Skip to main content

gentle-ai-comment-writer

Write warm, direct collaboration comments. Trigger: PR feedback, issue replies, reviews, Slack messages, or GitHub comments.

来源信息

仓库
Gentleman-Programming/gentle-shell
最近来源活动
2026年8月25日 15:16
检测到的 SKILL.md 语言
英语
星标
1,338
分支
204

安装方式

默认使用会先检查来源的 Prompt;你也可以切换为直接命令,或下载本地副本。

检查来源文件

决定是否安装前,请先阅读 SKILL.md,以及 SkillsMP 当前展示的配套文件。

正在显示 SKILL.md

SKILL.md
来源说明 · 只读预览
name
gentle-ai-comment-writer
description
Write warm, direct collaboration comments. Trigger: PR feedback, issue replies, reviews, Slack messages, or GitHub comments.
license
Apache-2.0
metadata
{"author":"gentleman-programming","version":"1.0"}
## When to Use Load this skill whenever you write a comment that another human will read. Use it for: - GitHub PR or issue comments. - Review feedback and requested changes. - Maintainer replies. - Slack, Discord, or async project updates. ## Voice Rules | Rule | Requirement | |------|-------------| | Be useful fast | Start with the actionable point. Do not recap the whole PR before feedback. | | Be warm and direct | Sound like a thoughtful teammate, not a corporate bot. | | Keep it short | Prefer 1 to 3 short paragraphs or a tight bullet list. | | Explain why | Give the technical reason when asking for a change. | | Avoid pile-ons | Comment on the highest-value issue, not every tiny preference. | | Match target context language | Write in the target context language by default: Spanish issue/thread -> Spanish comment, English issue/thread -> English comment, mixed context -> target message language. If the user explicitly requests a language or tone, follow that request. Do not use the active persona as the source of truth for public comments. For Spanish comments, use neutral/professional Spanish by default unless the user or target context clearly calls for regional tone. | | No em dashes | Use commas, periods, or parentheses instead. | ## Comment Formula ```text <Direct observation or request> <Why it matters, only if needed> <Concrete next action> ``` ## Examples ### Request change ```markdown Good approach overall. I'd split this into a separate commit because it mixes validation logic with UI wiring. That keeps the reviewer's focus narrower and makes rollback cleaner if the integration fails. ``` ### Approve with a note ```markdown Approved. The scope is clear and the change is well-contained. For the next PR, add links to the previous and following PRs so the chain stays navigable. ``` ### Ask for split ```markdown This PR exceeds the 400-line budget, so we need to split it or justify `size:exception`. Suggested order: foundation + tests first, then integration, then docs. That gives each review a clear start and end. ``` ## Commands ```bash # Inspect a PR before writing review feedback gh pr view <PR_NUMBER> --json title,body,additions,deletions,changedFiles ```
在 GitHub 查看