Run any Skill in Manus with one click

create-rfc

Stars7,207

Forks872

UpdatedJune 15, 2026 at 19:03

Create OpenShell RFC proposals in rfc/ from a design request. Use when the user asks to write, draft, start, create, or update an RFC, Request for Comments, architecture proposal, API proposal, process proposal, or cross-cutting design proposal that should follow the OpenShell RFC process and template.

Installation

Install with Codex or Claude Copy this prompt, paste it into Codex, Claude, or another assistant, and let it review the skill page and install it for you.

Run Skill in Manus

Source

NVIDIA

NVIDIA/OpenShell

View GitHub Repository View Creator Repositories

Download

Run Skill in Manus

Related occupationsSOC

Based on SOC occupation classification

Management AnalystsBusiness and Financial Operations Occupations·SOC 13-1111

File Explorer

2 files

SKILL.md

readonly

name	create-rfc
description	Create OpenShell RFC proposals in rfc/ from a design request. Use when the user asks to write, draft, start, create, or update an RFC, Request for Comments, architecture proposal, API proposal, process proposal, or cross-cutting design proposal that should follow the OpenShell RFC process and template.

Create RFC

Workflow

Create RFCs by following rfc/README.md and rfc/0000-template/README.md. Keep the template as the source of truth for section guidance.

Read rfc/README.md to confirm when an RFC is appropriate, how to choose the RFC number, and how the lifecycle works.
Read rfc/0000-template/README.md before drafting. Follow its section guidance, including scope, expected detail, and suggested section length.
Choose the next available NNNN from the existing rfc/NNNN-* directories unless the user provided a specific number.
Create rfc/NNNN-short-title/README.md by copying the template and replacing placeholders. Use a short hyphenated folder title.
Fill in front matter with the RFC author, state: draft, and any related links the user provided. If the author is unknown, use the requesting user's GitHub handle when available or leave the template placeholder.
Draft each section from the user's design context. Keep Summary concise, Motivation readable by anyone, Non-goals explicit, Proposal focused on what is being proposed, and Alternatives focused on credible competing approaches.
Preserve uncertainty in Open questions instead of silently deciding unknowns. If a missing decision blocks a coherent RFC, ask the user for that decision.
Check the completed RFC against the template once more before finishing.

Writing Standards

Prefer concrete design statements over placeholder language.
Link to relevant issues, prior RFCs, and architecture docs when they provide needed context.
Keep rejected or left-out designs in Alternatives, not Proposal.
Use Mermaid diagrams for architecture or data flow when a diagram would make the proposal easier to review.
Do not update architecture/ or published docs just because an RFC was drafted. Those updates belong with implementation or with an accepted RFC when the user asks for them.

Validation

Before handing the RFC back to the user:

Verify the folder name and RFC number match the process in rfc/README.md.
Verify every template section is present or intentionally marked as not applicable.
Run a Markdown formatting or lint check only if the repo already provides one for Markdown-only changes.

More from this repository

same repository

debug-openshell-cluster

NVIDIA/OpenShell

Debug why an OpenShell gateway deployment is unhealthy, unreachable, or unable to create sandboxes. Use when the user has a gateway health failure, Docker/Podman runtime issue, Helm install failure, Kubernetes scheduling issue, TLS secret issue, VM driver issue, or sandbox startup problem. Trigger keywords - debug gateway, gateway failing, deployment failing, helm install failing, cluster health, gateway health, gateway not starting, health check failed, sandbox pending, docker driver, podman driver, vm driver.

2026-06-107.2k

openshell-cli

NVIDIA/OpenShell

Guide agents through using the OpenShell CLI (openshell) for sandbox management, gateway registration, provider configuration, policy iteration, BYOC workflows, and inference routing. Covers basic through advanced multi-step workflows. Trigger keywords - openshell, sandbox create, sandbox connect, logs, provider create, policy set, policy get, image push, forward, port forward, BYOC, bring your own container, use openshell, run openshell, CLI usage, manage sandbox, manage provider, gateway add, gateway select.

