// "AI-powered testability assessment using 10 principles of intrinsic testability with Playwright. Evaluates web applications against Observability, Controllability, Algorithmic Simplicity, Transparency, Stability, Explainability, Unbugginess, Smallness, Decomposability, and Similarity. Use when assessing software testability, evaluating test readiness, identifying testability improvements, or generating testability reports."
| name | testability-scoring |
| description | AI-powered testability assessment using 10 principles of intrinsic testability with Playwright. Evaluates web applications against Observability, Controllability, Algorithmic Simplicity, Transparency, Stability, Explainability, Unbugginess, Smallness, Decomposability, and Similarity. Use when assessing software testability, evaluating test readiness, identifying testability improvements, or generating testability reports. |
| category | testing-methodologies |
| priority | high |
| tokenEstimate | 1100 |
| agents | ["qe-quality-analyzer","qx-partner","qe-visual-tester"] |
| implementation_status | optimized |
| optimization_version | 2.1 |
| last_optimized | "2025-12-03T00:00:00.000Z" |
| dependencies | [] |
| quick_reference_card | true |
| tags | ["testability","scoring","playwright","assessment","10-principles","intrinsic-testability","james-bach","michael-bolton"] |
| contributor | @fndlalit |
<default_to_action> When assessing testability:
Quick Assessment:
# Run assessment on any URL
TEST_URL='https://example.com/' npx playwright test tests/testability-scoring/testability-scoring.spec.js --project=chromium --workers=1
# Or use shell script wrapper
.claude/skills/testability-scoring/scripts/run-assessment.sh https://example.com/
The 10 Principles at a Glance:
| Principle | Weight | Key Question |
|---|---|---|
| Observability | 15% | Can we see what's happening? |
| Controllability | 15% | Can we control the application? |
| Algorithmic Simplicity | 10% | Are behaviors predictable? |
| Algorithmic Transparency | 10% | Can we understand what it does? |
| Algorithmic Stability | 10% | Does behavior remain consistent? |
| Explainability | 10% | Is the interface understandable? |
| Unbugginess | 10% | How error-free is it? |
| Smallness | 10% | Are components appropriately sized? |
| Decomposability | 5% | Can we test parts in isolation? |
| Similarity | 5% | Is the tech stack familiar? |
Grade Scale:
| Method | Command | When to Use |
|---|---|---|
| Shell Script | ./scripts/run-assessment.sh URL | One-time assessment |
| ENV Override | TEST_URL='URL' npx playwright test... | CI/CD integration |
| Config File | Update tests/testability-scoring/config.js | Repeated runs |
| Principle | Measures | Indicators |
|---|---|---|
| Observability | State visibility, logging, monitoring | Console output, network tracking, error visibility |
| Controllability | Input control, state manipulation | API access, test data injection, determinism |
| Principle | Measures | Indicators |
|---|---|---|
| Simplicity | Predictable behavior | Clear I/O relationships, low complexity |
| Transparency | Understanding what system does | Visible processes, readable code |
| Stability | Consistent behavior | Change resilience, maintainability |
| Explainability | Interface understanding | Good docs, semantic structure, help text |
| Unbugginess | Error-free operation | Console errors, warnings, runtime issues |
| Smallness | Component size | Element count, script bloat, page complexity |
| Principle | Measures | Indicators |
|---|---|---|
| Decomposability | Isolation testing | Component separation, modular design |
| Similarity | Technology familiarity | Standard frameworks, known patterns |
1. Navigate to URL โ 2. Collect Metrics โ 3. Score Principles
โ
4. Generate JSON โ 5. Calculate Grades โ 6. Apply Weights
โ
7. Generate HTML Report with Radar Chart
โ
8. Open in Browser (auto-opens)
tests/reports/
โโโ testability-results-<timestamp>.json # Raw data
โโโ testability-report-<timestamp>.html # Visual report
โโโ latest.json # Symlink
# GitHub Actions
- name: Testability Assessment
run: |
timeout 180 .claude/skills/testability-scoring/scripts/run-assessment.sh ${{ env.APP_URL }}
- name: Upload Reports
uses: actions/upload-artifact@v3
with:
name: testability-reports
path: tests/reports/testability-*.html
// Combine testability with QX analysis
const qxAnalysis = await Task("QX Analysis", {
target: 'https://example.com',
integrateTestability: true
}, "qx-partner");
// Returns combined insights:
// - QX Score: 78/100
// - Testability Integration: Observability 72/100
// - Combined Insight: Low observability may mask UX issues
import { runTestabilityAssessment } from './testability';
const results = await runTestabilityAssessment('https://example.com');
console.log(`Overall: ${results.overallScore}/100 (${results.grade})`);
console.log('Recommendations:', results.recommendations);
// Run testability assessment
const assessment = await Task("Testability Assessment", {
url: 'https://example.com',
generateReport: true,
openBrowser: true
}, "qe-quality-analyzer");
// Use with QX Partner for holistic analysis
const qxReport = await Task("Full QX Analysis", {
target: 'https://example.com',
integrateTestability: true,
detectOracleProblems: true
}, "qx-partner");
aqe/testability/
โโโ assessments/* - Assessment results by URL
โโโ historical/* - Historical scores for trend analysis
โโโ recommendations/* - Improvement recommendations
โโโ integration/* - QX integration data
const testabilityFleet = await FleetManager.coordinate({
strategy: 'testability-assessment',
agents: [
'qe-quality-analyzer', // Primary assessment
'qx-partner', // UX integration
'qe-visual-tester' // Visual validation
],
topology: 'sequential'
});
| Issue | Solution |
|---|---|
| Tests timing out | Increase timeout: timeout 300 ./scripts/run-assessment.sh URL |
| Partial results | Check console errors, increase network timeout |
| Report not opening | Use AUTO_OPEN=false, open manually |
| Config not updating | Use TEST_URL env var instead |
Testability is an investment, not an afterthought.
Good testability:
Low scores = High risk. Prioritize improvements by weight ร impact.