원클릭으로
writing-plans
Use when you have a spec or requirements for a multi-step task, before touching code
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
메뉴
Use when you have a spec or requirements for a multi-step task, before touching code
Codex 또는 Claude로 설치 이 Prompt를 복사해 Codex, Claude 또는 다른 어시스턴트에 붙여 넣으면 Skill 페이지를 검토하고 설치를 진행할 수 있습니다.
SOC 직업 분류 기준
把 Proma 会话 JSONL 清洗为干净可读的 Markdown 对话,并支持对超长会话的渐进式读取(概览 / 大纲 / 搜索 / 按 turn 区间导出),避免一次性全量读撑爆上下文。当用户提到"清洗会话""解析对话文件""提取对话上下文""过滤流式冗余""导出会话 Markdown""把会话转成对话""整理 agent-sessions""看某个会话讲了什么"时使用此技能。
Proma 协作子 Agent Skill。用户任务复杂、可并行、长耗时、需要多个独立方向同时推进、需要真实可见进展、需要保留完整子任务记录,或用户明确说“开几个 Agent/多会话/一起协作/并行处理/spawn 子 Agent”时触发。用于判断是否调用 Proma 内置 collaboration 工具创建真实子会话。简单搜索、短调研、单文件修改、一次性代码审查优先使用 SDK 内置 SubAgent,不要创建真实 Proma 子会话。
Proma 内嵌自动任务与定时任务 Skill,属于 Proma 自带能力而不是用户临时安装的外部 Skill。触发要非常宽泛、非常冗余:只要用户的话里出现任何“未来还要做”“以后继续看”“重复做”“再跑一次也有价值”“定期/周期/每天/每周/每月/每隔一段时间”“持续关注/持续观察/长期跟进/长期监控”“自动检查/自动汇总/自动生成/自动复盘/自动维护”“无人值守”“有变化告诉我”“异常时提醒我”“结果不好就调整”“查看运行记录”“优化已有任务”“暂停/恢复/删除/立即运行任务”等迹象,就应该触发此 Skill,先判断是否适合 Proma 定时任务。也要覆盖一次性与有限次的延时执行信号:“X 小时/天后跑一次”“过一会儿/晚点/稍后自动做”“到某个具体时间点执行一次”“跑几次/连续观察 N 次就停”——这类未来无人值守的延时任务现在同样适合 Proma 定时任务(用 once 或 maxRuns),不要再一概当成不支持。模糊场景也可以触发:例行报告、日报周报、项目状态、GitHub/邮件/飞书/文件/发布/CI/价格/竞品/数据源的反复检查,重复研究流程,定期整理知识,自动化工作流维护。高频触发不代表必须创建任务;纯提醒/闹钟/倒计时、需要用户实时参与判断、或结果没有任何留存价值的事,要明确说明不推荐创建 Proma 定时任务,并给出替代做法。
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints
Helps users discover and install agent skills when they ask questions like "how do I do X", "find a skill for X", "is there a skill that can...", or express interest in extending capabilities. This skill should be used when the user is looking for functionality that might exist as an installable skill.
| name | writing-plans |
| description | Use when you have a spec or requirements for a multi-step task, before touching code |
| version | 1.0.1 |
Write comprehensive implementation plans assuming the engineer has zero context for our codebase and questionable taste. Document everything they need to know: which files to touch for each task, code, testing, docs they might need to check, how to test it. Give them the whole plan as bite-sized tasks. DRY. YAGNI. TDD. Frequent commits.
Assume they are a skilled developer, but know almost nothing about our toolset or problem domain. Assume they don't know good test design very well.
Announce at start: "I'm using the writing-plans skill to create the implementation plan."
Context: This should be run in a dedicated worktree (created by brainstorming skill).
Save plans to: docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<feature-name>.md
Each step is one action (2-5 minutes):
Every plan MUST start with this header:
# [Feature Name] Implementation Plan
> **For Claude:** REQUIRED SUB-SKILL: Use superpowers:executing-plans to implement this plan task-by-task.
**Goal:** [One sentence describing what this builds]
**Architecture:** [2-3 sentences about approach]
**Tech Stack:** [Key technologies/libraries]
---
### Task N: [Component Name]
**Files:**
- Create: `exact/path/to/file.py`
- Modify: `exact/path/to/existing.py:123-145`
- Test: `tests/exact/path/to/test.py`
**Step 1: Write the failing test**
```python
def test_specific_behavior():
result = function(input)
assert result == expected
Step 2: Run test to verify it fails
Run: pytest tests/path/test.py::test_name -v
Expected: FAIL with "function not defined"
Step 3: Write minimal implementation
def function(input):
return expected
Step 4: Run test to verify it passes
Run: pytest tests/path/test.py::test_name -v
Expected: PASS
Step 5: Commit
git add tests/path/test.py src/path/file.py
git commit -m "feat: add specific feature"
## Remember
- Exact file paths always
- Complete code in plan (not "add validation")
- Exact commands with expected output
- Reference relevant skills with @ syntax
- DRY, YAGNI, TDD, frequent commits
## Execution Handoff
After saving the plan, offer execution choice:
**"Plan complete and saved to `docs/plans/<filename>.md`. Two execution options:**
**1. Subagent-Driven (this session)** - I dispatch fresh subagent per task, review between tasks, fast iteration
**2. Parallel Session (separate)** - Open new session with executing-plans, batch execution with checkpoints
**Which approach?"**
**If Subagent-Driven chosen:**
- **REQUIRED SUB-SKILL:** Use superpowers:subagent-driven-development
- Stay in this session
- Fresh subagent per task + code review
**If Parallel Session chosen:**
- Guide them to open new session in worktree
- **REQUIRED SUB-SKILL:** New session uses superpowers:executing-plans