2026-06-107.2k

helm-dev-environment

NVIDIA/OpenShell

Start up, tear down, and configure the local Kubernetes development environment for OpenShell. Uses k3d (Docker-backed k3s) + Skaffold + Helm. Covers cluster lifecycle, optional add-ons (Keycloak OIDC, Envoy Gateway), HA testing, and port mappings. Trigger keywords - local k8s, local cluster, k3d, skaffold, helm dev, start cluster, stop cluster, tear down cluster, delete cluster, create cluster, helm:k3s, helm:skaffold, local dev environment, dev cluster, k8s dev, envoy gateway local, keycloak local, high availability, HA.

2026-06-107.2k

build-from-issue

NVIDIA/OpenShell

Given a GitHub issue number, plan and implement the work described in the issue. Operates iteratively - creates an implementation plan, responds to feedback, and only builds when the 'state:agent-ready' label is applied. Includes tests, documentation updates, and PR creation. Trigger keywords - build from issue, implement issue, work on issue, build issue, start issue.

2026-05-297.2k

create-github-pr

NVIDIA/OpenShell

Create GitHub pull requests using the gh CLI. Use when the user wants to create a new PR, submit code for review, or open a pull request. Trigger keywords - create PR, pull request, new PR, submit for review, code review.

2026-05-297.2k

create-spike

NVIDIA/OpenShell

Investigate a plain-language problem description by deeply exploring the codebase, then create a structured GitHub issue with technical findings. Prequel to build-from-issue — maps vague ideas to concrete, buildable issues. Trigger keywords - spike, investigate, explore, research issue, technical investigation, create spike, new spike, feasibility, codebase exploration.

2026-05-297.2k

name	create-rfc
description	Create OpenShell RFC proposals in rfc/ from a design request. Use when the user asks to write, draft, start, create, or update an RFC, Request for Comments, architecture proposal, API proposal, process proposal, or cross-cutting design proposal that should follow the OpenShell RFC process and template.

Create RFC

Workflow

Create RFCs by following rfc/README.md and rfc/0000-template/README.md. Keep the template as the source of truth for section guidance.

Read rfc/README.md to confirm when an RFC is appropriate, how to choose the RFC number, and how the lifecycle works.
Read rfc/0000-template/README.md before drafting. Follow its section guidance, including scope, expected detail, and suggested section length.
Choose the next available NNNN from the existing rfc/NNNN-* directories unless the user provided a specific number.
Create rfc/NNNN-short-title/README.md by copying the template and replacing placeholders. Use a short hyphenated folder title.
Fill in front matter with the RFC author, state: draft, and any related links the user provided. If the author is unknown, use the requesting user's GitHub handle when available or leave the template placeholder.
Draft each section from the user's design context. Keep Summary concise, Motivation readable by anyone, Non-goals explicit, Proposal focused on what is being proposed, and Alternatives focused on credible competing approaches.
Preserve uncertainty in Open questions instead of silently deciding unknowns. If a missing decision blocks a coherent RFC, ask the user for that decision.
Check the completed RFC against the template once more before finishing.

Writing Standards

Prefer concrete design statements over placeholder language.
Link to relevant issues, prior RFCs, and architecture docs when they provide needed context.
Keep rejected or left-out designs in Alternatives, not Proposal.
Use Mermaid diagrams for architecture or data flow when a diagram would make the proposal easier to review.
Do not update architecture/ or published docs just because an RFC was drafted. Those updates belong with implementation or with an accepted RFC when the user asks for them.

Validation

Before handing the RFC back to the user:

Verify the folder name and RFC number match the process in rfc/README.md.
Verify every template section is present or intentionally marked as not applicable.
Run a Markdown formatting or lint check only if the repo already provides one for Markdown-only changes.