Skip to main content

harness-reckoning

Run and interpret a read-only retrospective over Harness ledger projections, then prepare evidence-backed mechanism fixes, deletion candidates, or time-bounded rule proposals for human adjudication.

Zur Installation springen

Quellinformationen

Repository
FairladyZ625/harness-anything
Letzte Quellaktivität
19. September 2026 um 13:57
Erkannte Sprache von SKILL.md
Englisch
Sterne
224
Forks
6

Installationsoptionen

Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.

Quelldateien prüfen

Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.

Datei-Explorer
4 Dateien

SKILL.md wird angezeigt

SKILL.md
Quellanweisungen · Schreibgeschützte Vorschau
name
harness-reckoning
description
Run and interpret a read-only retrospective over Harness ledger projections, then prepare evidence-backed mechanism fixes, deletion candidates, or time-bounded rule proposals for human adjudication.
# Harness Reckoning Use this skill for a periodic, offline review of repeated friction without allowing the reviewer to modify rules, Tasks, Facts, or Decisions. ## Run The system preset starts paused because a new Harness may not have an agent runtime. Choose an agent and runtime instance, then enable it. Its mission invokes: ```sh ha schedule reckon ``` The command reads the attached Harness projection and writes only stdout. The occurrence runtime's final output is the report artifact. A missing projection is an error, never a healthy empty report. Open candidate evidence with the relevant read commands, such as `ha task show`, `ha runtime status`, and `ha fact show`. Do not run commands that record or change entities. Optional sources follow [references/source-contract.md](references/source-contract.md). Add their read command and evidence-merging instructions to the preset mission. ## Adjudicate Read the evidence link or identifier on every candidate. Apply the funnel in order: 1. Fix the mechanism, configuration, or error message that created the friction. 2. If no framework fix applies, propose removal of an obsolete rule. 3. Only then consider a new rule; require a trigger and expiration date. 4. A second occurrence of the same class is a structural problem, not permission for another local patch. The report is advisory. A human decides whether to create a Task, retire a rule, or propose a Decision. Quiet output is a valid health attestation; never manufacture findings. ## Boundaries Occurrence claim ownership (`nodeId` plus `claimFence`) supplies multi-node mutual exclusion. Each result belongs to its occurrence; no shared report path is used. Edge nodes read their local projection, so the report identifies local evidence rather than pretending to be a fleet-wide canonical snapshot. ## Make it yours - Edit the preset mission to change the questions, evidence depth, or report format. - Add a read-only external source and tell the mission how its evidence joins the built-in signals. - Select or replace the agent and runtime instance in the Schedule editor. The preset remains protected from deletion, but its cadence, timezone, mission, and target are yours to change. ## External source examples A software team may add a `walls` report or inspect an `AGENTS.md` retirement marker. Another team might read support escalations, operations handoffs, or a customer feedback export. These are site-specific inputs and are never part of the built-in signal set. A source must declare its read scope and return stable evidence identifiers. The method uses offline replay, external evidence, a minimal proposed difference, and human adjudication. It deliberately avoids online self-editing and append-only memory growth. See [references/method.md](references/method.md).
Auf GitHub ansehen