Skip to main content

blend-plan-implementation

Create a portable Japanese–Vietnamese BLEND implementation plan from explicitly approved artifact revisions and selected scope, current blend-context, artifact-review disposition and the affected codebase. Planning only; do not create Design or execute implementation.

Quellinformationen

Repository
TryHand-Co-Ltd/blend-kit
Letzte Quellaktivität
4. Oktober 2026 um 16:18
Erkannte Sprache von SKILL.md
Englisch
Sterne
0
Forks
0

Installationsoptionen

Standardmäßig ist der Prompt ausgewählt, der zuerst die Quelle prüft. Sie können zu einem direkten Befehl wechseln oder eine lokale Kopie herunterladen.

Quelldateien prüfen

Lesen Sie SKILL.md und alle von SkillsMP angezeigten Begleitdateien, bevor Sie sich für eine Installation entscheiden.

Datei-Explorer
4 Dateien

SKILL.md wird angezeigt

SKILL.md
Quellanweisungen · Schreibgeschützte Vorschau
name
blend-plan-implementation
description
Create a portable Japanese–Vietnamese BLEND implementation plan from explicitly approved artifact revisions and selected scope, current blend-context, artifact-review disposition and the affected codebase. Planning only; do not create Design or execute implementation.
# Blend Plan Implementation Turn approved outcomes into an actionable plan for the team. Read [shared workflow](../../shared/workflow.md), [template registry](../../shared/artifact-formats.md) and [planning reference](references/planning.md). Resolve package resources from this skill and checkouts through bounded discovery; the installed package is not the application root. 1. Read applicable workspace/documentation/application instructions and development rules. Verify the exact feature, Task ID when selected, immediate parent, current CONTEXT and authorized confirmations; reuse existing folders/slugs. Scope comes from the user's approved selection, never Split Task numbering or title similarity. 2. Verify **PlanningBasis** against actual artifact bytes/revisions, artifact review and explicit approval of those revisions and scope. Keep source authority, review PASS and approval separate. Missing/stale approval or business blockers affect only dependent scope; an explicitly approved independent selected slice can proceed. Do not generate missing Task/Design/Test Spec prerequisites or amend approved behavior. 3. Read the affected code flow/callers and selected relevant topics/dependencies. Pin Git and working-content identities; verify available toolchain commands without running application checks. Decompose supported outcomes into steps with files/symbol roles, prerequisites, ownership/contracts, binding obligations and AC-to-step-to-planned-proof mapping. 4. Resolve every requested language/output in the registry and load its exact `implementation-plan@1.0.0` asset. Default to JA/VI at `features/<verified-feature>/plans/<scope>-implementation-plan.{ja,vi}.md`, including task-scoped metadata. Retain six required H2 sections, explicit none where applicable and only predicate-supported conditional H3s. Missing mapping/template blocks that output. 5. Reconcile source, approval, constraints, IDs, interfaces and meaning between versions. Leave the plan **Draft** for review; identify affected Blocked scope and unrun proof. Return shared **BranchResult** with actual paths, basis used, completed/incomplete scope, gaps/deltas and status. Before handoff, run the shared [registered Markdown gate](../../shared/artifact-formats.md#deterministic-handoff-gate) on each final saved requested output using its exact type/language/logical filename. Follow the asset's exact labels and inline or block/list presentation; an inline slot needs a concise nonempty summary on the same line, with details below when useful. Authoring instructions/placeholders/fences cannot fill it. Preserve genuine template-authorized no-findings/none and conditional cases. Failed/unavailable gate leaves affected outputs Draft/Blocked and the branch incomplete; report the mismatch/capability, never Complete. Chat-only reviews apply the same fields without creating an unrequested file and disclose that the file gate was not run. Workbook parity/render/recalculation and semantic/source/approval checks remain separate. Capture final selected topics, decisive dependencies and approval/review inputs with the shared read-only `capture` command against each verified root. Compare actual stdout SHA256 receipts to approved/frozen identities; never report an expected supplied hash as an observed capture. Preserve inputs while consumed; unavailable capture is an explicit identity gap, not a matching-byte claim. Keep portable paths in shared outputs and actual roots only in transient intake. Write only authorized plan files. Preserve dirty/historical files and frozen inputs. Shared paths/commands are portable; no workstation configuration, private plans or secrets. No Design, code, automated tests, SQL/migrations, executor calls, execution-method questionnaire, installation, publication or release follows. Approval of the inputs or this plan never substitutes for separate execution authorization.
Auf GitHub ansehen