Skip to main content

gentle-ai-comment-writer

Write warm, direct collaboration comments. Trigger: PR feedback, issue replies, reviews, Slack messages, or GitHub comments.

소스 정보

저장소
Gentleman-Programming/gentle-shell
최근 소스 활동
2026년 8월 25일 15:16
감지된 SKILL.md 언어
영어
스타
1,338
포크
204

설치 방법

기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.

소스 파일 검토

설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.

SKILL.md 표시 중

SKILL.md
소스 지침 · 읽기 전용 미리보기
name
gentle-ai-comment-writer
description
Write warm, direct collaboration comments. Trigger: PR feedback, issue replies, reviews, Slack messages, or GitHub comments.
license
Apache-2.0
metadata
{"author":"gentleman-programming","version":"1.0"}
## When to Use Load this skill whenever you write a comment that another human will read. Use it for: - GitHub PR or issue comments. - Review feedback and requested changes. - Maintainer replies. - Slack, Discord, or async project updates. ## Voice Rules | Rule | Requirement | |------|-------------| | Be useful fast | Start with the actionable point. Do not recap the whole PR before feedback. | | Be warm and direct | Sound like a thoughtful teammate, not a corporate bot. | | Keep it short | Prefer 1 to 3 short paragraphs or a tight bullet list. | | Explain why | Give the technical reason when asking for a change. | | Avoid pile-ons | Comment on the highest-value issue, not every tiny preference. | | Match target context language | Write in the target context language by default: Spanish issue/thread -> Spanish comment, English issue/thread -> English comment, mixed context -> target message language. If the user explicitly requests a language or tone, follow that request. Do not use the active persona as the source of truth for public comments. For Spanish comments, use neutral/professional Spanish by default unless the user or target context clearly calls for regional tone. | | No em dashes | Use commas, periods, or parentheses instead. | ## Comment Formula ```text <Direct observation or request> <Why it matters, only if needed> <Concrete next action> ``` ## Examples ### Request change ```markdown Good approach overall. I'd split this into a separate commit because it mixes validation logic with UI wiring. That keeps the reviewer's focus narrower and makes rollback cleaner if the integration fails. ``` ### Approve with a note ```markdown Approved. The scope is clear and the change is well-contained. For the next PR, add links to the previous and following PRs so the chain stays navigable. ``` ### Ask for split ```markdown This PR exceeds the 400-line budget, so we need to split it or justify `size:exception`. Suggested order: foundation + tests first, then integration, then docs. That gives each review a clear start and end. ``` ## Commands ```bash # Inspect a PR before writing review feedback gh pr view <PR_NUMBER> --json title,body,additions,deletions,changedFiles ```
GitHub에서 보기