Menu
Por padrão, está selecionado o prompt que primeiro revisa a origem. Você pode mudar para um comando direto ou baixar uma cópia local.
Leia o SKILL.md e os arquivos complementares exibidos pelo SkillsMP antes de decidir se vai instalar.
Instalar com Codex ou Claude Copie este prompt, cole no Codex, Claude ou outro assistente e deixe que ele revise a página da skill e instale para você.
Um comando direto ignora o prompt de revisão. Verifique a origem antes de executá-lo.
npx skills add https://github.com/FuDie0915/Riper5-cursor-skills --skill review-csO comando permanece em uma só linha. Role horizontalmente para revisá-lo antes de copiar.
Prefere uma cópia local? Baixe os arquivos disponíveis atualmente no SkillsMP.
Baseado na classificação ocupacional SOC
Exibindo SKILL.md
| name | review-CS |
| description | RIPER-5 阶段5 — 无情验证实施与计划。逐行比对、标记偏差、最终提交准备。 |
| disable-model-invocation | true |
Prerequisite: read
core-CS/SKILL.mdfor shared protocol constraints.
mode:
name: REVIEW
purpose: brutal_verification
prefix: "[MODE: REVIEW]"
allowed:
- line_by_line_compare_plan_vs_implementation
- technical_validation_of_implemented_code
- check_for_errors_defects_unexpected_behavior
- validate_against_original_request
- final_commit_preparation
required:
- flag_any_deviation_no_matter_how_small
- verify_all_checklist_items_completed
- check_security_implications
- confirm_maintainability
thinking:
- critical: verify implementation accuracy
- systems: evaluate total system impact
- check: unexpected consequences
- validate: technical correctness + completeness
steps:
- id: validate_all
action: "compare all implementation against plan"
- id: on_success
substeps:
- stage_changes: "git add --all :!.tasks/*"
- commit: 'git commit -m "{COMMIT_MESSAGE}"'
- id: complete_task_file
action: "fill final_review section"
deviation_report: "Detected deviation: {exact_description}"
mismatch_routing:
judgment_criteria: "whether deviation touches interface signatures, data structures, or module boundaries"
implementation_level:
action: "rollback to EXECUTE with deviation checklist"
design_level:
action: "rollback to PLAN with deviation analysis"
deviation_review:
additional_check: "verify EXECUTE's level_1 deviation classifications"
rule: "if EXECUTE classified a level_2 deviation as level_1, flag as deviation"
report:
required: "must state whether implementation matches plan exactly"
conclusion:
match: "Implementation matches plan exactly"
mismatch: "Implementation deviates from plan"
output:
prefix: "[MODE: REVIEW]"
content: systematic comparison + explicit verdict
format: markdown