Skip to main content

blend-plan-implementation

Create a portable Japanese–Vietnamese BLEND implementation plan from explicitly approved artifact revisions and selected scope, current blend-context, artifact-review disposition and the affected codebase. Planning only; do not create Design or execute implementation.

Informações da origem

Repositório
TryHand-Co-Ltd/blend-kit
Última atividade na origem
4 de outubro de 2026 às 16:18
Idioma detectado do SKILL.md
inglês
Estrelas
0
Forks
0

Opções de instalação

Por padrão, está selecionado o prompt que primeiro revisa a origem. Você pode mudar para um comando direto ou baixar uma cópia local.

Revise os arquivos de origem

Leia o SKILL.md e os arquivos complementares exibidos pelo SkillsMP antes de decidir se vai instalar.

Explorador de arquivos
4 arquivos

Exibindo SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instruções da origem · Visualização somente leitura
name
blend-plan-implementation
description
Create a portable Japanese–Vietnamese BLEND implementation plan from explicitly approved artifact revisions and selected scope, current blend-context, artifact-review disposition and the affected codebase. Planning only; do not create Design or execute implementation.
# Blend Plan Implementation Turn approved outcomes into an actionable plan for the team. Read [shared workflow](../../shared/workflow.md), [template registry](../../shared/artifact-formats.md) and [planning reference](references/planning.md). Resolve package resources from this skill and checkouts through bounded discovery; the installed package is not the application root. 1. Read applicable workspace/documentation/application instructions and development rules. Verify the exact feature, Task ID when selected, immediate parent, current CONTEXT and authorized confirmations; reuse existing folders/slugs. Scope comes from the user's approved selection, never Split Task numbering or title similarity. 2. Verify **PlanningBasis** against actual artifact bytes/revisions, artifact review and explicit approval of those revisions and scope. Keep source authority, review PASS and approval separate. Missing/stale approval or business blockers affect only dependent scope; an explicitly approved independent selected slice can proceed. Do not generate missing Task/Design/Test Spec prerequisites or amend approved behavior. 3. Read the affected code flow/callers and selected relevant topics/dependencies. Pin Git and working-content identities; verify available toolchain commands without running application checks. Decompose supported outcomes into steps with files/symbol roles, prerequisites, ownership/contracts, binding obligations and AC-to-step-to-planned-proof mapping. 4. Resolve every requested language/output in the registry and load its exact `implementation-plan@1.0.0` asset. Default to JA/VI at `features/<verified-feature>/plans/<scope>-implementation-plan.{ja,vi}.md`, including task-scoped metadata. Retain six required H2 sections, explicit none where applicable and only predicate-supported conditional H3s. Missing mapping/template blocks that output. 5. Reconcile source, approval, constraints, IDs, interfaces and meaning between versions. Leave the plan **Draft** for review; identify affected Blocked scope and unrun proof. Return shared **BranchResult** with actual paths, basis used, completed/incomplete scope, gaps/deltas and status. Before handoff, run the shared [registered Markdown gate](../../shared/artifact-formats.md#deterministic-handoff-gate) on each final saved requested output using its exact type/language/logical filename. Follow the asset's exact labels and inline or block/list presentation; an inline slot needs a concise nonempty summary on the same line, with details below when useful. Authoring instructions/placeholders/fences cannot fill it. Preserve genuine template-authorized no-findings/none and conditional cases. Failed/unavailable gate leaves affected outputs Draft/Blocked and the branch incomplete; report the mismatch/capability, never Complete. Chat-only reviews apply the same fields without creating an unrequested file and disclose that the file gate was not run. Workbook parity/render/recalculation and semantic/source/approval checks remain separate. Capture final selected topics, decisive dependencies and approval/review inputs with the shared read-only `capture` command against each verified root. Compare actual stdout SHA256 receipts to approved/frozen identities; never report an expected supplied hash as an observed capture. Preserve inputs while consumed; unavailable capture is an explicit identity gap, not a matching-byte claim. Keep portable paths in shared outputs and actual roots only in transient intake. Write only authorized plan files. Preserve dirty/historical files and frozen inputs. Shared paths/commands are portable; no workstation configuration, private plans or secrets. No Design, code, automated tests, SQL/migrations, executor calls, execution-method questionnaire, installation, publication or release follows. Approval of the inputs or this plan never substitutes for separate execution authorization.
Ver no GitHub