Skip to main content

create-rfc

Create OpenShell RFC proposals in rfc/ from a design request. Use when the user asks to write, draft, start, create, or update an RFC, Request for Comments, architecture proposal, API proposal, process proposal, or cross-cutting design proposal that should follow the OpenShell RFC process and template.

소스 정보

저장소
NVIDIA/OpenShell
최근 소스 활동
2026년 9월 29일 17:35
감지된 SKILL.md 언어
영어
스타
14,949
포크
1,703

설치 방법

기본적으로 소스를 먼저 확인하는 Prompt가 선택됩니다. 직접 명령으로 전환하거나 로컬 사본을 다운로드할 수도 있습니다.

소스 파일 검토

설치 여부를 결정하기 전에 SKILL.md와 SkillsMP에 표시된 보조 파일을 읽어 보세요.

파일 탐색기
2 개 파일

SKILL.md 표시 중

SKILL.md
소스 지침 · 읽기 전용 미리보기
name
create-rfc
description
Create OpenShell RFC proposals in rfc/ from a design request. Use when the user asks to write, draft, start, create, or update an RFC, Request for Comments, architecture proposal, API proposal, process proposal, or cross-cutting design proposal that should follow the OpenShell RFC process and template.
metadata
{"internal":true}
# Create RFC ## Workflow Create RFCs by following `rfc/README.md` and `rfc/0000-template/README.md`. Keep the template as the source of truth for section guidance. 1. Read `rfc/README.md` to confirm when an RFC is appropriate, how to choose the RFC number, and how the lifecycle works. 2. Read `rfc/0000-template/README.md` before drafting. Follow its section guidance, including scope, expected detail, and suggested section length. 3. Choose the next available `NNNN` from the existing `rfc/NNNN-*` directories unless the user provided a specific number. 4. Create `rfc/NNNN-short-title/README.md` by copying the template and replacing placeholders. Use a short hyphenated folder title. 5. Fill in front matter with the RFC author, `state: draft`, and any related links the user provided. If the author is unknown, use the requesting user's GitHub handle when available or leave the template placeholder. 6. Draft each section from the user's design context. Keep Summary concise, Motivation readable by anyone, Non-goals explicit, Proposal focused on what is being proposed, and Alternatives focused on credible competing approaches. 7. Preserve uncertainty in Open questions instead of silently deciding unknowns. If a missing decision blocks a coherent RFC, ask the user for that decision. 8. Check the completed RFC against the template once more before finishing. ## Writing Standards - Prefer concrete design statements over placeholder language. - Link to relevant issues, prior RFCs, and published docs when they provide needed context. - Keep rejected or left-out designs in Alternatives, not Proposal. - Use Mermaid diagrams for architecture or data flow when a diagram would make the proposal easier to review. - Do not update published docs just because an RFC was drafted. Those updates belong with implementation or with an accepted RFC when the user asks for them. ## Validation Before handing the RFC back to the user: - Verify the folder name and RFC number match the process in `rfc/README.md`. - Verify every template section is present or intentionally marked as not applicable. - Run a Markdown formatting or lint check only if the repo already provides one for Markdown-only changes.
GitHub에서 보기