, mission, and target are yours to change. ## External source examples A software team may add a `walls` report or inspect an `AGENTS.md` retirement marker. Another team might read support escalations, operations handoffs, or a customer feedback export. These are site-specific inputs and are never part of the built-in signal set. A source must declare its read scope and return stable evidence identifiers. The method uses offline replay, external evidence, a minimal proposed difference, and human adjudication. It deliberately avoids online self-editing and append-only memory growth. See [references/method.md](references/method.md).
GitHub에서 보기