菜单
Use when writing academic prose for qualitative research — findings, methods, discussion sections with appropriate voice and conventions.
用 Codex 或 Claude 帮你安装 复制这段 Prompt，粘贴到 Codex、Claude 或其他助手里，让它检查 Skill 页面并帮你完成安装。
基于 SOC 职业分类
Use when conducting participatory action research (PAR) involving collaborative inquiry, cycles of action and reflection.
Use when formatting academic work in APA 7th edition style — citations, references, headings, tables, and manuscript structure.
Use when designing or conducting case study research following Yin's multiple case study methodology or Stake's approach.
Use when developing and densifying categories with properties, dimensions, conditions, and consequences.
Use when formatting academic work in Chicago/Turabian style — notes-bibliography or author-date systems.
Use when orchestrating the full open → selective → theoretical coding pipeline in grounded theory analysis.
| name | academic-writing |
| description | Use when writing academic prose for qualitative research — findings, methods, discussion sections with appropriate voice and conventions. |
Qualitative writing must show analytic work while remaining readable. The goal is disciplined interpretation: claims tethered to evidence, voice appropriate to genre, and structure that guides readers through complex meaning.
First person (“we/I”) is increasingly acceptable in qualitative methods writing because agency and positionality matter. Use active voice for clarity (“We analyzed transcripts”) while avoiding self-centered prose that eclipses participants’ words.
Qualitative claims are often probabilistic and situated. Appropriate hedges: “suggests,” “indicates,” “in this sample,” “participants described.” Avoid hedging so heavily that claims disappear; avoid over-certainty without evidence.
One main idea per paragraph; opening sentence states the claim; following sentences support with reasoning, excerpt references, or cross-case comparison; final sentence transitions or deepens significance.
Use headings, forecasting sentences, and explicit roadmap paragraphs in long documents (dissertations). In articles, respect word limits—signpost minimally but clearly.
Introduce excerpts; avoid “quote dumping.” Trim quotes with ellipses only ethically and transparently. Follow APA block quote rules when applicable.
Pair excerpts with analytic commentary: what the excerpt illustrates, how it varies across cases, and how it links to a category. Name the participant pseudonym and data type (interview, field note).
Dissertations can show process (audit trail, extensive methods). Journal articles foreground contribution and compress procedural detail into supplements. Practitioner briefs emphasize actionable insights with ethical caveats.
Move from categories to theoretical statements about relationships among categories (conditions, strategies, consequences). Use memos as drafting scaffolding.
